Literature DB >> 27152687

Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Robert R Edwards1, Robert H Dworkin2, Dennis C Turk3, Martin S Angst4, Raymond Dionne5, Roy Freeman1, Per Hansson6, Simon Haroutounian7, Lars Arendt-Nielsen8, Nadine Attal9, Ralf Baron10, Joanna Brell11, Shay Bujanover12, Laurie B Burke13,14, Daniel Carr15, Amy S Chappell16, Penney Cowan17, Mila Etropolski18, Roger B Fillingim19, Jennifer S Gewandter2, Nathaniel P Katz15,20, Ernest A Kopecky21, John D Markman2, George Nomikos22, Linda Porter23, Bob A Rappaport24, Andrew S C Rice25, Joseph M Scavone26, Joachim Scholz27, Lee S Simon28, Shannon M Smith2, Jeffrey Tobias29, Tina Tockarshewsky30, Christine Veasley31, Mark Versavel32, Ajay D Wasan33, Warren Wen34, David Yarnitsky35.   

Abstract

There is tremendous interpatient variability in the response to analgesic therapy (even for efficacious treatments), which can be the source of great frustration in clinical practice. This has led to calls for "precision medicine" or personalized pain therapeutics (ie, empirically based algorithms that determine the optimal treatments, or treatment combinations, for individual patients) that would presumably improve both the clinical care of patients with pain and the success rates for putative analgesic drugs in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. However, before implementing this approach, the characteristics of individual patients or subgroups of patients that increase or decrease the response to a specific treatment need to be identified. The challenge is to identify the measurable phenotypic characteristics of patients that are most predictive of individual variation in analgesic treatment outcomes, and the measurement tools that are best suited to evaluate these characteristics. In this article, we present evidence on the most promising of these phenotypic characteristics for use in future research, including psychosocial factors, symptom characteristics, sleep patterns, responses to noxious stimulation, endogenous pain-modulatory processes, and response to pharmacologic challenge. We provide evidence-based recommendations for core phenotyping domains and recommend measures of each domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27152687      PMCID: PMC5965275          DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   7.926


  269 in total

Review 1.  Pain, catastrophizing, and depression in the rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Christine Cahalan; Christine Calahan; George Mensing; Michael Smith; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera.

Authors:  Lars Arendt-Nielsen; David Yarnitsky
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 3.  Quantitative methods for somatosensory evaluation in atypical odontalgia.

Authors:  André Luís Porporatti; Yuri Martins Costa; Juliana Stuginski-Barbosa; Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim; Paulo César Rodrigues Conti; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2015-01-23

4.  Pain quality predicts lidocaine analgesia among patients with suspected neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Ian R Carroll; Jared W Younger; Sean C Mackey
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  The effect of oxcarbazepine in peripheral neuropathic pain depends on pain phenotype: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phenotype-stratified study.

Authors:  Dyveke T Demant; Karen Lund; Jan Vollert; Christoph Maier; Märtha Segerdahl; Nanna B Finnerup; Troels S Jensen; Søren H Sindrup
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Spinal cord stimulation attenuates temporal summation in patients with neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Elon Eisenberg; Yulia Burstein; Erica Suzan; Roi Treister; Joshua Aviram
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Robert N Jamison; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-01

8.  Disability and pain after cortisone versus placebo injection for trapeziometacarpal arthrosis and de Quervain syndrome.

Authors:  Dennis J S Makarawung; Stéphanie J E Becker; Stijn Bekkers; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-12

9.  Effectiveness and Safety of Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Versus a Combination of Tapentadol PR and Pregabalin for the Management of Severe, Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Component: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3b Study.

Authors:  Ralf Baron; Emilio Martin-Mola; Matthias Müller; Cecile Dubois; Dietmar Falke; Ilona Steigerwald
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis Revicki; Gale Harding; Laurie B Burke; David Cella; Charles S Cleeland; Penney Cowan; John T Farrar; Sharon Hertz; Mitchell B Max; Bob A Rappaport
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  102 in total

1.  Electroacupuncture for Treating Chronic Low-Back Pain: Preliminary Research Results.

Authors:  Jiang-Ti Kong
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  Daytime and Nighttime Sleep Characteristics and Pain Among Adults With Stable Heart Failure.

Authors:  Samantha Conley; Shelli L Feder; Sangchoon Jeon; Nancy S Redeker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Progress in pain medicine: where are we now?

Authors:  Lesley A Colvin; Andrew S C Rice
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Breaking barriers to novel analgesic drug development.

Authors:  Ajay S Yekkirala; David P Roberson; Bruce P Bean; Clifford J Woolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Opioids and Chronic Pain: Where Is the Balance?

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Zankhana Mehta
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic potential of microglial inhibitors in neuropathic pain and morphine tolerance.

Authors:  Er-Rong Du; Rong-Ping Fan; Li-Lou Rong; Zhen Xie; Chang-Shui Xu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020 Mar.       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Age differences in cognitive-affective processes in adults with chronic pain.

Authors:  Caitlin B Murray; Kushang V Patel; Hanah Twiddy; John A Sturgeon; Tonya M Palermo
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 8.  Combining Human and Rodent Genetics to Identify New Analgesics.

Authors:  Alban Latremoliere; Michael Costigan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.203

9.  The addition of blood flow restriction to resistance exercise in individuals with knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Iván Cuyul-Vásquez; Alejandro Leiva-Sepúlveda; Oscar Catalán-Medalla; Felipe Araya-Quintanilla; Hector Gutiérrez-Espinoza
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Is osteoarthritis one disease or a collection of many?

Authors:  Leticia A Deveza; Richard F Loeser
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.