Literature DB >> 23247806

Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation.

Claudia M Campbell1, Robert N Jamison, Robert R Edwards.   

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is becoming a widely used treatment for a number of pain conditions and is frequently considered as a pain management option when conservative or less invasive techniques have proven to be ineffective. Potential indications for SCS include complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic nerve injury, failed back surgery syndrome, refractory angina pectoris, peripheral vascular disease, neuropathic pain, and visceral pain (Guttman et al. Pain Pract. 9:308-11, 2009). While research on SCS is in its infancy, it is clear that substantial variation exists in the degree of benefit obtained from SCS, and the procedure does not come without risks; thus focused patient selection is becoming very important. Psychological characteristics play an important role in shaping individual differences in the pain experience and may influence responses to SCS, as well as a variety of other pain treatments (Doleys Neurosurg Focus 21:E1, 2006). In addition to psychological assessment, quantitative sensory testing (QST) procedures offer another valuable resource in forecasting who may benefit most from SCS and may also shed light on mechanisms underlying the individual characteristics promoting the effectiveness of such procedures (Eisenberg et al. Pain Pract. 6:161-165, 2006). Here, we present a brief overview of recent studies examining these factors in their relationship with SCS outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23247806      PMCID: PMC3601592          DOI: 10.1007/s11916-012-0307-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep        ISSN: 1534-3081


  52 in total

1.  Effects of age on temporal summation and habituation of thermal pain: clinical relevance in healthy older and younger adults.

Authors:  R R Edwards; R B Fillingim
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 2.  Can we predict persistent postoperative pain by testing preoperative experimental pain?

Authors:  Michal Granot
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.706

3.  Impact of spinal cord stimulation on sensory characteristics in complex regional pain syndrome type I: a randomized trial.

Authors:  M A Kemler; J P Reulen; G A Barendse; M van Kleef; H C de Vet; F A van den Wildenberg
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Central nervous system mechanisms of pain in fibromyalgia and other musculoskeletal disorders: behavioral and psychologic treatment approaches.

Authors:  Laurence A Bradley; Nancy L McKendree-Smith
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms of action.

Authors:  John C Oakley; Joshua P Prager
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Evidence of involvement of central neural mechanisms in generating fibromyalgia pain.

Authors:  Roland Staud
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 7.  Wind-up and neuroplasticity: is there a correlation to clinical pain?

Authors:  L Arendt-Nielsen; S Petersen-Felix
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl       Date:  1995-05

Review 8.  Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity: prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis.

Authors:  Eldon R Tunks; Joan Crook; Robin Weir
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 9.  Spinal mechanisms of acute and persistent pain.

Authors:  A I Basbaum
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

10.  Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for long-lasting pain relief after spinal cord stimulation: practical use for patient selection.

Authors:  Marc P Sindou; Patrick Mertens; Uzi Bendavid; Luis García-Larrea; François Mauguière
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Patient selection for spinal cord stimulators: mental health perspective.

Authors:  Kari A Stephens; Alison Ward
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-03

2.  Dynamic Pain Phenotypes are Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulation-Induced Reduction in Pain: A Repeated Measures Observational Pilot Study.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Luis F Buenaver; Srinivasa N Raja; Kasey B Kiley; Lauren J Swedberg; Paul W Wacnik; Steven P Cohen; Michael A Erdek; Kayode A Williams; Paul J Christo
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 3.  Neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Taylor Ludman; Didier Bouhassira; Ralf Baron; Anthony H Dickenson; David Yarnitsky; Roy Freeman; Andrea Truini; Nadine Attal; Nanna B Finnerup; Christopher Eccleston; Eija Kalso; David L Bennett; Robert H Dworkin; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 4.  Neuropathic Pain and Spinal Cord Injury: Phenotypes and Pharmacological Management.

Authors:  Eva Widerström-Noga
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Development of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Treatment Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Amir Hadanny; Tessa Harland; Olga Khazen; Marisa DiMarzio; Anthony Marchese; Ilknur Telkes; Vishad Sukul; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Measuring Emotional Intelligence Enhances the Psychological Evaluation of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Eva M Doherty; Rosemary Walsh; Leanne Andrews; Susan McPherson
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Martin S Angst; Raymond Dionne; Roy Freeman; Per Hansson; Simon Haroutounian; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Nadine Attal; Ralf Baron; Joanna Brell; Shay Bujanover; Laurie B Burke; Daniel Carr; Amy S Chappell; Penney Cowan; Mila Etropolski; Roger B Fillingim; Jennifer S Gewandter; Nathaniel P Katz; Ernest A Kopecky; John D Markman; George Nomikos; Linda Porter; Bob A Rappaport; Andrew S C Rice; Joseph M Scavone; Joachim Scholz; Lee S Simon; Shannon M Smith; Jeffrey Tobias; Tina Tockarshewsky; Christine Veasley; Mark Versavel; Ajay D Wasan; Warren Wen; David Yarnitsky
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.926

8.  Factors associated with the success of trial spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain from failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Byung-Chul Son; Deok-Ryeong Kim; Sang-Won Lee; Chung-Kee Chough
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-12-31

9.  Complex regional pain syndrome-up-to-date.

Authors:  Frank Birklein; Violeta Dimova
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-10-05

10.  Improving outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy: current practice, future directions, and research gaps. Proceedings of the 2019 International Sleep Surgery Society Research Forum.

Authors:  Maria V Suurna; Ofer Jacobowitz; Jolie Chang; Ioannis Koutsourelakis; David Smith; Uri Alkan; Mark D'Agostino; Maurits Boon; Clemens Heiser; Paul Hoff; Colin Huntley; David Kent; Alan Kominsky; Richard Lewis; Joachim T Maurer; Madeline J Ravesloot; Ryan Soose; Armin Steffen; Edward M Weaver; Amy M Williams; Tucker Woodson; Kathleen Yaremchuk; Stacey L Ishman
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.