Literature DB >> 19380256

Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera.

Lars Arendt-Nielsen1, David Yarnitsky.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Quantification of the human painful sensory experience is an essential step in the translation of knowledge from animal nociception to human pain. Translational models for assessment of pain are very important, as such models can be used in: 1) basic mechanistic studies in healthy volunteers; 2) clinical studies for diagnostic and monitoring purposes; 3) pharmacological studies to evaluate analgesic efficacy of new and existing compounds. Quantitative pain assessment, or quantitative sensory testing (QST), provides psychophysical methods that systematically document alterations and reorganization in nervous system function and, in particular, the nociceptive system. QST is defined as the determination of thresholds or stimulus response curves for sensory processing under normal and pathophysiological conditions. The modern concept of advanced QST for experimental pain assessment is a multimodality, multitissue approach where different pain modalities (thermal, mechanical, electrical, and chemical) are applied to different tissues (skin, muscles, and viscera) and the responses are assessed by psychophysical methods (thresholds and stimulus-response functions). Many new and advanced technologies have been developed to help relieve evoked, standardized, and painful reactions. Assessing pain has become a question of solving a multi-input, multi-output problem, with the solution providing the possibility of teasing out which pain pathways and mechanisms are involved, impaired, or affected. PERSPECTIVE: Many methodologies have been developed for quantitative assessment of pain perception and involved mechanisms. This paper describes the background for the different methods, the use in basic pain experiments on healthy volunteers, how they can be applied in drug profiling, and the applications in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19380256     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  155 in total

Review 1.  Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Charles W Gay; Joel E Bialosky; Giselle D Carnaby; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Test-retest reliability of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and electrical pain thresholds after single and repeated stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  José A Biurrun Manresa; Alban Y Neziri; Michele Curatolo; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Ole K Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Neurological diseases and pain.

Authors:  David Borsook
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 4.  Quantitative sensory testing of neuropathic pain patients: potential mechanistic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Doreen B Pfau; Christian Geber; Frank Birklein; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

5.  Characteristics of the local cutaneous sensory thermoneutral zone.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Hui Zhang; Edward A Arens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Conditioned pain modulation: a predictor for development and treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Yelena Granovsky
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  Can quantitative sensory testing move us closer to mechanism-based pain management?

Authors:  Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  Development and validation of a pressure-type automated quantitative sensory testing system for point-of-care pain assessment.

Authors:  Steven E Harte; Mainak Mitra; Eric A Ichesco; Megan E Halvorson; Daniel J Clauw; Albert J Shih; Grant H Kruger
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 9.  Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Robert N Jamison; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-01

10.  Experimental pain responses support peripheral and central sensitization in patients with unilateral shoulder pain.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Corey B Simon; Carolina Valencia; Steven Z George
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.