Literature DB >> 27151903

Prediction of Spontaneous Preterm Birth Among Nulliparous Women With a Short Cervix.

William A Grobman1, Yinglei Lai2, Jay D Iams3, Uma M Reddy4, Brian M Mercer5, George Saade6, Alan T Tita7, Dwight J Rouse8, Yoram Sorokin9, Ronald J Wapner10, Kenneth J Leveno11, Sean C Blackwell12, M Sean Esplin13, Jorge E Tolosa14, John M Thorp15, Steve N Caritis16.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether demographic and sonographic factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth among nulliparous women with a cervical length of less than 30 mm could be combined into an accurate prediction model for spontaneous preterm birth.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a trial of nulliparous women with a singleton gestation and a cervical length of less than 30 mm on transvaginal sonography between 16 and 22 weeks who lacked other risk factors for spontaneous (eg, prior cervical excisional procedure) or medically indicated (eg, chronic hypertension) preterm birth, who were randomized to either 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate treatment or a placebo. Risk factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth within the entire cohort were identified by univariable analysis. Factors significantly associated (P < .05) with spontaneous preterm birth were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine whether an accurate prediction model could be developed.
RESULTS: Of the 657 randomized patients, 109 (16.6%) had spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks' gestation. Logistic regression analysis revealed only cervical length (odds ratio, 1.06 per 1-mm decrease; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.10) to be associated with spontaneous preterm birth. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve based on this regression was low (0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.69). Results were similar for the outcome of spontaneous preterm birth before 34 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: An accurate prediction model for spontaneous preterm birth among nulliparous women with a short cervix could not be developed.
© 2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical length; obstetric ultrasound; prediction; spontaneous preterm birth

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27151903      PMCID: PMC5086428          DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.08035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  13 in total

1.  Cervical length at 16-22 weeks' gestation and risk for preterm delivery.

Authors:  J U Hibbard; M Tart; A H Moawad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix.

Authors:  Eduardo B Fonseca; Ebru Celik; Mauro Parra; Mandeep Singh; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in nulliparas with cervical length less than 30 mm.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Elizabeth A Thom; Catherine Y Spong; Jay D Iams; George R Saade; Brian M Mercer; Alan T N Tita; Dwight J Rouse; Yoram Sorokin; Ronald J Wapner; Kenneth J Leveno; Sean Blackwell; M Sean Esplin; Jorge E Tolosa; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; J Peter Van Dorsten
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Biomarkers of spontaneous preterm birth: an overview of the literature in the last four decades.

Authors:  Ramkumar Menon; Maria Regina Torloni; Chiara Voltolini; Michela Torricelli; Mario Merialdi; Ana Pilar Betrán; Mariana Widmer; Tomas Allen; Iulia Davydova; Zulfiya Khodjaeva; Poul Thorsen; Marian Kacerovsky; Vojtìch Tambor; Tytti Massinen; Judith Nace; Chander Arora
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Midtrimester intra-amniotic sludge and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Eric Himaya; Nadia Rhalmi; Mario Girard; Amélie Tétu; Josée Desgagné; Belkacem Abdous; Jean Gekas; Yves Giguère; Emmanuel Bujold
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18-22 weeks' gestation and the risk of preterm delivery.

Authors:  P Taipale; V Hiilesmaa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Activity restriction among women with a short cervix.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Sharon A Gilbert; Jay D Iams; Catherine Y Spong; George Saade; Brian M Mercer; Alan T N Tita; Dwight J Rouse; Yoram Sorokin; Kenneth J Leveno; Jorge E Tolosa; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; J Peter Van Dorsten
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  Allison S Bryant; Ayaba Worjoloh; Aaron B Caughey; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The utility of screening for historical risk factors for preterm birth in women with known second trimester cervical length.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Mella; A Dhanya Mackeen; Doinita Gache; Jason K Baxter; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-01-09

Review 10.  Additional effects of the cervical length measurement in women with preterm contractions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jolande Y Vis; Rosanna A Kuin; William A Grobman; Ben Willem J Mol; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Brent C Opmeer
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.344

View more
  9 in total

1.  Clinical risk models for preterm birth less than 28 weeks and less than 32 weeks of gestation using a large retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Reza Arabi Belaghi; Joseph Beyene; Sarah D McDonald
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 2.  Predicting preterm birth: Cervical length and fetal fibronectin.

Authors:  Moeun Son; Emily S Miller
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Timing of antenatal steroid administration for imminent preterm birth: results of a prospective observational study in Germany.

Authors:  Charlotte Humbeck; Sinje Jonassen; Arne Bringewatt; Mascha Pervan; Achim Rody; Verena Bossung
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Probing the potential of mucus permeability to signify preterm birth risk.

Authors:  K B Smith-Dupont; C E Wagner; J Witten; K Conroy; H Rudoltz; K Pagidas; V Snegovskikh; M House; K Ribbeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Timely Administration of Antenatal Steroids Is Highly Protective Against Intraventricular Hemorrhage: An Observational Multicenter Cohort Study of Very Low Birth Weight Infants.

Authors:  Ingmar Fortmann; Luisa Mertens; Hannah Boeckel; Berthold Grüttner; Alexander Humberg; Mariana Astiz; Claudia Roll; Isabell Rickleffs; Achim Rody; Christoph Härtel; Egbert Herting; Wolfgang Göpel; Verena Bossung
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Maternal preterm birth prediction in the United States: a case-control database study.

Authors:  Yan Li; Xiaoyu Fu; Xinmeng Guo; Huili Liang; Dongru Cao; Junmei Shi
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.567

7.  Prediction of preterm birth in nulliparous women using logistic regression and machine learning.

Authors:  Reza Arabi Belaghi; Joseph Beyene; Sarah D McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Subsequent pregnancy outcomes according to the presence of acute histologic chorioamnionitis in women with spontaneous preterm delivery.

Authors:  Nam-Kyeong Kim; Yae Ji Choi; Subeen Hong; Jee Yoon Park; Kyung Joon Oh; Joon-Seok Hong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-02-07

9.  Serum Decorin, Biglycan, and Extracellular Matrix Component Expression in Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Jenna M Mennella; Lori A Underhill; Sophia Collis; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; Richard Tucker; Beatrice E Lechner
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.060

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.