OBJECTIVE: To determine the origin and properties of short latency extraocular potentials produced by activation of the vestibular apparatus using two modes of acoustic stimulation. METHODS: Extraocular potentials were measured in 10 normal subjects using a bipolar montage to increase selectivity. Three dimensional eye movements were also recorded in five subjects. The subjects were stimulated with both air-conducted (AC) and bone-conducted (BC) sound using a single cycle of a 500Hz sine wave. RESULTS: Short latency positive and negative potentials that peaked at 8.1-12.7ms for AC and 7.5-13.9ms for BC stimulation were recorded, which were distinct for the two eyes and for the two modes of stimulation. The extraocular potentials began prior to the onset of eye movements, which peaked at 16.5-20.1ms for AC, 17.8-25.0ms for BC stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of short latency eye movements and extraocular potentials induced by AC and BC vestibular stimulation are distinct. As the potentials preceded the eye movements and were not correlated morphologically with them, the source of the observed potentials is not an eye movement and thus we refer to them as ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs). SIGNIFICANCE: The potentials had properties consistent with modulation of the electromyogenic activity of the extraocular muscles and if interpreted as originating from displacement of the eye will give misleading results. AC and BC acoustic stimulation are likely to activate differing profiles of vestibular end organs.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the origin and properties of short latency extraocular potentials produced by activation of the vestibular apparatus using two modes of acoustic stimulation. METHODS: Extraocular potentials were measured in 10 normal subjects using a bipolar montage to increase selectivity. Three dimensional eye movements were also recorded in five subjects. The subjects were stimulated with both air-conducted (AC) and bone-conducted (BC) sound using a single cycle of a 500Hz sine wave. RESULTS: Short latency positive and negative potentials that peaked at 8.1-12.7ms for AC and 7.5-13.9ms for BC stimulation were recorded, which were distinct for the two eyes and for the two modes of stimulation. The extraocular potentials began prior to the onset of eye movements, which peaked at 16.5-20.1ms for AC, 17.8-25.0ms for BC stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of short latency eye movements and extraocular potentials induced by AC and BC vestibular stimulation are distinct. As the potentials preceded the eye movements and were not correlated morphologically with them, the source of the observed potentials is not an eye movement and thus we refer to them as ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs). SIGNIFICANCE: The potentials had properties consistent with modulation of the electromyogenic activity of the extraocular muscles and if interpreted as originating from displacement of the eye will give misleading results. AC and BC acoustic stimulation are likely to activate differing profiles of vestibular end organs.
Authors: Swee Tin Aw; Grace Elizabeth Aw; Michael John Todd; Andrew Philip Bradshaw; Gabor Michael Halmagyi Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2011-06-01
Authors: Sendhil Govender; Sally M Rosengren; Danielle L Dennis; Louis J Z Lim; James G Colebatch Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Miriam S Welgampola; Americo A Migliaccio; Oluwaseun A Myrie; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 3.708