| Literature DB >> 27149859 |
Lorenzo Signori1, Diletta Ami1,2,3, Riccardo Posteri1, Andrea Giuzzi1, Paolo Mereghetti4, Danilo Porro1, Paola Branduardi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MicrobialEntities:
Keywords: Crude glycerol; Cryptococcus curvatus; Fatty acids methyl esters (FAME); Flow-cytometry; Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) microspectroscopy; Lipomyces starkeyi; Principal component analysis (PCA); Rhodosporidium toruloides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27149859 PMCID: PMC4858929 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0467-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Growth profiles of R. toruloides, C. curvatus and L. starkeyi shake flasks cultivated with different concentrations of pure and crude glycerol. Growth curves (OD660 nm) of R. toruloides (a), C. curvatus (b) and L. starkeyi (c) cells at 25 °C and 220 rpm. Glycerol was used as sole carbon source at the final concentration of 100 g L−1. Five different mix of pure and crude glycerol were evaluated: 100 % pure glycerol (A dashed line and unfilled square), 80 % pure and 20 % crude glycerol (B continuous line and filled circle), 70 % pure and 30 % crude glycerol (C continuous line and filled triangle), 50 % pure and 50 % crude glycerol (D continuous line and filled diamond) and 100 % crude glycerol (E continuous line and filled square). Data are mean ± standard deviation (error bars) of three independent assays
Fig. 2Glycerol consumption and growth (CDW) profiles of R. toruloides, C. curvatus and L. starkeyi under fed-batch cultivation. Growth (CDW; g L−1) and glycerol consumption profiles (g L−1) of R. toruloides (a), C. curvatus (b) and L. starkeyi (c) cultivated on pure (dashed line) and crude (continuous line) glycerol. Data are mean ± standard deviation (error bars) of three independent assays
Comparison of parameters related to biomass and lipid production among R. toruloides, C. curvatus and L. starkeyi grown on pure and crude glycerol
| Yeast | Carbon source | Maximum DW (g L−1) | Biomass productivity (g L−1 h−1)a | Biomass yield (g g−1) | Glycerol uptake rate (g L−1 h−1)a | Lipid (%) | Lipid productivity (g L−1 h−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Pure glycerol | 40.4 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.73 | 60.9 | 0.13 |
| Crude glycerol | 41.0 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.98 | 60.0 | 0.15 | |
|
| Pure glycerol | 43.7 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 46.9 | 0.10 |
| Crude glycerol | 45.1 | 0.18 | 0.37 | 0.48 | 50.9 | 0.09 | |
|
| Pure glycerol | 31.4 | 0.31 | 0.26 | 1.03 | 48.2 | 0.10 |
| Crude glycerol | 32.7 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 1.05 | 55.9 | 0.13 |
Data shown are the mean of three independent experiments where the deviation from the mean value was less than 5 %
aBiomass productivity as well as glycerol uptake rate were calculated starting to the end of the feeding
Literature-cited results of R. toruloides, C. curvatus and L. starkeyi strains cultivated on various crude glycerol-based media during growth under various fermentation configurations and their comparisons with the present study
| Strain | Carbon source | Nitrogen source | Dry weight (g L−1) | Lipid (%) | Lipid productivity (g L−1 h−1) | Cultivation mode | Glycerol (g L−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Crude glycerol | Hydrolysate from rapeseed meal | 31.1 | 41.7 | 0.11 | Fed-batch; 1-L bioreactor | – | [ |
| 19.3 | 43.0 | 0.07 | Batch; 1-L bioreactor | 100 | ||||
| Pure glycerol | 35.3 | 46.0 | 0.14 | Batch; 1-L bioreactor | 100 | |||
| 43.0 | 45.8 | 0.17 | Batch; 1-L bioreactor | 100 | ||||
|
| Crude glycerol | Peptone and yeast extract | 20.3 | 42.5 | 0.07 | Flask | 100 | [ |
| Pure glycerol | 21.1 | 40.3 | 0.07 | Flask | 100 | |||
|
| Crude glycerol | (NH4)2SO4 and yeast extract | 19.2 | 47.7 | 0.06 | Flask | 50 | [ |
| 20.1 | 42.9 | 0.05 | Flask | 50 | ||||
| 26.7 | 69.5 | 0.09a | Batch; 5-L bioreactor | 60 | ||||
| 18.00 | 74.1 | 0.07a | Batch; 5-L bioreactor | 60 | ||||
|
| Crude glycerol | Peptone and yeast extract | 30.1 | 40.0 | 0.03 | Flask | 120 | [ |
| 23.8 | 47.0 | 0.04 | Flask | 95 | ||||
|
| Crude glycerol | SFM hydrolysate | 47.9 | 37.8 | 0.14 | Fed-batch; 3.6-L bioreactor | – | [ |
| PSFM hydrolysate | 37.4 | 51.3 | 0.17 | Fed-batch; 3.6-L bioreactor | – | |||
|
| Crude glycerol | Corn steep liquor, baker’s yeast autolysate and malt extract | 50.4 | 45.0 | 0.17 | Fed-batch; 30-L bioreactor | – | [ |
| 58.9 | 43.0 | 0.19 | Fed-batch; 6-L bioreactor | – | ||||
| 52.3 | 43.0 | 0.16 | Fed-batch; 6-L bioreactor | – | ||||
| 69.2 | 40.0 | 0.24 | Fed-batch; 6-L bioreactor | – | ||||
|
| Crude glycerol | Yeast extract | 32.9 | 52.9 | 0.06 | Two-stage fed-batch; 2-L biorector | – | [ |
|
| Crude glycerol | SFM hydrolysate | 38.0 | 47.1 | 0.09 | Fed-batch; 3.6-L bioreactor | – | [ |
| PSFM hydrolysate | 34.6 | 50.0 | 0.11 | Fed-batch; 3.6-L bioreactor | – | |||
|
| Crude glycerol | Peptone and yeast extract | 34.4 | 35.9 | 0.03 | Flask | 120 | [ |
| 23.3 | 35.0 | 0.02 | Flask | 100 | ||||
|
| Pure glycerol | (NH4)2SO4 and yeast extract | 40.4 | 60.9 | 0.13 | Batch with feeding; 2-L biorector | 100 | This study |
| Crude glycerol | 41.0 | 60.0 | 0.15 | Batch with feeding; 2-L biorector | 100 | |||
|
| Pure glycerol | (NH4)2SO4 and yeast extract | 43.7 | 46.9 | 0.10 | Batch with feeding; 2-L bioreactor | 100 | This study |
| Crude glycerol | 45.1 | 50.9 | 0.09 | Batch with feeding; 2-L biorector | 100 | |||
|
| Pure glycerol | (NH4)2SO4 and yeast extract | 31.4 | 48.2 | 0.10 | Batch with feeding; 2-L biorector | 100 | This study |
| Crude glycerol | 32.7 | 55.9 | 0.13 | Batch with feeding; 2-L biorector | 100 |
aCalculated considering fermentation time 195 h
Fig. 3Flow-cytometry analysis of R. toruloides, C. curvatus and L. starkeyi. Overlaid histograms of R. toruloides (a), C. curvatus (b) and L. starkeyi (c) cells grown on pure (left panels) and crude glycerol (right panels) stained with Nile Red and analyzed through flow-cytometry after 28, 48, 72, 144, 192 (only R. toruloides and C. curvatus) and 240 h (only C. curvatus). The fluorescence emission was measured in the FL3 channel (>650 nm corresponding to polar lipids). For each condition, an example of control (cells not stained) is reported. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments, where the deviation from the X mean value was always less than 5 %
Fig. 4Fluorescence microscope analysis of R. toruloides, C. curvatus and L. starkeyi. R. toruloides (a), C. curvatus (b) and L. starkeyi (c) cells were stained with Nile Red and observed under the microscope after 28, 72, 144 h. For each condition, fluorescence images and the corresponding dichroic image is reported. Since no significant differences in lipid bodies shape and number were observed between samples derived from pure and crude glycerol cultivations, the images here reported refers only to the first condition. Bar indicates 10 μm
Fig. 5Time dependence of fatty acid production by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) microspectroscopy analysis. Time dependence of the CHx stretching band area (a) and of the ester C = O (b) of S. cerevisiae (filled diamond), R. toruloides (filled square), C. curvatus (filled circle) and L. starkeyi (filled triangle) cells growing on pure (dashed lines) and crude glycerol (continuous lines). Values were normalized for the total protein content given by the amide I band area
Fig. 6Average percentage changes of the selected fatty acids in intact cells. PCA results, obtained by the analysis of the FTIR spectra of intact cells, are summarized as percentage changes averaged across the three ranges ( see “Methods” section for details), for R. toruloides, L. starkeyi, C. curvatus grown on pure glycerol (left panel) and crude glycerol (right panel). The larger the value, the more a lipid standard contributes to the spectral profile changes of the sample at 144 h compared to the time 0. In addition, the average (across range) value of the gas chromatographic (GC) data is shown scaled in the range 0–100 for comparison. Error bars indicate the bootstrapped 95 % confidence intervals
Fig. 7FTIR analysis of yeast cell wall modifications during lipid accumulation. The second derivatives of the FTIR spectra of yeast cells are reported in the spectral range comprised between 1200–950 cm−1, mainly ascribable to the absorption of cell wall carbohydrates. Spectra of control (a) and oleaginous yeasts C. curvatus (b) R. toruloides (c), and L. starkeyi (d) are displayed at time 0 and at 144 h of growth in crude and pure glycerol. For comparison, the second derivative spectra have been normalized at the tyrosine band at ~1516 cm−1
Gas chromatography analysis of R. toruloides, C. curvatus and L. starkeyi lipids produced using crude and pure glycerol as a sole carbon source
| Yeast | Carbon source | Fatty acids composition (% wt/wt) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C 14:0 | C 16:0 | C 16:1 | C 18:0 | C 18:1 | C 18:2 | C 18:3 | Other | S | M | P | ||
|
| Pure glycerol | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 27.9 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 12.3 ± 0.1 | 35.3 ± 0.1 | 17.4 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 42.4 ± 0.2 | 37.4 ± 0.1 | 20.2 ± 0.2 |
| Crude glycerol | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 27.5 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 12.5 ± 0.2 | 37.8 ± 0.1 | 15.8 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 42.2 ± 0.1 | 39.8 ± 0.4 | 18.0 ± 0.3 | |
|
| Pure glycerol | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 29.6 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 0.1 | 27.6 ± 0.2 | 14.9 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 51.9 ± 0.1 | 31.3 ± 0.1 | 16.8 ± 0.2 |
| Crude glycerol | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 30.6 ± 0.1 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | 15.4 ± 0.1 | 31.2 ± 0.1 | 14.5 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 48.7 ± 0.4 | 35.2 ± 0.4 | 16.1 ± 0.1 | |
|
| Pure glycerol | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 31.0 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 12.9 ± 0.1 | 39.4 ± 0.3 | 7.6 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 48.2 ± 0.4 | 43.7 ± 0.3 | 8.1 ± 0.1 |
| Crude glycerol | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 32.2 ± 0.1 | 4.2 ± 0.1 | 10.9 ± 0.1 | 40.9 ± 0.1 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 47.1 ± 0.1 | 45.1 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.2 | |
Peak areas less than 0.3 % were considered insignificant
Data are mean ± standard deviation of three independent assays
S saturated; M monounsaturated; P polyunsaturated