| Literature DB >> 22646719 |
Mahesh Khot1, Srijay Kamat, Smita Zinjarde, Aditi Pant, Balu Chopade, Ameeta Ravikumar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Single cell oils (SCOs) accumulated by oleaginous fungi have emerged as a potential alternative feedstock for biodiesel production. Though fungi from mangrove ecosystem have been reported for production of several lignocellulolytic enzymes, they remain unexplored for their SCO producing ability. Thus, these oleaginous fungi from the mangrove ecosystem could be suitable candidates for production of SCOs from lignocellulosic biomass. The accumulation of lipids being species specific, strain selection is critical and therefore, it is of importance to evaluate the fungal diversity of mangrove wetlands. The whole cells of these fungi were investigated with respect to oleaginicity, cell mass, lipid content, fatty acid methyl ester profiles and physicochemical properties of transesterified SCOs in order to explore their potential for biodiesel production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22646719 PMCID: PMC3442963 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-71
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Figure 1Microscopic photographs of Nile red fluorescence of fungal isolates from mangrove wetlands.A) IBB B2; B) IBB F14; C) IBB G4; D) IBB G5; E) IBB M1. In the photomicrographs, the intracellular lipid bodies of hyphal cells showing fluorescence after Nile red staining are indicated by white arrows. Bar indicates 50 μm.
Biomass and SCO yields of oleaginous fungal isolates from mangrove wetlands of Indian west coast
| IBB B2 | Mycelial | 4.27 ± 0.1a | 0.11 ± 0.02ab | 0.25 ± 0.01a | 0.47 ± 0.02a | 1.07 ± 0.1a |
| IBB F14 | Mycelial | 4.14 ± 0.3a | 0.15 ± 0.02ab | 0.28 ± 0.01a | 0.62 ± 0.01a | 1.16 ± 0.3ab |
| IBB G4 | Mycelial | 5.84 ± 0.5bc | 0.17 ± 0.04b | 0.30 ± 0.05a | 0.99 ± 0.02b | 1.75 ± 0.2bc |
| IBB G5 | Mycelial | 6.44 ± 0.3c | 0.09 ± 0.01a | 0.30 ± 0.03a | 0.57 ± 0.02a | 1.93 ± 0.2c |
| IBB M1 | Mycelial | 5.52 ± 0.2b | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 0.54 ± 0.03b | 0.552 ± 0.3a | 2.98 ± 0.3d |
* CDW - cell dry weight determined after 72 h.
# Lipid extractions carried out by two different cell lysis techniques as mentioned in Methods.
The data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a,b,c Mean values within a column with different superscript letters differ significantly and were determined statistically as mentioned in Methods (one way ANOVA, Tukey, p < 0.05). Separate analysis was done for each column.
Figure 2Total lipid and neutral lipid contents of oleaginous fungi from tropical mangrove wetlands. The data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). A, B, C Mean values for total lipid content (wt %) with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05) and were determined as mentioned in Methods. a,b,c Mean values for neutral lipid content (wt %) with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05) and were determined as mentioned in Methods.
Fatty acid methyl ester composition of the SCOs of oleaginous mangrove fungal isolates
| IBB B2 | 0.2 | ND | 0.2 a | 0.5 ac | 0.2 | 21ab | 2.8 a | 0.3 a | ND | 13.6 ab | 34.5 a | 23.3 a | 0.5 a | 0.7 ab | 0.1 a | 0.3 a | 0.1 a | 0.8 a | 0.9 a | 100 |
| IBB F14 | ND | ND | 0.4 b | 0.4 ab | ND | 29.2 bc | 0.2 b | ND | ND | 20.6 bc | 32.5 a | 14.7 b | ND | 1.1 bc | ND | ND | ND | 0.5 a | 0.4 a | 100 |
| IBB G4 | ND | ND | ND | 0.6 c | ND | 36 c | 1 b | ND | ND | 10.7 a | 41.3 a | 8.7 b | 0.1 b | 0.5 a | 0.1 a | ND | 0.2 a | 0.5 a | 0.2 a | 99.9 |
| IBB G5 | ND | ND | ND | 0.6 c | ND | 24.3 ab | 1.1 ab | 0.5 a | ND | 15.7 ab | 31.8 a | 21.70 a | 0.6 a | 1.4 c | ND | 1 a | ND | 0.6 a | 0.7 a | 100 |
| IBB M1 | ND | ND | ND | 0.3 b | ND | 20.1 a | 0.4 b | 0.5 a | ND | 23.6 c | 30.1 a | 22.3 a | 0.4 ab | 0.8 ab | 0.1 a | ND | 0.3 a | 0.4 a | 0.7 a | 100 |
The values are means of three independent determinations. a,b,c Mean values within a column with different superscript letters differ significantly and were determined using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey and/or t-test as mentioned in Methods. Differences were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05, n = 3. Separate analysis was done for each column.
C14:0 -Myristate C16:1-Palmitoleate C18:1- Oleate C18:3-Linolenate C22:0-Behenate.
C16:0 -Palmitate C18:0-Stearate C18:2-Linoleate C20:0-Arachidate C24:0-Lignocerate.
ND not detected.
TFA Total weight % of FAMEs detected and quantified by GC-FID.
Biodiesel properties of the transesterified SCOs of oleaginous fungi from mangrove wetlands
| Density * (g.cm-3) | 0.825 a | 0.870 b | 0.860 b | 0.810 a | 0.875 b | NS | 0.86 – 0.90 | 0.86 – 0.90 |
| (0.857) | (0.865) | (0.865) | (0.855) | (0.865) | ||||
| Kinematic viscosity# (40 °C; mm2s-1) | 4.52 | 4.69 | 4.55 | 4.55 | 4.68 | 1.9 – 6.0 | 3.5 – 5.0 | 3.5 – 5.0 |
| SN * | 195 a | 217 b | 201 a | 190 a | 200 a | NS | NS | NS |
| (193.2) | (193.2) | (195.3) | (193.0) | (192.1) | ||||
| IV * | 91.5 a | 60.28 b | 73.0 c | 76.30 c | 54.81 b | NS | 120max | NS |
| (74.9) | (53.4) | (52.5) | (69.7) | (67) | ||||
| HHV (MJ kg -1)** | 40.06 | 39.63 | 40.09 | 40.49 | 40.40 | NS | NS | NS |
| (40.38) | (40.7) | (40.6) | (40.47) | (40.55) | ||||
| CN # | 56.22 | 61.24 | 61.2 | 57.815 | 58.42 | 47-65 | 51 min | 51 min |
| TAN (mg KOH/g) * | ND | ND | 0.2 a | 0.1 b | 0.1 b | 0.8 max | 0.5 max | 0.5 max |
| FFA (%)* | ND | ND | 0.1 a | 0.05 a | 0.05 a | NS | NS | NS |
| Concentration of linolenic acid (C18:3) (%) * | 0.5 a | ND | 0.1 b | 0.6 a | 0.4 ab | NS | 12 max | NS |
| FAME having ≥4 double bonds (%)* | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | NS | 1 max | NS |
The experimental values are means of three independent determinations. a,b,c Mean values within a row with different superscript letters differ significantly and were determined as mentioned in Methods (ANOVA, Tukey, p < 0.05). Separate analysis was done for each row.
ND not detected; NS not specified.
* Experimentally determined values followed by predicted ones, if any, in brackets.
# Predicted values as mentioned in Methods.
** Calculated using experimental SN and IV while the values in brackets determined from predicted ones.
Growth and lipid (SCO) yields by strain IBB M1 at differing initial glucose concentrations
| 10 | 4.6 ± 0.3 a | 2.28 ± 0.09 a | 0.49 ± 0.03 a | 0.16 ± 0.02a | 0.23 ± 0.01 a |
| 30 | 5.5 ± 0.1 b | 3.00 ± 0.13 b | 0.54 ± 0.02 a | 0.18 ±0.01 ab | 0.10 ± 0.03 b |
| 50 | 5.3 ± 0.2 bc | 2.60 ± 0.1 a | 0.49 ± 0.02 a | 0.18 ±0.01 ab | 0.05 ± 0.01c |
| 70 | 4.9 ± 0.1 ac | 2.35 ± 0.08 a | 0.48 ± 0.05 a | 0.19 ± 0.009 b | 0.03 ± 0.009 c |
| 100 | 4.0 ± 0.3 d | 1.93 ± 0.2 c | 0.48 ± 0.04 a | 0.25 ±0.014 c | 0.02 ± 0.01 c |
The data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a,b,c Mean values within a column with different superscript letters differ significantly were determined as mentioned in Methods (ANOVA, Tukey test). Differences were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05. Separate analysis was done for each column.
* CDW- Cell Dry Weight.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy of fungal isolateIBB M1 showing morphological features.A) Surface of the fungal colony showing conidiophores arising from the basal network of vegetative hyphae at 150X (Bar indicates 30 μm); B) Conidial heads bearing conidia in compact columnar arrangement at 1.10 K X (Bar indicates 10 μm); C) Conidia at 4.0 K X (Bar indicates 1 μm).