Literature DB >> 27147083

Intraventricular etoposide safety and toxicity profile in children and young adults with refractory or recurrent malignant brain tumors.

Kristian W Pajtler1,2, Stephan Tippelt3, Nele Siegler3, Stefanie Reichling4, Martina Zimmermann4, Ruth Mikasch3, Udo Bode4, Astrid Gnekow5, Torsten Pietsch6, Martin Benesch7, Stefan Rutkowski8, Gudrun Fleischhack3.   

Abstract

Systemic administration of etoposide is effective in treating metastatic, recurrent or refractory brain tumors, but penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid is extremely poor. This study was designed to determine the safety and toxicity profile of intraventricular etoposide administration and was affiliated with the prospective, multicenter, nonblinded, nonrandomized, multi-armed HIT-REZ-97 trial. The study enrolled 68 patients, aged 1.1-34.6 (median age 11 years). Adverse events that could possibly be related to intraventricular etoposide therapy were documented and analyzed. Intraventricular etoposide was simultaneously administered with either oral or intravenous chemotherapy in 426 courses according to three major schedules varying in dosing (0.25-1 mg), frequency of administration (bolus injection, every 12 or 24 h), course duration (5-10 days) and length of interval between courses (2-5 weeks). Potential treatment-related adverse effects included transient headache, seizures, infection of the reservoir, nausea and neuropsychological symptoms. Hematological side effects were not observed. One patient, with history of multiple prior therapies, who received long-term intraventricular and oral etoposide treatment developed acute myeloid leukemia as a secondary malignancy. Overall intraventricular etoposide is well tolerated. The results of this study have warranted a phase II trial to determine the effectiveness of this regimen in disease stages with very limited therapeutic options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATRT; Ependymoma; Medulloblastoma; Pediatric brain tumors; Progression; Relapse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27147083     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2133-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  34 in total

1.  Treatment of young children with localized medulloblastoma by chemotherapy alone: results of the prospective, multicenter trial HIT 2000 confirming the prognostic impact of histology.

Authors:  André O von Bueren; Katja von Hoff; Torsten Pietsch; Nicolas U Gerber; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Frank Deinlein; Isabella Zwiener; Andreas Faldum; Gudrun Fleischhack; Martin Benesch; Juergen Krauss; Joachim Kuehl; Rolf D Kortmann; Stefan Rutkowski
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Response of recurrent medulloblastoma to low-dose oral etoposide.

Authors:  D M Ashley; L Meier; T Kerby; F M Zalduondo; H S Friedman; A Gajjar; L Kun; P K Duffner; S Smith; D Longee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Ependymal tumors in childhood.

Authors:  Fulya Yaman Agaoglu; Inci Ayan; Yavuz Dizdar; Rejin Kebudi; Omer Gorgun; Emin Darendeliler
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 4.  The new WHO classification of brain tumours.

Authors:  P Kleihues; P C Burger; B W Scheithauer
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.508

5.  Safety and toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine (Depocyte) in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory brain tumors: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Authors:  Martin Benesch; Nele Siegler; Katja von Hoff; Lisa Lassay; Gabriele Kropshofer; Hermann Müller; Constanze Sommer; Stefan Rutkowski; Gudrun Fleischhack; Christian Urban
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.248

6.  Phase I trial of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children with neoplastic meningitis.

Authors:  L Bomgaars; J R Geyer; J Franklin; G Dahl; J Park; N J Winick; R Klenke; S L Berg; S M Blaney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Reirradiation of recurrent medulloblastoma: does clinical benefit outweigh risk for toxicity?

Authors:  Cynthia Wetmore; Danielle Herington; Tong Lin; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Amar Gajjar; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Mechanism of generation of therapy related leukemia in response to anti-topoisomerase II agents.

Authors:  Ian G Cowell; Caroline A Austin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Subsequent neoplasms in 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Debra L Friedman; John Whitton; Wendy Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Sue Hammond; Marilyn Stovall; Sarah S Donaldson; Anna T Meadows; Leslie L Robison; Joseph P Neglia
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 11.816

10.  Feasibility of intraventricular administration of etoposide in patients with metastatic brain tumours.

Authors:  G Fleischhack; S Reif; C Hasan; U Jaehde; S Hettmer; U Bode
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system involvement in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Kjeld Schmiegelow; Christina Halsey; Maria Thastrup; Alasdair Duguid; Christian Mirian
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 12.883

2.  Phase II study of intravenous etoposide in patients with relapsed ependymoma (CNS 2001 04).

Authors:  John R Apps; Shanna Maycock; David W Ellison; Timothy Jaspan; Timothy A Ritzmann; Donald Macarthur; Conor Mallucci; Keith Wheatley; Gareth J Veal; Richard G Grundy; Susan Picton
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-04-13

3.  Rotating Magnetic Nanoparticle Clusters as Microdevices for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Alexander J Willis; Sebastian P Pernal; Zachary A Gaertner; Sajani S Lakka; Michael E Sabo; Francis M Creighton; Herbert H Engelhard
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-06-11

4.  Etoposide-Bound Magnetic Nanoparticles Designed for Remote Targeting of Cancer Cells Disseminated Within Cerebrospinal Fluid Pathways.

Authors:  Herbert H Engelhard; Alexander J Willis; Syed I Hussain; Georgia Papavasiliou; David J Banner; Amanda Kwasnicki; Sajani S Lakka; Sangyeul Hwang; Tolou Shokuhfar; Sean C Morris; Bing Liu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Relapsed Medulloblastoma in Pre-Irradiated Patients: Current Practice for Diagnostics and Treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca M Hill; Sabine L A Plasschaert; Beate Timmermann; Christelle Dufour; Kristian Aquilina; Shivaram Avula; Laura Donovan; Maarten Lequin; Torsten Pietsch; Ulrich Thomale; Stephan Tippelt; Pieter Wesseling; Stefan Rutkowski; Steven C Clifford; Stefan M Pfister; Simon Bailey; Gudrun Fleischhack
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Hemophagocytic Syndrome Complicated with Dermatomyositis Controlled Successfully with Infliximab and Conventional Therapies.

Authors:  Yoji Komiya; Tetsuya Saito; Fumitaka Mizoguchi; Hitoshi Kohsaka
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.271

Review 7.  Temozolomide and oral etoposide in children with recurrent malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Antonio Ruggiero; Anna Ariano; Silvia Triarico; Michele Antonio Capozza; Alberto Romano; Palma Maurizi; Stefano Mastrangelo; Giorgio Attinà
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2020-06-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.