Literature DB >> 19617818

Safety and toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine (Depocyte) in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory brain tumors: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Martin Benesch1, Nele Siegler, Katja von Hoff, Lisa Lassay, Gabriele Kropshofer, Hermann Müller, Constanze Sommer, Stefan Rutkowski, Gudrun Fleischhack, Christian Urban.   

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine (Depocyte) in children and adolescents with refractory or recurrent brain tumors. Nineteen heavily pretreated patients (males, n = 14; females, n = 5; median age at diagnosis 8.5 years; range, 1.4-22 years) were given intrathecal liposomal cytarabine on a compassionate use basis for recurrent refractory medulloblastoma (n = 12), mixed germ cell tumor (n = 2), central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the pons (n = 1), anaplastic ependymoma (n = 1), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (n = 1), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (n = 1), or rhabdoid papillary meningioma (n = 1). Eighteen patients received concomitant systemic radiochemotherapy. A total of 88 intrathecal injections of liposomal cytarabine (dose range, 20-50 mg) were administered with concomitant dexamethasone prophylaxis. The median number of doses per patient was four (range, 1-10). Duration of treatment ranged from (1/2) to 10 months. Eleven patients (57.9%) did not show any side effects, whereas eight patients (42.1%) developed side effects related to either chemical arachnoiditis (n = 4) or neurological progression (n = 2). Less typical treatment-related symptoms (e.g. lethargy, ataxia, and slurred speech) were observed in two patients. Treatment with intrathecal liposomal cytarabine was discontinued twice because of side effects. In conclusion, although intrathecal liposomal cytarabine was generally well tolerated, it should be used cautiously and only with dexamethasone prophylaxis in extensively pretreated patients with recurrent brain tumors. Proof of efficacy requires a prospective single-agent phase II study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19617818     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e32832f4abe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  14 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the neurovascular unit for treatment of neurological disorders.

Authors:  Reyna L Vangilder; Charles L Rosen; Taura L Barr; Jason D Huber
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 12.310

2.  Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children and adolescents following age-adapted dosing.

Authors:  Andreas Peyrl; Robert Sauermann; Monika Chocholous; Amedeo A Azizi; Walter Jäger; Martina Höferl; Irene Slavc
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Liposomal cytarabine for central nervous system embryonal tumors in children and young adults.

Authors:  Sonia Partap; Patricia A Murphy; Hannes Vogel; Patrick D Barnes; Michael S B Edwards; Paul G Fisher
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Neurologic complications after intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in combination with systemic polychemotherapy in primary CNS lymphoma.

Authors:  Kathrin Ostermann; Hendrik Pels; Annika Kowoll; Jan Kuhnhenn; Uwe Schlegel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  The leptomeninges as a critical organ for normal CNS development and function: First patient and public involved systematic review of arachnoiditis (chronic meningitis).

Authors:  Carol S Palackdkharry; Stephanie Wottrich; Erin Dienes; Mohamad Bydon; Michael P Steinmetz; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Liposomal cytarabine in neoplastic meningitis from primary brain tumors: a single institutional experience.

Authors:  P Gaviani; E Corsini; A Salmaggi; E Lamperti; A Botturi; A Erbetta; I Milanesi; F Legnani; B Pollo; A Silvani
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Intraventricular etoposide safety and toxicity profile in children and young adults with refractory or recurrent malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Kristian W Pajtler; Stephan Tippelt; Nele Siegler; Stefanie Reichling; Martina Zimmermann; Ruth Mikasch; Udo Bode; Astrid Gnekow; Torsten Pietsch; Martin Benesch; Stefan Rutkowski; Gudrun Fleischhack
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.

Authors:  M J Fowler; J D Cotter; B E Knight; E M Sevick-Muraca; D I Sandberg; R W Sirianni
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Self-assembled squalenoyl-cytarabine nanostructures as a potent nanomedicine for treatment of leukemic diseases.

Authors:  Donato Cosco; Flavio Rocco; Maurizio Ceruti; Margherita Vono; Massimo Fresta; Donatella Paolino
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-05-23

Review 10.  Neurotoxic Effects of Childhood Cancer Therapy and Its Potential Neurocognitive Impact.

Authors:  Nicholas S Phillips; Elizabeth S Duke; Hannah-Lise T Schofield; Nicole J Ullrich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 50.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.