Literature DB >> 27147027

Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments.

Paul Raccuglia1, Katherine C Elbert1, Philip D F Adler1, Casey Falk1, Malia B Wenny1, Aurelio Mollo1, Matthias Zeller2, Sorelle A Friedler1, Joshua Schrier1, Alexander J Norquist1.   

Abstract

Inorganic-organic hybrid materials such as organically templated metal oxides, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and organohalide perovskites have been studied for decades, and hydrothermal and (non-aqueous) solvothermal syntheses have produced thousands of new materials that collectively contain nearly all the metals in the periodic table. Nevertheless, the formation of these compounds is not fully understood, and development of new compounds relies primarily on exploratory syntheses. Simulation- and data-driven approaches (promoted by efforts such as the Materials Genome Initiative) provide an alternative to experimental trial-and-error. Three major strategies are: simulation-based predictions of physical properties (for example, charge mobility, photovoltaic properties, gas adsorption capacity or lithium-ion intercalation) to identify promising target candidates for synthetic efforts; determination of the structure-property relationship from large bodies of experimental data, enabled by integration with high-throughput synthesis and measurement tools; and clustering on the basis of similar crystallographic structure (for example, zeolite structure classification or gas adsorption properties). Here we demonstrate an alternative approach that uses machine-learning algorithms trained on reaction data to predict reaction outcomes for the crystallization of templated vanadium selenites. We used information on 'dark' reactions--failed or unsuccessful hydrothermal syntheses--collected from archived laboratory notebooks from our laboratory, and added physicochemical property descriptions to the raw notebook information using cheminformatics techniques. We used the resulting data to train a machine-learning model to predict reaction success. When carrying out hydrothermal synthesis experiments using previously untested, commercially available organic building blocks, our machine-learning model outperformed traditional human strategies, and successfully predicted conditions for new organically templated inorganic product formation with a success rate of 89 per cent. Inverting the machine-learning model reveals new hypotheses regarding the conditions for successful product formation.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27147027     DOI: 10.1038/nature17439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  15 in total

1.  Formation principles for vanadium selenites: the role of pH on product composition.

Authors:  Jacob H Olshansky; Karina J Wiener; Matthew D Smith; Anahita Nourmahnad; Max J Charles; Matthias Zeller; Joshua Schrier; Alexander J Norquist
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: history and development from the earliest days to the present time.

Authors:  Colin S Cundy; Paul A Cox
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Introduction to metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Hong-Cai Zhou; Jeffrey R Long; Omar M Yaghi
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Metal-halide perovskites for photovoltaic and light-emitting devices.

Authors:  Samuel D Stranks; Henry J Snaith
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  A new era for ab initio molecular crystal lattice energy prediction.

Authors:  Gregory J O Beran
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Crystal structure and prediction.

Authors:  Tejender S Thakur; Ritesh Dubey; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 12.703

7.  New stories of zeolite structures: their descriptions, determinations, predictions, and evaluations.

Authors:  Yi Li; Jihong Yu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Open-Framework Inorganic Materials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  From computational discovery to experimental characterization of a high hole mobility organic crystal.

Authors:  Anatoliy N Sokolov; Sule Atahan-Evrenk; Rajib Mondal; Hylke B Akkerman; Roel S Sánchez-Carrera; Sergio Granados-Focil; Joshua Schrier; Stefan C B Mannsfeld; Arjan P Zoombelt; Zhenan Bao; Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Open-source platform to benchmark fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Sereina Riniker; Gregory A Landrum
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.514

View more
  99 in total

1.  Porous materials: Designed and then realized.

Authors:  Gregory J O Beran
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  Can artificial intelligence create the next wonder material?

Authors:  Nicola Nosengo; Gerbrand Ceder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The "OK, Molly" Chemistry.

Authors:  Yi Lu
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  Artificial intelligence exploration of unstable protocells leads to predictable properties and discovery of collective behavior.

Authors:  Laurie J Points; James Ward Taylor; Jonathan Grizou; Kevin Donkers; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A unified machine-learning protocol for asymmetric catalysis as a proof of concept demonstration using asymmetric hydrogenation.

Authors:  Sukriti Singh; Monika Pareek; Avtar Changotra; Sayan Banerjee; Bangaru Bhaskararao; P Balamurugan; Raghavan B Sunoj
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  What Does the Machine Learn? Knowledge Representations of Chemical Reactivity.

Authors:  Joshua A Kammeraad; Jack Goetz; Eric A Walker; Ambuj Tewari; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Deciphering the Allosteric Process of the Phaeodactylum tricornutum Aureochrome 1a LOV Domain.

Authors:  Hao Tian; Francesco Trozzi; Brian D Zoltowski; Peng Tao
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Learning To Predict Reaction Conditions: Relationships between Solvent, Molecular Structure, and Catalyst.

Authors:  Eric Walker; Joshua Kammeraad; Jonathan Goetz; Michael T Robo; Ambuj Tewari; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 9.  Towards operando computational modeling in heterogeneous catalysis.

Authors:  Lukáš Grajciar; Christopher J Heard; Anton A Bondarenko; Mikhail V Polynski; Jittima Meeprasert; Evgeny A Pidko; Petr Nachtigall
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 54.564

10.  Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity.

Authors:  Jarosław M Granda; Liva Donina; Vincenza Dragone; De-Liang Long; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.