Literature DB >> 27146394

Comparison of Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates Among Low-Risk Women in Urban and Rural Hospitals in Hawaii.

Ann Lee Chang1, Misty Pacheco2, Kurt Yoshino3, Jill Miyamura4, Jay Maddock5.   

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine primary cesarean delivery rates among women with low risk pregnancies in urban and rural hospitals in Hawaii. Methods This is a retrospective study of all low-risk women (term, vertex, singleton) who had a primary cesarean delivery in any Hawaii hospital from 2010 to 2011 using a statewide health information database. Hospitals were divided into two categories: rural and urban. Results Of the 27,096 women who met criteria for this study, 7105 (26.2 %) delivered in a rural hospital. Low-risk women who delivered in a rural hospital had a primary cesarean delivery rate of 18.5 % compared to 11.8 % in the urban hospitals, p < .0001. Low-risk women who delivered at rural hospitals had significantly higher unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for cesarean delivery. The association with rural hospital was stronger after adjusting for confounders, aOR 2.47 (95 % CI 2.23-2.73) compared to unadjusted OR 1.70 (95 % CI 1.58-1.83) for primary cesarean delivery. Conclusions on practice In a geographically isolated population, rates of primary cesarean delivery among low-risk women are significantly higher in rural hospitals. This disparity should be investigated further.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geographic disparity; Primary cesarean section; Rural

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146394     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2012-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  8 in total

1.  Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Erin A S Clark; Robert M Silver
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data.

Authors:  Shagufta Yasmeen; Patrick S Romano; Michael E Schembri; Janet M Keyzer; William M Gilbert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Clinicians' practice environment is associated with a higher likelihood of recommending cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Jonathan M Snowden; Stephanie Handler; Ira B Tager; Alan Hubbard; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-12-02

4.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a comparison of rural and metropolitan rates in Oklahoma.

Authors:  C C Sieck
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

5.  Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; Alison G Cahill; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Michelle J K Osterman; Joyce A Martin
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2014-11-05

7.  Rural-urban differences in obstetric care, 2002-2010, and implications for the future.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Peiyin Hung; Shailendra Prasad; Michelle Casey; Ira Moscovice
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Births: final data for 2009.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Stephanie J Ventura; Michelle J K Osterman; Sharon Kirmeyer; T J Mathews; Elizabeth C Wilson
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2011-11-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.