Akihiko Okamura1, Masayuki Watanabe2, Shinji Mine1, Koujiro Nishida1, Takanori Kurogochi1, Yu Imamura1. 1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. 2. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. masayuki.watanabe@jfcr.or.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatment, postoperative pneumonia remains a major problem after esophagectomy. Lung age has been proposed as a comprehensive indicator for respiratory function. The aim of this study is to reveal the efficacy of lung age in predicting occurrence of pneumonia after esophagectomy. METHODS: We assessed 342 consecutive patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer from 2011 to 2014. Lung age was calculated from the preoperative spirometric test using the methods advocated by the Japanese Respiratory Society. We investigated factors predicting the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 28.9 %. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, grade II and grade III-V pneumonia were observed in 21.3 and 7.6 % patients, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis for the factors predicting the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia, higher lung age (p = 0.010) and lower body mass index (p = 0.006) were independent factors. Patients with grade III-V pneumonia tended to have higher lung age than those with grade II pneumonia (p = 0.084). In addition, lung age was significantly higher in patients who experienced pneumonia within postoperative days 7 than those who experienced pneumonia after postoperative days 7 (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Spirometric lung age was associated with occurrence, severity, and time of onset of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy. This simple parameter deserves a greater consideration as a predictor of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy and can support both surgeons and patients in understanding the status of respiratory function.
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatment, postoperative pneumonia remains a major problem after esophagectomy. Lung age has been proposed as a comprehensive indicator for respiratory function. The aim of this study is to reveal the efficacy of lung age in predicting occurrence of pneumonia after esophagectomy. METHODS: We assessed 342 consecutive patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer from 2011 to 2014. Lung age was calculated from the preoperative spirometric test using the methods advocated by the Japanese Respiratory Society. We investigated factors predicting the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 28.9 %. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, grade II and grade III-V pneumonia were observed in 21.3 and 7.6 % patients, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis for the factors predicting the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia, higher lung age (p = 0.010) and lower body mass index (p = 0.006) were independent factors. Patients with grade III-V pneumonia tended to have higher lung age than those with grade II pneumonia (p = 0.084). In addition, lung age was significantly higher in patients who experienced pneumonia within postoperative days 7 than those who experienced pneumonia after postoperative days 7 (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Spirometric lung age was associated with occurrence, severity, and time of onset of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy. This simple parameter deserves a greater consideration as a predictor of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy and can support both surgeons and patients in understanding the status of respiratory function.
Authors: Erik H J Hulzebos; Paul J M Helders; Nine J Favié; Rob A De Bie; Aart Brutel de la Riviere; Nico L U Van Meeteren Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Edwin J van Adrichem; Renée L Meulenbroek; John T M Plukker; Henk Groen; Ellen van Weert Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Marcovalerio Melis; Jill M Weber; James M McLoughlin; Erin M Siegel; Sarah Hoffe; Ravi Shridhar; Kiran K Turaga; George Dittrick; E Michelle Dean; Richard C Karl; Kenneth L Meredith Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: B A Grotenhuis; B P L Wijnhoven; G J Hötte; E P van der Stok; H W Tilanus; J J B van Lanschot Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Morad Chughtai; Chukwuweike U Gwam; Nequesha Mohamed; Anton Khlopas; Jared M Newman; Rafay Khan; Ali Nadhim; Shervin Shaffiy; Michael A Mont Journal: J Clin Med Res Date: 2017-04-26
Authors: Robert T van Kooten; Daan M Voeten; Ewout W Steyerberg; Henk H Hartgrink; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Michel W J M Wouters Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-09-05 Impact factor: 5.344