Literature DB >> 27144954

Geometry and expression enhance enrichment of functional yeast-displayed ligands via cell panning.

Lawrence A Stern1, Ian A Schrack1, Sadie M Johnson1, Aakash Deshpande1, Nathaniel R Bennett1, Lauren A Harasymiw2, Melissa K Gardner2, Benjamin J Hackel3.   

Abstract

Yeast surface display has proven to be an effective tool in the discovery and evolution of ligands with new or improved binding activity. Selections for binding activity are generally carried out using immobilized or fluorescently labeled soluble domains of target molecules such as recombinant ectodomain fragments. While this method typically provides ligands with high affinity and specificity for the soluble molecular target, translation to binding true membrane-bound cellular target is commonly problematic. Direct selections against mammalian cell surfaces can be carried out either exclusively or in combination with soluble target-based selections to further direct towards ligands for genuine cellular target. Using a series of fibronectin domain, affibody, and Gp2 ligands and human cell lines expressing a range of their targets, epidermal growth factor receptor and carcinoembryonic antigen, this study quantitatively identifies the elements that dictate ligand enrichment and yield. Most notably, extended flexible linkers between ligand and yeast enhance enrichment ratios from 1.4 ± 0.8 to 62 ± 57 for a low-affinity (>600 nM) binder on cells with high target expression and from 14 ± 13 to 74 ± 25 for a high-affinity binder (2 nM) on cells with medium valency. Inversion of the yeast display fusion from C-terminal display to N-terminal display still enables enrichment albeit with 40-97% reduced efficacy. Collectively, this study further enlightens the conditions-while highlighting new approaches-that yield successful enrichment of yeast-displayed binding ligands via panning on mammalian cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 2328-2341.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ligand engineering; panning; protein engineering; yeast display

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27144954      PMCID: PMC5036992          DOI: 10.1002/bit.26001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  44 in total

1.  Epidermal growth factor receptor downregulation by small heterodimeric binding proteins.

Authors:  Benjamin J Hackel; Jason R Neil; Forest M White; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 2.  Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification.

Authors:  Benjamin Leader; Quentin J Baca; David E Golan
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Picomolar affinity fibronectin domains engineered utilizing loop length diversity, recursive mutagenesis, and loop shuffling.

Authors:  Benjamin J Hackel; Atul Kapila; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Biopanning Phage-Display Libraries on Small Tissue Sections Captured by Laser Capture Microdissection.

Authors:  Yujing Sun; Girja S Shukla; Guy G Kennedy; David M Warshaw; Donald L Weaver; Stephanie C Pero; Lisa Floyd; David N Krag
Journal:  J Biotech Res       Date:  2009-01-01

Review 5.  Selection strategies for anticancer antibody discovery: searching off the beaten path.

Authors:  David Sánchez-Martín; Morten Dræby Sørensen; Simon Lykkemark; Laura Sanz; Peter Kristensen; Erkki Ruoslahti; Luis Álvarez-Vallina
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 6.  Cells and cell lysates: a direct approach for engineering antibodies against membrane proteins using yeast surface display.

Authors:  Benjamin J Tillotson; Yong Ku Cho; Eric V Shusta
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 7.  Phage peptide display.

Authors:  Jessica Newton; Susan L Deutscher
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2008

8.  Isolation of human antibodies to tumor-associated endothelial cell markers by in vitro human endothelial cell selection with phage display libraries.

Authors:  Ricardo Mutuberria; Sietske Satijn; Angelique Huijbers; Edith Van Der Linden; Hera Lichtenbeld; Patrick Chames; Jan-Willem Arends; Hennie R Hoogenboom
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Highly avid magnetic bead capture: an efficient selection method for de novo protein engineering utilizing yeast surface display.

Authors:  Margaret Ackerman; David Levary; Gabriel Tobon; Benjamin Hackel; Kelly Davis Orcutt; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2009 May-Jun

10.  Identification of an antibody fragment specific for androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Ryan M Williams; Cyrus J Hajiran; Sara Nayeem; Letha J Sooter
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.563

View more
  16 in total

1.  Cellular-Based Selections Aid Yeast-Display Discovery of Genuine Cell-Binding Ligands: Targeting Oncology Vascular Biomarker CD276.

Authors:  Lawrence A Stern; Patrick S Lown; Alexandra C Kobe; Lotfi Abou-Elkacem; Juergen K Willmann; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.784

2.  Inefficient Ribosomal Skipping Enables Simultaneous Secretion and Display of Proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Carlos A Cruz-Teran; Karthik Tiruthani; Adam Mischler; Balaji M Rao
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.110

3.  Validation and Stabilization of a Prophage Lysin of Clostridium perfringens by Using Yeast Surface Display and Coevolutionary Models.

Authors:  Seth C Ritter; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Engineered Charge Redistribution of Gp2 Proteins through Guided Diversity for Improved PET Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.

Authors:  Brett A Case; Max A Kruziki; Sadie M Johnson; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.774

5.  Titratable Avidity Reduction Enhances Affinity Discrimination in Mammalian Cellular Selections of Yeast-Displayed Ligands.

Authors:  Lawrence A Stern; Clifford M Csizmar; Daniel R Woldring; Carston R Wagner; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.784

6.  Magnetic Bead-Immobilized Mammalian Cells Are Effective Targets to Enrich Ligand-Displaying Yeast.

Authors:  Patrick S Lown; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.784

7.  Ligand Engineering via Yeast Surface Display and Adherent Cell Panning.

Authors:  Lawrence A Stern; Patrick S Lown; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

8.  CRISPR-Mediated Isogenic Cell-SELEX Approach for Generating Highly Specific Aptamers Against Native Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  Jonah C Rosch; Emma H Neal; Daniel A Balikov; Mohsin Rahim; Ethan S Lippmann
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.321

9.  Extended yeast surface display linkers enhance the enrichment of ligands in direct mammalian cell selections.

Authors:  Patrick S Lown; Jessy J Cai; Seth C Ritter; Jacob J Otolski; Ryan Wong; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.650

10.  Nature-inspired design and evolution of anti-amyloid antibodies.

Authors:  Mark C Julian; Lilia A Rabia; Alec A Desai; Ammar Arsiwala; Julia E Gerson; Henry L Paulson; Ravi S Kane; Peter M Tessier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.