Julie Anne Côté1, Julie-Anne Nazare2, Mélanie Nadeau3, Mathieu Leboeuf4, Line Blackburn4, Jean-Pierre Després3, André Tchernof1. 1. Endocrinology and nephrology, CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada; School of Nutrition, Laval University, Québec, Canada; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Canada. 2. Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Canada; Centre Européen pour la Nutrition et la Santé, Car Men laboratory, Center Hospitalier Lyon-Sud CRNH, Lyon, France. 3. Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec , Québec, Canada. 4. Gynecology Unit, CHU de Québec , Québec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of CT-derived measurements including adipose tissue attenuation and area to predict fat cell hypertrophy and related cardiometabolic risk. METHODS: Abdominal adipose tissue areas and radiologic attenuation were assessed using 4 CT images in 241 women (age: 47 years, BMI: 26.5 kg/m(2)). Fat cell weight was measured in paired VAT and SAT samples. Fasting plasma lipids, glucose and insulin levels were measured. RESULTS: Adipose tissue attenuation was negatively correlated with SAT (r=-0.46) and VAT (r=-0.67) fat cell weight in the corresponding depot (p<0.0001 for both). Women with visceral adipocyte hypertrophy had higher total-, VLDL-, LDL- and HDL-triglyceride and apoB levels as well as a higher cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio, fasting glucose and insulin levels compared to women with smaller visceral adipocytes. Adjustment for VAT area minimized these differences while subsequent adjustment for attenuation eliminated all differences, with the exception of fasting glycaemia. In SAT, adjustment for VAT area and attenuation eliminated all adipocyte hypertrophy-related alterations except for fasting hyperglycaemia. CONCLUSION: CT-derived adipose tissue attenuation and area both contribute to explain variation in the cardiometabolic risk profile associated with the same biological parameter: visceral fat cell hypertrophy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of CT-derived measurements including adipose tissue attenuation and area to predict fat cell hypertrophy and related cardiometabolic risk. METHODS: Abdominal adipose tissue areas and radiologic attenuation were assessed using 4 CT images in 241 women (age: 47 years, BMI: 26.5 kg/m(2)). Fat cell weight was measured in paired VAT and SAT samples. Fasting plasma lipids, glucose and insulin levels were measured. RESULTS: Adipose tissue attenuation was negatively correlated with SAT (r=-0.46) and VAT (r=-0.67) fat cell weight in the corresponding depot (p<0.0001 for both). Women with visceral adipocyte hypertrophy had higher total-, VLDL-, LDL- and HDL-triglyceride and apoB levels as well as a higher cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio, fasting glucose and insulin levels compared to women with smaller visceral adipocytes. Adjustment for VAT area minimized these differences while subsequent adjustment for attenuation eliminated all differences, with the exception of fasting glycaemia. In SAT, adjustment for VAT area and attenuation eliminated all adipocyte hypertrophy-related alterations except for fasting hyperglycaemia. CONCLUSION: CT-derived adipose tissue attenuation and area both contribute to explain variation in the cardiometabolic risk profile associated with the same biological parameter: visceral fat cell hypertrophy.
Authors: Klara J Rosenquist; Joseph M Massaro; Alison Pedley; Michelle T Long; Bernard E Kreger; Ramachandran S Vasan; Joanne M Murabito; Udo Hoffmann; Caroline S Fox Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Erik Arner; Pål O Westermark; Kirsty L Spalding; Tom Britton; Mikael Rydén; Jonas Frisén; Samuel Bernard; Peter Arner Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Curtis Tilves; Joseph M Zmuda; Allison L Kuipers; J Jeffrey Carr; James G Terry; Victor Wheeler; Shyamal D Peddada; Sangeeta Nair; Iva Miljkovic Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Kalypso Karastergiou; Stijn A Bos; Anu V Gerweck; Martin Torriani; Susan K Fried; Karen K Miller Journal: Growth Horm IGF Res Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Michael T Paris; Helena F Furberg; Stacey Petruzella; Oguz Akin; Andreas M Hötker; Marina Mourtzakis Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: A Michaud; J Tordjman; M Pelletier; Y Liu; S Laforest; S Noël; G Le Naour; C Bouchard; K Clément; A Tchernof Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Ye Won Jeon; Hyung Soon Park; Yousun Ko; Yu Sub Sung; Byoung Yong Shim; Young Jin Suh; Hyun A Kim Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Curtis L Gabriel; Fei Ye; Run Fan; Sangeeta Nair; James G Terry; John Jeffrey Carr; Heidi Silver; Paxton Baker; LaToya Hannah; Celestine Wanjalla; Mona Mashayekhi; Sam Bailin; Morgan Lima; Beverly Woodward; Manhal Izzy; Jane F Ferguson; John R Koethe Journal: Hepatol Commun Date: 2021-02-27