Literature DB >> 2112867

CT density of mesenteric, retroperitoneal, and subcutaneous fat in cirrhotic patients: comparison with control subjects.

R T Tyrrel1, K A Montemayor, M E Bernardino.   

Abstract

We determined the density in Hounsfield units of the mesenteric, retroperitoneal, and subcutaneous fat on CT scans made in 41 patients with biopsy-proved cirrhosis and compared the results with the density of the fat in these locations in 34 control subjects, in an attempt to quantify changes in fat density in patients with cirrhosis. The mean densities of mesenteric, retroperitoneal, and subcutaneous fat in patients with cirrhosis were -56, -107, and -111 H, respectively. The corresponding mean densities in control subjects were -107, -118, and -124 H. The mean density of mesenteric fat in patients with cirrhosis was 50% greater than that of their subcutaneous fat (p less than .0001), 48% greater than that of their retroperitoneal fat (p less than .0001), and 48% greater than that of the mesenteric fat in control subjects (p less than .0001). The mean density of subcutaneous fat in the anterior abdominal wall in patients with cirrhosis was -96 H compared with -119 H for that in their posterior abdominal wall. The corresponding mean densities in control subjects were -109 and -131 H. Density of subcutaneous fat in the anterior abdominal wall for all subjects (patients and controls) was 18% greater than that of subcutaneous fat in the posterior abdominal wall (p less than .05). In all locations, the statistical trend was for patients with cirrhosis to have higher density fat than did control subjects. These changes in density are thought to represent diffuse fat edema, most prominently in the mesentery because of portal hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2112867     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.155.1.2112867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cirrhosis-related musculoskeletal disease: radiological review.

Authors:  Ankur Arora; S Rajesh; Kalpana Bansal; Binit Sureka; Yashwant Patidar; Shalini Thapar; Amar Mukund
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Intracranial transthecal subarachnoid fat emboli and subarachnoid haemorrhage arising from a sacral fracture and dural tear.

Authors:  J K H Woo; D Malfair; T Vertinsky; M K S Heran; D Graeb
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A preoperative assessment of adjacent organ invasion by stomach carcinoma with high resolution computed tomography.

Authors:  A Tsuburaya; Y Noguchi; A Matsumoto; S Kobayashi; K Masukawa; K Horiguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Computed tomography-measured adipose tissue attenuation and area both predict adipocyte size and cardiometabolic risk in women.

Authors:  Julie Anne Côté; Julie-Anne Nazare; Mélanie Nadeau; Mathieu Leboeuf; Line Blackburn; Jean-Pierre Després; André Tchernof
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Outcome after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and correlation with nutritional status in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P Naumann; D Habermehl; T Welzel; J Debus; S E Combs
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.621

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.