Literature DB >> 2714316

Relationship between the frequency of piezoelectric shock waves and the quality of renal stone fragmentation. In vitro study and clinical implications.

G Vallancien1, R Munoz, M Borghi, B Veillon, J M Brisset, M Daudon.   

Abstract

Nine renal stones were separated into 5 fragments of similar weight and size. One fragment was analyzed chemically and the other 4 fragments were submitted to treatment by piezoelectric shock waves according to the following modalities: 3,000 shock waves at firing frequencies of 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 shock waves/s. In the case of hard stones, better quality fragmentation was obtained with low frequencies than with high frequencies. With friable stones, using only 800 shock waves, the result was the same regardless of the frequency used. Treatment of hard stones by shock waves for 20 min at various frequencies revealed that a slightly better result was obtained with a frequency of 5 shock waves/s, although the result was not significantly better. In conclusion, slow frequencies of 1.25 or 2.5 shock waves/s allow better fragmentation of hard stones at the cost of a longer mean treatment than at high frequencies. High frequencies do not give significantly better results than low frequencies when the same firing time is used. In the clinical situation, it is therefore preferable to use low frequencies which allow treatment without anesthesia or analgesia and without admission to hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2714316     DOI: 10.1159/000471527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  10 in total

1.  Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Irina V Pishchalnikova; R Jason Vonderhaar
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Removal of residual nuclei following a cavitation event using low-amplitude ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Comparison of escalating, constant, and reduction energy output in ESWL for renal stones: multi-arm prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Danny M Rabah; Mohamed S Mabrouki; Karim H Farhat; Mohamed A Seida; Mostafa A Arafa; Riyadh F Talic
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Removal of residual nuclei following a cavitation event: a parametric study.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; Charles A Cain; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  In vitro comminution of model renal calculi using histotripsy.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Adam D Maxwell; William W Roberts; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Removal of residual cavitation nuclei to enhance histotripsy erosion of model urinary stones.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Effect of firing rate on the performance of shock wave lithotriptors.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Paul D McClain; Jessica N Lange; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

10.  Does treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney or ureteral stones?

Authors:  K Muruganandham; Aneesh Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.