AIM: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and grey-to-white matter (GWR) either alone or in combination in patients treated with targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single centre study of post cardiac arrest patients treated with TTM. ONSD and GWR on brain computed tomography (CT) was measured by two emergency physicians. We analysed the prognostic performance and cut offs of GWR and ONSD, singly and in combination in predicting poor neurologic outcome (CPC 3-5). RESULTS: Of the 119 patients studied, 74 patients showed poor outcome. The combination of ONSD and GWR significantly (p=0.002) improved prognostic performance (AUROC 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58-0.76, p<0.001) in predicting poor neurologic outcomes rather than each ONSD (AUROC 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50-0.68, p=0.08) or GWR (AUROC 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56-0.74, p=0.002) alone. A combined cut off of 'GWR and ONSD (1.16 and 4.9)' and 'GWR or ONSD (1.13 or 6.5)' improved the sensitivity for predicting poor outcome while maintaining high specificity compared to GWR alone. CONCLUSION: The combination of ONSD and GWR yielded improved prognostic value for predicting poor neurologic outcomes in post cardiac arrest patients treated with TTM.
AIM: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and grey-to-white matter (GWR) either alone or in combination in patients treated with targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single centre study of post cardiac arrestpatients treated with TTM. ONSD and GWR on brain computed tomography (CT) was measured by two emergency physicians. We analysed the prognostic performance and cut offs of GWR and ONSD, singly and in combination in predicting poor neurologic outcome (CPC 3-5). RESULTS: Of the 119 patients studied, 74 patients showed poor outcome. The combination of ONSD and GWR significantly (p=0.002) improved prognostic performance (AUROC 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58-0.76, p<0.001) in predicting poor neurologic outcomes rather than each ONSD (AUROC 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50-0.68, p=0.08) or GWR (AUROC 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56-0.74, p=0.002) alone. A combined cut off of 'GWR and ONSD (1.16 and 4.9)' and 'GWR or ONSD (1.13 or 6.5)' improved the sensitivity for predicting poor outcome while maintaining high specificity compared to GWR alone. CONCLUSION: The combination of ONSD and GWR yielded improved prognostic value for predicting poor neurologic outcomes in post cardiac arrestpatients treated with TTM.
Authors: Sung Ho Kwon; Sang Hoon Oh; Jinhee Jang; Soo Hyun Kim; Kyu Nam Park; Chun Song Youn; Han Joon Kim; Jee Yong Lim; Hyo Joon Kim; Hyo Jin Bang Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-26 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Claudio Sandroni; Sonia D'Arrigo; Sofia Cacciola; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Marlijn J A Kamps; Mauro Oddo; Fabio S Taccone; Arianna Di Rocco; Frederick J A Meijer; Erik Westhall; Massimo Antonelli; Jasmeet Soar; Jerry P Nolan; Tobias Cronberg Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Wen Jie Wang; Jie Cui; Guang Wei Lv; Shun Yi Feng; Yong Zhao; Su Li Zhang; Yong Li Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Neill K J Adhikari; Damon C Scales; Carmen Lopez Soto; Laura Dragoi; Chinthaka C Heyn; Andreas Kramer; Ruxandra Pinto Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Heekyung Lee; Joonkee Lee; Hyungoo Shin; Changsun Kim; Hyuk-Joong Choi; Bo-Seung Kang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 3.390