OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated whether optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) could be used to predict neurological outcomes in post-cardiac arrest (CA) patients. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search in the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to June 2020 for eligible articles. Stata 14.0 software was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 473 patients were considered eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled result using a random-effects model showed that broadened ONSD is associated with poor neurological outcomes in post-CA patients (OR = 15.62, 95% CI: 5.50-44.34, P < 0.001; I 2 = 58.4%, P = 0.018), with a sensibility of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.45-0.73) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98). The area under the curve of the SROC curve for ONSD was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). Subgroup analysis revealed that sample size and time of ONSD measurement may be the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the stability of the results of this meta-analysis. No publication bias using Deeks' funnel plot was noted across the studies (P = 0.23). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that ONSD can be used to predict neurological outcomes in post-CA patients.
OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated whether optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) could be used to predict neurological outcomes in post-cardiac arrest (CA) patients. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search in the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to June 2020 for eligible articles. Stata 14.0 software was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 473 patients were considered eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled result using a random-effects model showed that broadened ONSD is associated with poor neurological outcomes in post-CA patients (OR = 15.62, 95% CI: 5.50-44.34, P < 0.001; I 2 = 58.4%, P = 0.018), with a sensibility of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.45-0.73) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98). The area under the curve of the SROC curve for ONSD was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). Subgroup analysis revealed that sample size and time of ONSD measurement may be the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the stability of the results of this meta-analysis. No publication bias using Deeks' funnel plot was noted across the studies (P = 0.23). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that ONSD can be used to predict neurological outcomes in post-CA patients.
Authors: Gisela Lilja; Niklas Nielsen; Hans Friberg; Janneke Horn; Jesper Kjaergaard; Fredrik Nilsson; Tommaso Pellis; Jørn Wetterslev; Matt P Wise; Frank Bosch; John Bro-Jeppesen; Iole Brunetti; Azul Forti Buratti; Christian Hassager; Caisa Hofgren; Angelo Insorsi; Michael Kuiper; Alice Martini; Nicki Palmer; Malin Rundgren; Christian Rylander; Annelou van der Veen; Michael Wanscher; Helen Watkins; Tobias Cronberg Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jin Pyeong Jeon; Si Un Lee; Sung-Eun Kim; Suk Hyung Kang; Jin Seo Yang; Hyuk Jai Choi; Yong Jun Cho; Seung Pil Ban; Hyoung Soo Byoun; Young Soo Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sung Ho Kwon; Sang Hoon Oh; Jinhee Jang; Soo Hyun Kim; Kyu Nam Park; Chun Song Youn; Han Joon Kim; Jee Yong Lim; Hyo Joon Kim; Hyo Jin Bang Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-26 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Heekyung Lee; Joonkee Lee; Hyungoo Shin; Changsun Kim; Hyuk-Joong Choi; Bo-Seung Kang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 3.390