Keeley J Pratt1,2, Elizabeth K Balk3, Megan Ferriby4, Lorraine Wallace5, Sabrena Noria6, Bradley Needleman6. 1. Department of Human Sciences, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, 135 Campbell Hall, 1787 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. pratt.192@osu.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. pratt.192@osu.edu. 3. Department of Health Promotion and Exercise Studies, Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, CT, 06810, USA. 4. Department of Human Sciences, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, 135 Campbell Hall, 1787 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. 5. Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the romantic and peer relationships of bariatric surgery candidates and associations with health behaviors. METHOD: Adults seeking bariatric surgery (N = 120) completed surveys addressing health behaviors and social relationships at information sessions. Analysis was done to compare male/female differences in peer and romantic relationships and associations with health behaviors. Previously published reference (REF) data on the Relationship Structures questionnaire was used for comparison, and to split our sample into those ≤ or > REF mean for relationship anxiety and avoidance. RESULTS: Our sample reported higher avoidance and lower anxiety in their close friendships and romantic relationships compared to the REF sample. Men in our sample had higher peer and romantic relationships avoidance compared to the REF sample and had significantly higher close friendship avoidance than women in our sample. Participants with lower anxiety in their romantic relationships (≤ REF) had higher uncontrolled eating and physical activity; those with more anxiety in their romantic relationships (> REF) had a higher BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the potential influence that social relationships may have on health behaviors within the bariatric surgery population. Further investigation is warranted to explore male bariatric surgery candidates' relationships to inform understanding and intervention development.
BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the romantic and peer relationships of bariatric surgery candidates and associations with health behaviors. METHOD: Adults seeking bariatric surgery (N = 120) completed surveys addressing health behaviors and social relationships at information sessions. Analysis was done to compare male/female differences in peer and romantic relationships and associations with health behaviors. Previously published reference (REF) data on the Relationship Structures questionnaire was used for comparison, and to split our sample into those ≤ or > REF mean for relationship anxiety and avoidance. RESULTS: Our sample reported higher avoidance and lower anxiety in their close friendships and romantic relationships compared to the REF sample. Men in our sample had higher peer and romantic relationships avoidance compared to the REF sample and had significantly higher close friendship avoidance than women in our sample. Participants with lower anxiety in their romantic relationships (≤ REF) had higher uncontrolled eating and physical activity; those with more anxiety in their romantic relationships (> REF) had a higher BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the potential influence that social relationships may have on health behaviors within the bariatric surgery population. Further investigation is warranted to explore male bariatric surgery candidates' relationships to inform understanding and intervention development.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery; Couples; Peer relationships; Romantic relationship; Support
Authors: David B Sarwer; Jacqueline C Spitzer; Thomas A Wadden; Raymond C Rosen; James E Mitchell; Kathy Lancaster; Anita Courcoulas; William Gourash; Nicholas J Christian Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Dale S Bond; Rena R Wing; Sivamainthan Vithiananthan; Harry C Sax; G Dean Roye; Beth A Ryder; Dieter Pohl; Jeannine Giovanni Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: David B Sarwer; Jacqueline C Spitzer; Thomas A Wadden; James E Mitchell; Kathryn Lancaster; Anita Courcoulas; William Gourash; Raymond C Rosen; Nicholas J Christian Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Tosca D Braun; Amy A Gorin; Rebecca M Puhl; Andrea Stone; Diane M Quinn; Jennifer Ferrand; Ana M Abrantes; Jessica Unick; Darren Tishler; Pavlos Papasavas Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: Catherine Van Fossen; Haley Kiser; Callie Lambert Brown; Joseph Skelton; Keeley Jean Pratt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Charlotte A Albright; Keeley J Pratt; Sarah B Martin; Hannah Hulshult; Callie L Brown; Kristina H Lewis; Joseph A Skelton Journal: Clin Obes Date: 2020-01-21