Literature DB >> 15262017

Cognitive eating restraint scores are associated with body fatness but not with other measures of dieting in women.

Jeannemarie M Beiseigel1, Sharon M Nickols-Richardson.   

Abstract

Nearly 50% of women report dieting to lose weight, but the ability of cognitive eating restraint (CER) scores to separate women based on indicators of restricted intake has not been adequately demonstrated. We examined the ability of the CER subscale of the eating inventory to distinguish differences in resting energy expenditure (REE), body composition, cortisol, dietary intake, and physical activity, in a group of women. Subjects (20.4+/-2.3 years) were divided into high (score>9; n=31) and low (score< or =9; n=34) CER groups based on questionnaire responses. Indirect calorimetry was used to measure REE and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition. Salivary and 24-hour urinary cortisol were measured by bioassays. Food frequency questionnaires and 4-day food records, physical activity recalls, and anthropometric measures were completed. Women in the high CER group possessed more fat mass (p<0.05) and higher body fat percent (p<0.05) and consumed more servings of fruits and vegetables per day (p<0.05) compared to women in the low CER group. Differences in other indicators were not observed between CER groups. Our findings suggest that cognitive restraint and body fatness may not be independent of one another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15262017     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2004.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  8 in total

1.  Recognizing disordered eating in primary care patients with obesity.

Authors:  Sara A Chacko; Sarah N Chiodi; Christina C Wee
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Association of cognitive restraint with ghrelin, leptin, and insulin levels in subjects who are not weight-reduced.

Authors:  Ellen A Schur; David E Cummings; Holly S Callahan; Karen E Foster-Schubert
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-11-23

3.  Bariatric Surgery Candidates' Peer and Romantic Relationships and Associations with Health Behaviors.

Authors:  Keeley J Pratt; Elizabeth K Balk; Megan Ferriby; Lorraine Wallace; Sabrena Noria; Bradley Needleman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Dietary restraint and telomere length in pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Amy Kiefer; Jue Lin; Elizabeth Blackburn; Elissa Epel
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R21: a confirmatory factor analysis in a Portuguese sample.

Authors:  Patrícia A S Duarte; Lara Palmeira; José Pinto-Gouveia
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Physical activity, eating traits and weight in young adulthood: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Authors:  R S Falck; C Drenowatz; J E Blundell; R P Shook; J R Best; G A Hand; S N Blair
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2016-12-05

7.  Three factor eating questionnaire-R18 as a measure of cognitive restraint, uncontrolled eating and emotional eating in a sample of young Finnish females.

Authors:  Susanna Anglé; Janne Engblom; Tiina Eriksson; Susanna Kautiainen; Marja-Terttu Saha; Pirjo Lindfors; Matti Lehtinen; Arja Rimpelä
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  The Relationship between Restrained Eating, Body Image, and Dietary Intake among University Students in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Cuiting Yong; Hanmei Liu; Qiping Yang; Jing Luo; Yufeng Ouyang; Minghui Sun; Yue Xi; Caihong Xiang; Qian Lin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.