Literature DB >> 27142100

Analysis of central venous pressure (CVP) signals using mathematical methods.

Parham Atefvahid1, Kamran Hassani2, Kamal Jafarian1, D John Doyle3, Hessam Ahmadi1.   

Abstract

Central venous pressure (CVP) is an important clinical parameter for physicians but only the absolute CVP value is typically monitored in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study, we propose a novel mathematical method to present and analyze CVP signals. A total of 44 suitable samples were chosen from a total of 65 collected in an ICU. Pre-processing of the samples included rate reduction and digital filtering. The statistical features of time and frequency domain, wavelet, and empirical mode decomposition of these signals were extracted. We found no significant difference among the CVP signals regarding sex, smoking, coronary disease, and respiration mode of the samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central venous pressure; Empirical mode decomposition; P value; Signal processing; Statistical analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27142100     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9882-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of peripheral and central venous pressures in critically Ill patients.

Authors:  C Charalambous; T A Barker; C S Zipitis; I Siddique; R Swindell; R Jackson; J Benson
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 2.  Preventing complications of central venous catheterization.

Authors:  David C McGee; Michael K Gould
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Noninvasive central venous pressure measurement by controlled compression sonography at the forearm.

Authors:  Christoph Thalhammer; Markus Aschwanden; Angela Odermatt; Ulrich A Baumann; Stephan Imfeld; Deniz Bilecen; Stephan C Marsch; Kurt A Jaeger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Correlation between centrally versus peripherally transduced venous pressure in prone patients undergoing posterior spine surgery.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Kethy Jules-Elysse; Federico P Girardi; Valeria Buschiazzo; Daniel Maalouf; Andrew A Sama; Michael K Urban
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Peripheral venous pressure as an alternative to central venous pressure in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  S H Kim; S Y Park; J Cui; J H Lee; S H Cho; W S Chae; H C Jin; K H Hwang
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Real-time lumped parameter modeling of cardiovascular dynamics using electrocardiogram signals: toward virtual cardiovascular instruments.

Authors:  Trung Q Le; Satish T S Bukkapatnam; Ranga Komanduri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Detection of respiration in central venous pressure using state machine.

Authors:  Douglas E Dow; Alejandra P Garcia
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

8.  Correlation of peripheral venous pressure and central venous pressure in surgical patients.

Authors:  D Amar; J A Melendez; H Zhang; C Dobres; D H Leung; R E Padilla
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 9.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.