Literature DB >> 12635392

Comparison of peripheral and central venous pressures in critically Ill patients.

C Charalambous1, T A Barker, C S Zipitis, I Siddique, R Swindell, R Jackson, J Benson.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective study to determine the relationship between central (CVP) and peripheral (PVP) venous pressures in critically ill patients. CVP and PVP were measured on five different occasions in 20 critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Results showed that the mean difference between PVP and CVP was 4.4 mmHg (95% CI = 3.7 to 5.0). However, PVP might be 1.9 mmHg below (95% CI = 0.7 to 3.1) or 10.6 mmHg above (95% CI = 9.4 to 11.8) the CVP. The mean difference between changes in PVP and corresponding changes in CVP was 0.3 mmHg (95% CI = -0.1 to 0.7). The actual change in PVP could be 3.0 mmHg below (95% CI = 2.3 to 3.7) or 3.6 mmHg above (95% CI = 2.9 to 4.3) the change in CVP. Overall, the direction of change in PVP (rise or drop) predicted a same direction of change in CVP with an accuracy of 78%. Changes in PVP > or = 2 mmHg predicted a change in same direction of CVP with an accuracy of 90%. The direction of changes in CVP > or = 2 mmHg were predicted by the direction of change in PVP with an accuracy of 91%. We conclude that PVP measurement does not give an accurate estimate of the absolute value of CVP in individual patients. However, as changes in PVP parallel, in direction, changes in CVP, serial measurements of PVP may have a value in determining volume status and guiding fluid therapy in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12635392     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0303100106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of central venous pressure (CVP) signals using mathematical methods.

Authors:  Parham Atefvahid; Kamran Hassani; Kamal Jafarian; D John Doyle; Hessam Ahmadi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A Novel Non-Invasive Device for the Assessment of Central Venous Pressure in Hospital, Office and Home.

Authors:  Emanuela Marcelli; Laura Cercenelli; Barbara Bortolani; Saverio Marini; Luca Arfilli; Alessandro Capucci; Gianni Plicchi
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  Comparison of the central venous pressure from internal jugular vein and the pressure measured from the peripherally inserted antecubital central catheter (PICCP) in liver transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Jung-Yeon Yun; So-Hee Park; Dae-Soon Cho; Hae-Jeung Jeung; Soon-Ae Lee; So Jin Seo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-10-22

4.  Peripheral venous pressure as a reliable predictor for monitoring central venous pressure in patients with burns.

Authors:  Lulu Sherif; Vikas S Joshi; Anjali Ollapally; Prithi Jain; Kishan Shetty; Karl Sa Ribeiro
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-04

5.  Comparison between noninvasive measurement of central venous pressure using near infrared spectroscopy with an invasive central venous pressure monitoring in cardiac surgical Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  N Sathish; Naveen G Singh; P S Nagaraja; B M Sarala; C G Prabhushankar; Manasa Dhananjaya; N Manjunatha
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  Correlation between central venous pressure and peripheral venous pressure with passive leg raise in patients on mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Syed Moied Ahmed; Shahna Ali; Utpal Ray; Ankur Varshney; Kashmiri Doley
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.