| Literature DB >> 27141535 |
Shiva Shahsavari1, Zahra Noormohammadi1, Shohreh Zare Karizi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recurrent spontaneous abortion is one of the diseases that can lead to physical, psychological, and, economical problems for both individuals and society. Recently a few numbers of genetic polymorphisms in kinase insert domain-containing receptor (KDR) gene are examined that can endanger the life of the fetus in pregnant women.Entities:
Keywords: Abortion; Genetic structures; Polymorphism; Restriction fragment length polymorphism; VEGF receptor 2
Year: 2015 PMID: 27141535 PMCID: PMC4827512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) ISSN: 2476-3772
Primer sequences designed for three SNPs of KDR gene with their PCR length, annealing temperature (Ta), restriction enzymes and, restriction digestion band size for each genotype. AluI and MnlI enzymes digested two sites of PCR products. (Underlined numbers show restriction bands belong to rs1870377 and rs6838752 sites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1719A→T (rs1870377,exon 7) | F-TGCAAGTCCTCCACACTTCTCCAT | 382 | 63 | AluI | AA:104, 278 |
| 32662 C→T (rs6838752, intron) | F- GAGTCAACAACAACAGCAACAAG | 300 | 60 | MnlI | CC: 41, 84,175 |
| 1192C→T (rs2305948, exon 11) | F-ATCCTTGGTCACTCCGGGGTA | 151 | 58 | RsaI | CC: 19, 132 |
PCR: polymerase chain reaction
Figure 1PCR products of SNP rs1870377 region (382 bp) on 1.2% agaros gel (A) and, restriction fragments produced by AluI digestion (B) on 10% PAGE. The 100 bp DNA ladder was used. Bands less than 60 bps are not visualized on gel electrophoresis.
Figure 2PCR products of SNP rs6838752 region (300bp) on 1.2% agaros gel (A) and, restriction fragments produced by AluI digestion (B) on 10% PAGE. The 100 bp DNA ladder was used. Bands less than 60 bps are not visualized on gel electrophoresis
Figure 3PCR products of SNP rs2305948 region (151 bp) on 1.2% agaros gel (A) and, restriction fragments produced by AluI digestion (B) on 10% PAGE. The 100 bp DNA ladder was used. Bands less than 60 bps are not visualized on gel electrophoresis
Allele and genotype frequencies in the case and control samples in three SNPs studied
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| T | 340 | 0.85 | 175 | 0.88 | 165 | 0.82 | 3.249 (0.08) |
| A | 60 | 0.15 | 25 | 0.12 | 35 | 0.18 | |
| TA | 60 | 0.3 | 25 | 0.25 | 35 | 0.35 | |
| TT | 140 | 0.7 | 75 | 0.75 | 65 | 0.65 | |
|
| |||||||
| T | 337 | 0.84 | 169 | 0.84 | 168 | 0.84 | 0.230 (0.43) |
| C** | 63 | 0.16 | 31 | 0.16 | 32 | 0.16 | |
| TC | 63 | 0.32 | 31 | 0.31 | 32 | 0.32 | |
| TT | 137 | 0.68 | 69 | 0.69 | 68 | 0.68 | |
|
| |||||||
| T | 262 | 0.66 | 127 | 0.64 | 135 | 0.68 | 0.705 (0.35) |
| C | 138 | 0.34 | 73 | 0.36 | 65 | 0.32 | |
| CC | 47 | 0.24 | 26 | 0.26 | 21 | 0.21 | |
| TC | 44 | 0.22 | 21 | 0.21 | 23 | 0.23 | |
| TT | 109 | 0.55 | 53 | 0.53 | 56 | 0.56 | |
Chi square (X2) calculated based on 2× 2 Contingency Table using SNPstats software.
Minimum allele frequency (MAF allele).
Inheritance models of SNPs and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidential interval between case and controls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
| TT | 75 (75%) | 65 (65%) | 1 | 0.12 | 278.9 | 285.5 |
| AT | 25 (25%) | 35 (35%) | 1.62 (0.88-2.98) | ||||
|
| |||||||
|
| TT | 69 (69%) | 68 (68%) | 1 | 0.88 | 281.2 | 287.8 |
| CT | 31 (31%) | 32 (32%) | 1.05 (0.58-1.90) | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Codominant | TT | 53 (53%) | 56 (56%) | 1 | 0.7 | 282.6 | 292.4 |
| CT | 21 (21%) | 23 (23%) | 1.04 (0.51-2.09) | ||||
| CC | 26 (26%) | 21 (21%) | 0.76 (0.38-1.52) | ||||
| Dominant | TT | 53 (53%) | 56 (56%) | 1 | 0.67 | 281.1 | 287.7 |
| CT-CC | 47 (47%) | 44 (44%) | 0.89 (0.51-1.55) | ||||
| Recessive | TT-CT | 74 (74%) | 79 (79%) | 1 | 0.4 | 280.6 | 287.2 |
| CC | 26 (26%) | 21 (21%) | 0.76 (0.39-1.46) | ||||
| Overdominant | TT-CC | 79 (79%) | 77 (77%) | 1 | 0.73 | 281.1 | 287.7 |
| CT | 21 (21%) | 23 (23%) | 1.12 (0.58-2.20) | ||||
| Log-additive | --- | --- | --- | 0.89 (0.64-1.24) | 0.49 | 280.8 | 287.4 |
Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as a calculating the association between genotypes and recurrent spontaneous abortion using logistic regression analysis. Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were calculated for the selection of the best model for a specific SNP.
linkage disequilibrium analysis between pair SNPs studied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1870378 | rs6838752 | 400 | 0.027 | 0.214 | 0.086-0.343 | 0.043 | 16.446 | 1 | 0.000 | 11.876 |
| rs1870378 | rs2305948 | 400 | 0.000 | 0.050 | -0.122-0.222 | 0.000 | 0.459 | 1 | 0.498 | -0.547 |
| rs6838752 | rs2305948 | 400 | 0.000 | -0.151 | -0.452-0.149 | 0.002 | 1.163 | 1 | 0.280 | -0.807 |
linkage disequilibrium (LD) of SNPs was calculated based on D, D´, Pearson’s r and Chi square values calculated based on 2 x 2 Contingency Table between each pair of SNPs by SNPAlyze 7.0. Pro software. Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) is inheritance model was calculated for the selection of the best model for a specific SNP
Haplotype patterns with their frequencies in case and control groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-T-T | 0.4767 | 0.4909 | 0.4658 | 0.4767 | 1 | --- |
| T-T-C | 0.2664 | 0.2852 | 0.2425 | 0.7431 | 0.97 (0.62 - 1.52) | 0.89 |
| T-C-T | 0.0841 | 0.0771 | 0.0917 | 0.8272 | 1.32 (0.53 - 3.28) | 0.55 |
| A-T-T | 0.0664 | 0.0469 | 0.0865 | 0.8936 | 2.17 (0.76 - 6.16) | 0.15 |
| A-T-C | 0.0331 | 0.022 | 0.0452 | 0.9266 | 2.42 (0.58 - 10.03) | 0.23 |
| A-C-T | 0.0278 | 0.0202 | 0.0309 | 0.9544 | 1.90 (0.34 - 10.55) | 0.47 |
| A-C-C | 0.0228 | 0.036 | 0.0124 | 0.9772 | 0.44 (0.08 - 2.59) | 0.37 |
| T-C-C | 0.0228 | 0.0218 | 0.025 | 1 | 1.21 (0.22 - 6.68) | 0.83 |
Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confident interval calculated by logistic regression.
Global haplotype association p-value: 0.49.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) test between case and control groups based on three SNP data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among group | 1 | 1.200 | 1.200 | 0.000 | 0 |
| Within group | 198 | 288.320 | 1.456 | 1.456 | 100 |
| Total | 199 | 289.520 | 1.456 | 100 | |
| Stat | Value | P(rand >= data) | |||
| PhiPT | -0.002 | 0.487 |
AMOVA test used to estimate population differentiation directly from molecular data and testing hypotheses about such differentiation based on squared Euclidean distance
Figure 4Neighbor Joining analysis based on three SNPs studied for case and control samples. 1 to 100= patient individuals; 101 to 200= control individuals. bootstrapping numbers on branches
Figure 5STRUCTURE plot based on three KDR SNP sites. Different alleles show in different colors. 1 to 100= patient individuals; 101 to 200= control individuals
Clustering statistics from k=1 to k=8 based on SNPs data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 289.52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.002 | 1138.943 |
| 2 | 289.52 | 88.92 | 201 | 0.307 | 87.767 | 4.66 | 1070.859 |
| 3 | 289.52 | 141.8 | 148 | 0.49 | 94.568 | -54.493 | 1014.943 |
| 4 | 289.52 | 180.6 | 109 | 0.624 | 108.35 | -113.355 | 959.297 |
| 5 | 289.52 | 210.2 | 79.4 | 0.726 | 129.11 | -174.571 | 901.275 |
| 6 | 289.52 | 232.8 | 56.7 | 0.804 | 159.27 | -239.618 | 839.4 |
| 7 | 289.52 | 246.2 | 43.3 | 0.85 | 182.88 | -291.42 | 790.748 |
| 8& | 289.52 | 259 | 30.5 | 0.895 | 232.64 | -359.139 | 726.157 |
SSD(T)= sum of square distance (total)
SSDAP/WG= sum of square distance (among-populations-within-groups)
Pseudo-F= it relates r-squared, the fraction of total variance that is explained by the clustering, to the number of clusters k and the number of populations
Best clustering according to Calinski & Harabasz' pseudo-F: k = 8; & Best clustering according to Bayesian Information Criterion: k = 8 Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)