Literature DB >> 27141181

Saudi Oncology Society and Saudi Urology Association combined clinical management guidelines for testicular germ cell tumors.

Mohammed Alotaibi1, Ahmad Saadeddin2, Shouki Bazarbashi3, Sultan Alkhateeb4, Abdullah Alghamdi5, Khalid Alghamdi6, Esam Murshid7, Ashraf Abusamra8, Danny Rabah9, Imran Ahmad10, Mubarak Al-Mansour11, Abdullah Alsharm12.   

Abstract

This is an update to the previously published Saudi guidelines for the evaluation, medical, and surgical management of patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors. It is categorized according to the stage of the disease using the tumor-node-metastasis staging system 7(th) edition. The guidelines are presented with supporting evidence level, they are based on comprehensive literature review, several internationally recognized guidelines, and the collective expertise of the guidelines committee members (authors) who were selected by the Saudi Oncology Society and Saudi Urological Association. Considerations to the local availability of drugs, technology and expertise have been regarded. These guidelines should serve as a roadmap for the urologists, oncologists, general physicians, support groups, and health care policy makers in the management of patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Saudi Oncology Society; Saudi Urological Association; germ cell; guidelines; management; testicular; tumor

Year:  2016        PMID: 27141181      PMCID: PMC4839228          DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.179240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Ann        ISSN: 0974-7796


INTRODUCTION

Testicular cancer is a rare disease. A total of 78 cases have been diagnosed in 2010, with an age standardized rate of 0.8 cases/100,000 representing 1.7% of all diagnosed cancer in Saudi males (www.scr.org.sa). Owing to the rarity of the disease and the multidisciplinary approach in managing testis cancer, the group recommended that all testicular cancer cases should be managed in tertiary care centers. Staging The American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging for testis cancer (7th edition 2010) was used.[1] Evaluation of testicular tumors Ultrasound of the scrotum is recommended to diagnose the tumor Serum tumor markers includes alpha fetoprotein (AFP), beta human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), and lactate dehydrogenase should prior to orchiectomy Computed tomography (CT) chest, abdomen, and pelvis should performed for confirmed testicular cancer. Risk stratification The International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group risk classification. Treatment of testicular germ cell cancer General considerations: Patients at all stages should undergo urgent inguinal orchiectomy unless the clinical situation requires immediate chemotherapy in patients with a testicular mass and clear germ cell malignancy based on elevated tumor markers Trans-scrotal biopsy or orchiectomy for any intra-testicular lesion is absolutely contra-indicated All patients who will undergo treatment with chemotherapy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), or radiotherapy should be offered sperm banking. To maintain treatment intensity, chemotherapy cycles should be repeated every 3 weeks, independent of leukocyte count Tumor markers are to be determined immediately before the start of each new chemotherapy cycle. The treatment will depend on the histological subtype as follow: Seminoma Further treatment will depend on the stage: Stage I Surveillance: Is considered the preferred strategy, except in patients with expected poor compliance or with primary tumor size ≥4 cm and ≥pT2 (evidence level [EL-1])[2] Chemotherapy: Single agent carboplatin: 1–2 doses at area under the curve 7 (EL-1)[3] Radiotherapy: Infradiaphragmatic para-aortic strip only and in patient with prior scrotal surgery, ipsilateral iliac nodes should be included (EL-1).[45] Stage IS Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy to para-aortic strip only and in patient with prior scrotal surgery, ipsilateral iliac nodes should be included (EL-3).[6] Stage IIA and IIB, all of the following options are acceptable Radiotherapy to infradiaphragmatic para-aortic and ipsilateral Iliac nodes, preferred for stage IIA and for stage IIB who are not fit for chemotherapy (EL-2)[7] Three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy or four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EP), if there are concerns about bleomycin toxicity as in patients with reduction in lung capacity, emphysema, heavy smoking (including former smokers) (EL-2). Stage IIC and III: Treatment will depend on the risk classification Good risk: Three cycles of BEP chemotherapy or four cycles of EP, if there are concerns about bleomycin lung toxicity (EL-1)[8] Intermediate risk: Chemotherapy with four cycles of BEP or four cycles of VIP chemotherapy (etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) (EL-1).[9] Management of postchemotherapy residual nodes/masses seen on computed tomography scan: This depend on the size and the level of tumor markers (hCG): If size <3 cm and normal markers: Surveillance If more than 3 cm and normal markers: Do positron emission tomography:[10] If negative: Surveillance (EL-2). If positive consider one of the following options: Surgical resection Second-line chemotherapy if positive for residual disease (see item 4.2.1.6.3.2) Radiotherapy If the residual mass is enlarging or markers increasing: Second-line chemotherapy (EL-2) - (see item 4.2.1.6.3.2). Management of patients failing 1st line chemotherapy: Patients will receive second-line chemotherapy; options are: Four cycles of vinblastine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VeIP) regimen[11] (EL-2) or Four cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) regimen (EL-2).[12] Management of patients failing second-line chemotherapy: Patients will be treated with monotherapy or combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine (for those who did not receive paclitaxel before), gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, or oral etoposide.[13] Nonseminoma Treatment will depend on the stage as follow: Stage I Treatment will depend on the presence of any the following risk factors: Lymphovascular invasion, presence of embryonal histology (50% or more), absence of yolk sac histology, and tumor stage > T1.[1415] Stage I with no risk factors, options are: Surveillance: Should be reserved in compliant patients (EL-2).[1617] Two cycles of BEP regimen (EL-1),[161718] also one cycle of BEP chemotherapy can be considered in such cases[18] Open nerve sparing RPLND to be done only in high volume tertiary care centers (EL-2),[18] further therapy will depend on the pathological result as follow: pN0: Surveillance pN1: Surveillance in compliant patients or two cycles of chemotherapy with BEP in noncompliant patients (EL-3) pN2-3: Three cycles of chemotherapy with BEP regimen (EL-3). Stage I with any risk factor of above, options are: Two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with BEPm regimen[16] Open nerve sparing RPLND: To be done only in case of contraindication for chemotherapy and in high volume tertiary care centers (EL-2):[19] Further therapy will depend on the pathological stage as in item 4.2.1.1.3.1-3. Stage IS: Patient should receive three cycles of systemic chemotherapy with the BEP regimen (EL-3). Stage IIA and IIB: Options of therapy will depend if markers (AFP and hCG) are normal or elevated: Normal markers, options are: Primary chemotherapy with three cycles of BEP.[8] Open nerve sparing RPLND,[2021] only if the nodal metastases is in the primary landing zone and in selected patients, it should be done only in high volume center by experienced uro-oncologist. Further therapy will depend on the pathological stage as in item 4.2.1.1.3.1-3. Elevated markers: Systemic chemotherapy depending on the international risk classification group: Low risk: Three cycles of BEP chemotherapy.[78] Intermediate and high risk: Four cycles of BEP chemotherapy.[9] Stage IIC and III: Treatment will be with chemotherapy depending on the international risk classification Low risk: Three cycles of BEP chemotherapy.[78] Intermediate and high risk: Four cycles of BEP chemotherapy.[9] Management of postchemotherapy: Tumor markers and imaging with CT scan should be done 4–8 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy. No residual disease and normal markers: Surveillance is recommended.[22] No residual disease and elevated markers: Second-line chemotherapy. See item 4.2.1.6.3.2 Residual disease by CT scan (>1 cm): This depends on the level of serum markers: Normal markers: RPLND and resection of all residual disease, if technically feasible:[2324] Further therapy will depend on pathology result: Mature teratoma, necrosis, or fibrosis: No further therapy Residual germ cell tumor: Two cycles of chemo therapy[25] with E P, VIP or TIP (see below) (EL-2). Elevated markers: Second-line chemotherapy options include Four cycles of VeIP regimen.[11] Four cycles of TIP regimen.[12] High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplant.[26] Salvage treatment for seminoma and nonseminoma Conclusive recommendations cannot be made at present Prognosis is variable with 2 years survival rate ranging between 75% and 6% based on prognostic score Options includes TIP × 4 or VeIP × 4 or high-dose chemotherapy with TI-CE mainly for patients at second-line setting Carboplatin based high-dose chemotherapy as third line or later is an option, despite absence of randomized trials in this area Desperation surgery should be part of the strategy whenever possible, particularly in patients with localized disease and with poor response to chemotherapy.[27]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  26 in total

1.  Viable malignant cells after primary chemotherapy for disseminated nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: prognostic factors and role of postsurgery chemotherapy--results from an international study group.

Authors:  K Fizazi; S Tjulandin; R Salvioni; J R Germà-Lluch; J Bouzy; D Ragan; C Bokemeyer; A Gerl; A Fléchon; J S de Bono; S Stenning; A Horwich; J Pont; P Albers; U De Giorgi; M Bower; A Bulanov; G Pizzocaro; J Aparicio; C R Nichols; C Théodore; J T Hartmann; H J Schmoll; S B Kaye; S Culine; J P Droz; C Mahé
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Results and outcome of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I embryonal carcinoma--predominant testis cancer.

Authors:  C J Sweeney; B P Hermans; D K Heilman; R S Foster; J P Donohue; L H Einhorn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Radiotherapy in stage IIA and IIB testicular seminoma with reduced portals: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  H Schmidberger; M Bamberg; C Meisner; J Classen; C Winkler; M Hartmann; R Templin; T Wiegel; W Dornoff; D Ross; H J Thiel; C Martini; W Haase
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy in the salvage treatment of patients failing first-line platinum chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumours.

Authors:  J-L Pico; G Rosti; A Kramar; H Wandt; V Koza; R Salvioni; C Theodore; G Lelli; W Siegert; A Horwich; M Marangolo; W Linkesch; G Pizzocaro; H-J Schmoll; J Bouzy; J-P Droz; P Biron
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Comparison of two standard chemotherapy regimens for good-prognosis germ-cell tumours: a randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Germ Cell Trial Group.

Authors:  G C Toner; M R Stockler; M J Boyer; M Jones; D B Thomson; V J Harvey; I N Olver; H Dhillon; A McMullen; V J Gebski; J A Levi; R J Simes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prognostic risk factors that identify patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at low risk and high risk for metastasis.

Authors:  A Heidenreich; I A Sesterhenn; F K Mostofi; J W Moul
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Clinical stage I testis cancer: long-term outcome of patients on surveillance.

Authors:  P C Sogani; M Perrotti; H W Herr; W R Fair; H T Thaler; G Bosl
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell cancer: ifosfamide and cisplatin plus either vinblastine or etoposide.

Authors:  P J Loehrer; R Lauer; B J Roth; S D Williams; L A Kalasinski; L H Einhorn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Randomized phase III trial comparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with one course of bleomycin and etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of clinical stage I Nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: AUO trial AH 01/94 by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Peter Albers; Roswitha Siener; Susanne Krege; Hans-Uwe Schmelz; Klaus-Peter Dieckmann; Axel Heidenreich; Peter Kwasny; Maik Pechoel; Jan Lehmann; Sabine Kliesch; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; Rolf Fimmers; Lothar Weissbach; Volker Loy; Christian Wittekind; Michael Hartmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Saja H Almazrou; Layan A Alsubki; Norah A Alsaigh; Wadha H Aldhubaib; Sharifah M Ghazwani
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 2.  Pediatric testicular cancer: Two decades of Saudi national data.

Authors:  Mohammed Abomelha
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  Adult testicular cancer: Two decades of Saudi national data.

Authors:  Mohammed Abomelha
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.