Literature DB >> 9731905

Prognostic risk factors that identify patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at low risk and high risk for metastasis.

A Heidenreich1, I A Sesterhenn, F K Mostofi, J W Moul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable model to identify clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) associated with low risk or high risk for occult retroperitoneal metastasis, so that the model could be used to customize the therapeutic approach for patients with these tumors. The model was to be based on pathohistologic parameters and immunohistochemical expression of proliferation markers, proteases, and adhesion molecules in the primary tumor.
METHODS: One hundred forty-nine patients with clinical Stage I NSGCTs underwent retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and were included in the study. Three to five paraffin embedded, formalin fixed tissue blocks were available from each patient and were analyzed for the following histopathologic features associated with pathologic Stage I or II disease: the presence or absence of vascular invasion (VI), the presence or absence of tunic invasion, and the percentage of each histologic type present in the primary tumor. Immunohistochemical expression of MIB-1, p53, bcl-2, cathepsin D, and E-cadherin was evaluated using a semiquantitative scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The percentage of embryonal carcinoma (%EC, P < 0.001) and the presence of VI (P < 0.0001) and tunic invasion (P < 0.002) were the most significant independent risk factors associated with pathologic Stage II disease. A combination of %EC and VI allowed correct prediction of final pathologic stage for 88% of clinical Stage I patients. Cutoff values including both variables identified the correct pathologic stage for 131 of 149 patients (88%). Less than 45% EC and the absence of VI correctly identified pathologic Stage I disease in 91.5% of patients; more than 80% EC and the presence of VI correctly predicted pathologic Stage II in 88%. In univariate analysis, only p53 (P < 0.03) and E-cadherin (P < 0.001) expression were significantly different in the embryonal carcinoma component of pathologic Stage I and II NSGCT. To evaluate prospectively the clinical utility of the new derived cutoff points, the data were applied to 10 consecutive patients with clinical Stage I NSGCT who underwent retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy; pathologic Stage I and II were correctly predicted for 5 of 6 Stage I and 4 of 4 Stage II patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: %EC and the presence or absence of VI appear to be reliable prognosticators to identify patients at high risk and low risk for occult retroperitoneal disease. In cases of clinical Stage I NSGCT, p53, bcl-2, MIB-1, cathepsin D, and E-cadherin did not appear to be of prognostic significance. The authors recommend that all patients with clinical Stage I NSGCT have their primary orchiectomy specimens evaluated for %EC and the presence of VI to determine their risk for occult retroperitoneal metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9731905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  38 in total

Review 1.  Microinvasive germ cell tumor of the testis.

Authors:  Finn Edler von Eyben; Grete Krag Jacobsen; Rolf Inge Skotheim
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  High-risk clinical stage I NSGCT: the case for RPLND.

Authors:  Christopher Morash; Ilias Cagiannos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Controversies in the management of early-stage germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Ann Tan; Timothy Gilligan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Current Concepts in Management of Stage I NSGCT.

Authors:  Puneet Ahluwalia; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-17

Review 5.  [Importance of pathology for therapy planning of testicular germ cell tumors].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; R Knüchel-Clarke; D Pfister
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 6.  [Non-seminomatous germ cell tumours].

Authors:  F Bremmer; C L Behnes; S Schweyer
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  Management of patients with low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Joel Sheinfeld
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-09

Review 8.  [When is surgical resection of metastases in testicular germ cell tumors indicated and is there a scientific basis?]

Authors:  A Heidenreich; P Paffenholz; F Haidl; D Pfister
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  High risk NSGCT: case for surveillance.

Authors:  David Michael Kakiashvili; Alvaro Zuniga; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Risk-adapted management for patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumour of the testis.

Authors:  Soner Guney; Nese Guney; Nurettin Cem Sonmez; Erbil Ergenekon
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.