Literature DB >> 11352956

Viable malignant cells after primary chemotherapy for disseminated nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: prognostic factors and role of postsurgery chemotherapy--results from an international study group.

K Fizazi1, S Tjulandin, R Salvioni, J R Germà-Lluch, J Bouzy, D Ragan, C Bokemeyer, A Gerl, A Fléchon, J S de Bono, S Stenning, A Horwich, J Pont, P Albers, U De Giorgi, M Bower, A Bulanov, G Pizzocaro, J Aparicio, C R Nichols, C Théodore, J T Hartmann, H J Schmoll, S B Kaye, S Culine, J P Droz, C Mahé.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the value of postsurgery chemotherapy in patients with disseminated nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCTs) and viable residual disease after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The outcome of 238 patients was reviewed. Tumor markers had normalized in all patients before resection. A multivariate analysis of survival was performed on 146 patients.
RESULTS: The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 64% and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 73%. Three factors were independently associated with both PFS and OS: complete resection (P <.001), < 10% of viable malignant cells (P =.001), and a good International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) group (P =.01). Patients were assigned to one of three risk groups: those with no risk factors (favorable group), those with one risk factor (intermediate group), and those with two or three risk factors (poor-risk group). The 5-year OS rate was 100%, 83%, and 51%, respectively (P <.001). The 5-year PFS rate was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 76%) and 52% (95% CI, 40% to 64%) in postoperative chemotherapy recipients and nonrecipients, respectively (P <.001). No significant difference was detected in 5-year OS rates. After adjustment on the three prognostic factors, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with a significantly better PFS (P <.001) but not with better OS. Patients in the favorable risk group had a 100% 5-year OS, with or without postoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy appeared beneficial in both PFS (P <.001) and OS (P =.02) in the intermediate-risk group but was not statistically beneficial in the poor-risk group.
CONCLUSION: A complete resection may be more critical than recourse to postoperative chemotherapy in the setting of postchemotherapy viable malignant NSGCT. Immediate postoperative chemotherapy or surveillance alone with chemotherapy at relapse may be reasonable options depending on the completeness of resection, IGCCC group, and percent of viable cells. Validation is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11352956     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  44 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Kopp; Markus Kuczyk; Johannes Classen; Arnulf Stenzl; Lothar Kanz; Frank Mayer; Michael Bamberg; Jörg Thomas Hartmann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Canadian consensus guidelines for the management of testicular germ cell cancer.

Authors:  Lori Wood; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael Jewett; Peter Chung; Sebastian Hotte; Martin O'Malley; Joan Sweet; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Eric Winquist; Scott North; Scott Tyldesley; Jeremy Sturgeon; Mary Gospodarowicz; Roanne Segal; Tina Cheng; Peter Venner; Malcolm Moore; Peter Albers; Robert Huddart; Craig Nichols; Padraig Warde
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Late relapse of testis cancer.

Authors:  Yaron Ehrlich; Eli Rosenbaum; Jack Baniel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  ZBTB16: a novel sensitive and specific biomarker for yolk sac tumor.

Authors:  Guang-Qian Xiao; Faqian Li; Pamela D Unger; Hani Katerji; Qi Yang; Loralee McMahon; David E Burstein
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 5.  [Interdisciplinary cooperation in the treatment of complex patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumor].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; S Krege; M Flasshove
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Positron emission tomography (PET) is not indicated in the postchemotherapy evaluation of advanced non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  J Aparicio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  [Importance of pathology for therapy planning of testicular germ cell tumors].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; R Knüchel-Clarke; D Pfister
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Practice Patterns and Impact of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection on Testicular Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Solomon L Woldu; Joseph A Moore; Bo Ci; Yuval Freifeld; Timothy N Clinton; Ahmet M Aydin; Nirmish Singla; Krabbe Laura-Maria; Ryan C Hutchinson; James F Amatruda; Arthur Sagalowsky; Yair Lotan; Yull Arriaga; Vitaly Margulis; Yang Xie; Aditya Bagrodia
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06

9.  Management of poor-prognosis testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Kiranpreet Khurana; Timothy D Gilligan; Andrew J Stephenson
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

10.  Clinical and genetic aspects of testicular germ cell tumours.

Authors:  Martijn F Lutke Holzik; Rolf H Sijmons; Josette Ehm Hoekstra-Weebers; Dirk T Sleijfer; Harald J Hoekstra
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.