Beatriz de Lucena Villa-Chan Cantalupo1, Aline Carvalho da Silva Xavier2, Clemanzy Mariano Leandro da Silva3, Marcos Ely Almeida Andrade4, Vinícius Saito Monteiro de Barros5, Helen Jamil Khoury6. 1. MSc, Dentist, Doctoral Student in Applied Health Sciences in the Keizo Asami Laboratory of Immunopathology at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil. 2. MSc, Biomedical Engineer, Doctoral Student in Engineering Sciences at the Santiago Center, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 3. PhD, Biomedical Physician, Full Professor at the Faculdade Integrada de Pernambuco (Facipe), Recife, PE, Brazil. 4. Radiology Technologist, Laboratory Technician in the Ionizing Radiation Metrology Laboratory, Department of Nuclear Energy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil. 5. PhD, Physicist, Adjunct Professor in the Department of Nuclear Energy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil. 6. PhD, Physicist, Full Professor in the Department of Nuclear Energy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the entrance surface air kerma (Ka,e) and air kerma in the region of radiosensitive organs in radiographs of pediatric paranasal sinuses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient data and irradiation parameters were collected in examinations of the paranasal sinuses in children from 0 to 15 years of age at two children's hospitals in the city of Recife, PE, Brazil. We estimated the Ka,e using the X-ray tube outputs and selected parameters. To estimate the air kerma values in the regions of the eyes and thyroid, we used thermoluminescent dosimeters. RESULTS: The Ka,e values ranged from 0.065 to 1.446 mGy in cavum radiographs, from 0.104 to 7.298 mGy in Caldwell views, and from 0.113 to 7.824 mGy in Waters views. Air kerma values in the region of the eyes ranged from 0.001 to 0.968 mGy in cavum radiographs and from 0.011 to 0.422 mGy in Caldwell and Waters views . In the thyroid region, air kerma values ranged from 0.005 to 0.932 mGy in cavum radiographs and from 0.002 to 0.972 mGy in Caldwell and Waters views. CONCLUSION: The radiation levels used at the institutions under study were higher than those recommended in international protocols. We recommend that interventions be initiated in order to reduce patient exposure to radiation and therefore the risks associated with radiological examination of the paranasal sinuses.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the entrance surface air kerma (Ka,e) and air kerma in the region of radiosensitive organs in radiographs of pediatric paranasal sinuses. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patient data and irradiation parameters were collected in examinations of the paranasal sinuses in children from 0 to 15 years of age at two children's hospitals in the city of Recife, PE, Brazil. We estimated the Ka,e using the X-ray tube outputs and selected parameters. To estimate the air kerma values in the regions of the eyes and thyroid, we used thermoluminescent dosimeters. RESULTS: The Ka,e values ranged from 0.065 to 1.446 mGy in cavum radiographs, from 0.104 to 7.298 mGy in Caldwell views, and from 0.113 to 7.824 mGy in Waters views. Air kerma values in the region of the eyes ranged from 0.001 to 0.968 mGy in cavum radiographs and from 0.011 to 0.422 mGy in Caldwell and Waters views . In the thyroid region, air kerma values ranged from 0.005 to 0.932 mGy in cavum radiographs and from 0.002 to 0.972 mGy in Caldwell and Waters views. CONCLUSION: The radiation levels used at the institutions under study were higher than those recommended in international protocols. We recommend that interventions be initiated in order to reduce patient exposure to radiation and therefore the risks associated with radiological examination of the paranasal sinuses.
In radiological examinations of the face, radiosensitive anatomical structures, such
as the eyes and thyroid, are exposed to ionizing radiation, representing a risk to
the patient, due to the possibility of producing biological effects induced by the
interaction of the radiation with the tissue. Special attention should be given to
radiological examinations performed in pediatric patients, because, in comparison
with those of adults, their cells are more radiosensitive and have a longer life
expectancy, which increases the risk of stochastic effects(.Clinical requests for X-ray examinations of the sinuses are quite common in
children(, in order to investigate diseases of the upper
respiratory tract, such as hypertrophy of the adenoids, inflammatory diseases of the
sinus cavities, sinus infections, tumors, and facial fractures(. Conventional radiography for the radiological study of the
sinuses can be performed as follows(: lateral X-rays
(cavum radiographs); posteroanterior occipitomental X-rays (Waters view); and
posteroanterior occipitofrontal X-rays (Caldwell view).The objective of this study was to evaluate the entrance surface air kerma
(Ka,e) for pediatric patients undergoing radiological examinations of
the sinuses at two hospitals in Recife, PE, Brazil. We also estimated the air kerma
values in the thyroid region and around the eyes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted at two public hospitals (hereafter referred to as hospital A
and hospital B), both of which specialized in the care of pediatric patients.
Hospital A has approximately 112 beds, distributed among various clinical areas.
Hospital B is a referral center for maternal and child health, with 714 beds and
more than 600,000 annual visits to its various clinics. Both hospitals are
philanthropic and provide services via the Brazilian Unified Health Care System.
Hospital B has two rooms for performing X-ray examinations, both equipped with
Philips Bucky Diagnost X-ray equipment, whereas hospital A has only one X-ray
examination room, which is equipped with a Shimadzu R 20 X-ray system. None of the
X-ray machines evaluated are equipped with automatic exposure control, and the image
acquisition system is based on radiographic films at both institutions.We created a form designed to collect data related to anthropometric characteristics
of the patient (gender, weight and height), the type of examination/projection, and
the irradiation parameters employed (kV, mAs, focus-to-skin distance, focus-to-film
distance, and exposure time). Data were collected by the authors of the study, and
neither institution maintains nested records of such information. We monitored the
radiological examinations of patients ≤ 15 years of age. For data analysis,
patients were divided into the following age groups: 0-1 year; 1-5 years; 5-10
years; and 10-15 years.
Determination of the K a,e
The Ka,e was determined on the basis of the yield of the X-ray tube
and the irradiation parameters (indirect method). For that purpose, we used a
Radcal ionization chamber, model 20X6-6, positioned in the center of the
radiation field, 100 cm from the focal spot and 30 cm from the surface of the
table. We measured the air kerma for different values of tube voltage (kV),
using a fixed value for the current-time product (mAs). For each kV value, we
made three measurements. The mean value obtained was corrected for the
pressure-temperature factor and for the calibration factor of the ionization
chamber. The calibrations were performed at the Laboratório de Metrologia
das Radiações Ionizantes, Departamento de Energia Nuclear da
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (LMRI/DEN-UFPE, Ionizing Radiation Metrology
Laboratory, Department of Nuclear Energy at the Federal University of
Pernambuco), which follows the standards set by the National Laboratory for the
Metrology of Ionizing Radiation at the Radioprotection and Dosimetry Institute
of the Brazilian National Nuclear Energy Commission. The yield of X-ray
equipment corresponds to the air kerma value (in mGy) per mAs, at a distance of
1 m from the focal spot. A curve for the yields of the different voltage values
was constructed and used for determining the yield under the irradiation
conditions employed in each of the examinations evaluated. For each patient, the
Ka,e was determined by the following equation(:where R is the yield of the X-ray tube for
radiographic technique employed in the examination, interpolated from the yield
curve in function of the voltage, of the R =
a.(kV) type,
a and b being curve fitting parameters;
Q is the product of tube current by exposure time (mAs)
used in the examination; D is a distance of 1 m
for which the yield has been adjusted; DFP is the distance
between the focal point and the skin of the patient; and BSF is
the backscatter factor, which is a function of the size of the field, the
filtration of the equipment and the radiographic technique used in the
examination. A fixed BSF value of 1.30 was adopted(.
Estimation of doses near radiosensitive organs using thermoluminescent
dosimeters
Pairs of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) thermoluminescent dosimeters were encapsulated in
thin plastic casings (one pair per casing) and placed on the skin of the patient
around the eyes and thyroid. The dosimeter pair taken to each institution was
always accompanied by another pair of dosimeters that were not irradiated. The
reading from those dosimeters (in a white casing) was subtracted from the
reading from the irradiated dosimeters. The mean reading of the two dosimeters
contained in each casing was converted into air kerma using the calibration
curve obtained with diagnostic quality X-ray beams at the
LMRI/DEN-UFPE(.
RESULTS
Characteristics of the radiological examinations
Figures 1A and 1B show the age distribution of the patients who underwent
radiological examinations with lateral and posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and
occipitomental) X-rays, respectively. We evaluated 159 radiographs of the
sinuses, of which 103 were lateral X-rays (cavum radiographs) and 56 were
posteroanterior X-rays, including occipitofrontal and occipitomental X-rays
(Caldwell and Waters views, respectively).
Figure 1
Distribution of patients undergoing radiological examination of the
sinuses with lateral X-rays (A) and posteroanterior
X-rays (B), by age group.
Distribution of patients undergoing radiological examination of the
sinuses with lateral X-rays (A) and posteroanterior
X-rays (B), by age group.Approximately 60% of the patients undergoing radiological examination of the
sinuses at either hospital were male. At hospital A, 72.8% of the patients in
whom lateral X-rays were obtained were male, compared with 62.5% of those in
whom posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and occipitomental) X-rays were obtained.
At hospital B, males accounted for 50.0% of the patients undergoing radiological
examination of the sinuses, in either view. Therefore, the gender distribution
was much more balanced among the patients seen at hospital B.
Irradiation parameters
The minimum, mean, and maximum voltage used in lateral and posteroanterior
(occipitofrontal and occipitomental) X-ray examinations of the sinuses are shown
in Table 1. The accuracy and
reproducibility of voltage (kV) values provided by the X-ray machines employed
were previously evaluated using quality protocols devised by the Brazilian
National Ministry of Health(. The variation in the
reproducibility of the voltage value was 0.1% for the equipment at both
hospitals. However, in tests of the variance between the voltage supplied to the
X-ray tube and the value indicated on the panel, the equipment employed at
hospital A showed a variance of 2.2%, whereas the equipment employed in the two
separate X-ray examination rooms at hospital B showed variances of 2.0% and
4.0%, respectively. The minimum, mean, and maximum current-time product (mAs) of
the X-ray tubes used in the radiological examinations of the sinuses (in
lateral, occipitofrontal, or occipitomental X-rays) are shown in Table 2.
Table 1
Voltages used in examinations of the sinuses
Type of
examination
Age group
Voltage (kV)
Hospital A
Hospital B
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Lateral
0–1 year
—
—
—
70
70
70
1–5 years
61
68.82
72
70
71.1
73
5–10 years
60
69.44
74
66
71.71
77
10–15 years
69
74.08
91
70
71.8
73
Occipitofrontal
0–1 year
—
—
—
—
—
—
1–5 years
55
58.33
60
70
75.33
81
5–10 years
60
60.33
62
70
73.5
77
10–15 years
60
60.57
63
—
—
—
Occipitomenta
0–1 year
—
—
—
—
—
—
1–5 years
63
65.33
68
73
76.11
77
5–10 years
63
64.66
65
70
73.33
77
10–15 years
65
65.28
66
—
—
—
Min, minimum; Max, maximum.
Table 2
Current-time products used in examinations of the sinuses.
Type of
examination
Age group
Current-time product (mAs)
Hospital A
Hospital B
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Lateral
0–1 year
—
—
—
4.0
4.67
5.0
1–5 years
2.88
3.37
5.76
4.0
4.95
5.0
5–10 years
2.88
3.74
5.76
4.0
5.15
6.5
10–15 years
3.24
3.51
5.04
5.0
5.0
5.0
Occipitofrontal
0–1 year
—
—
—
—
—
—
1–5 years
20.16
37.92
50.4
5.0
9.65
12.5
5–10 years
43.2
45.6
50.4
5.0
5.0
5.0
10–15 years
50.4
50.4
50.4
20.0
20.0
20.0
Occipitomental
0–1 year
—
—
—
—
—
—
1–5 years
18.0
37.2
50.4
6.3
10.25
12.5
5–10 years
43.2
46.8
50.4
5.0
5.0
5.0
10–15 years
50.4
50.4
50.4
20.0
20.0
20.0
Min, minimum; Max, maximum.
Voltages used in examinations of the sinusesMin, minimum; Max, maximum.Current-time products used in examinations of the sinuses.Min, minimum; Max, maximum.
Ka,e measured from the X-ray tube yield
The distribution of the estimated Ka,e values in radiological
examinations of the sinuses of pediatric patients is shown, by age group, in box
and whisker plots in Figures 2A and 2B for lateral and posteroanterior
(occipitofrontal or occipitomental) X-rays, respectively. In this distribution,
the upper and lower borders of the rectangle correspond to the first and third
quartiles (25% and 75% of the data, respectively). Therefore, the rectangle
itself contains 50% of the data. The line inside the rectangle indicates the
median and the rectangle indicates the mean. The whiskers indicate the maximum
and minimum value of the data. Values outside the distribution (outliers) are
indicated by asterisks. Posteroanterior X-rays of the sinuses are taken from two
views-occipitofrontal and occipitomental-and the values shown correspond to the
sum of the Ka,e for the two views in each patient. For better
visualization, the distributions of the Ka,e values estimated for the
lateral and posteroanterior X-rays of the sinuses obtained at hospital B are
shown in Figures 3A and 3B, respectively.
Figure 2
Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for
radiological examinations of the sinuses with lateral X-rays
(A) and posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and
occipitomental) X-rays (B), by age group, for the two
hospitals participating in the study.
Figure 3
Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for
radiological examinations of the sinuses in lateral (A)
and posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and occipitomental) X-rays
(B), by age group, for hospital B.
Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for
radiological examinations of the sinuses with lateral X-rays
(A) and posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and
occipitomental) X-rays (B), by age group, for the two
hospitals participating in the study.Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for
radiological examinations of the sinuses in lateral (A)
and posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and occipitomental) X-rays
(B), by age group, for hospital B.
Doses near radiosensitive organs, as determined with thermoluminescent
dosimeters
Figures 4A and 4B show the entrance and exit Ka,e values,
respectively, for the area around the eyes of the patients in lateral (paranasal
sinus) X-rays. Figures 5A and (5B show the estimated Ka,e values
for the left and right eyes, respectively, in posteroanterior (occipitofrontal
and occipitomental) X-rays. The distributions of the Ka,e values
estimated for the thyroid region of pediatric patients submitted to lateral and
posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and occipitomental) X-ray examinations of the
sinuses are presented in Figures 6A and
6B, respectively.
Figure 4
Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for the
area around the eyes, in relation to the primary X-ray beam entrance
(A) and exit (B), in lateral X-rays of
the sinuses.
Figure 5
Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for the
area around the left eye (A) and the area around the
right eye (B), in radiological examinations of the
sinuses with posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and occipitomental)
X-rays.
Figure 6
Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for the
region of the thyroid in radiological examinations of the sinuses
with lateral X-rays (A) and posteroanterior
(occipitofrontal and occipitomental) X-rays (B).
Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for the
area around the eyes, in relation to the primary X-ray beam entrance
(A) and exit (B), in lateral X-rays of
the sinuses.Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for the
area around the left eye (A) and the area around the
right eye (B), in radiological examinations of the
sinuses with posteroanterior (occipitofrontal and occipitomental)
X-rays.Distribution of Ka,e values (in mGy) estimated for the
region of the thyroid in radiological examinations of the sinuses
with lateral X-rays (A) and posteroanterior
(occipitofrontal and occipitomental) X-rays (B).
DISCUSSION
For the sinus examinations evaluated, the irradiation parameters shown in Tables 1 and 2 were compared with the data presented in best practice guidelines
developed in England(, which
established quality criteria for such procedures. According to those guidelines, the
voltage used for posteroanterior X-rays obtained in the occipitomental view should
be 65 kV in patients 5-10 years of age and 78 kV for those 10-15 years of age, the
use of such examinations not being recommended in patients under 5 years of age. The
analysis of the results obtained in the present study showed that 25% of the
posteroanterior X-rays obtained in the occipitomental view in patients 5-10 years of
age, at both hospitals, were carried out at voltages higher than that recommended in
the guidelines cited.For lateral X-rays of the sinuses, the best practice guidelines advise the use of 62
kV for patients 1-5 years of age, 65 kV for those 5-10 years of age, and 70 kV for
those 10- 15 years of age. The results of the present study show that the voltages
employed were higher than the recommended values in over 80% of the examinations
carried out at the two hospitals evaluated. That is attributable to the use of an
antiscatter grid, which is not recommended for this age group, because there is no
significant radiation scattering is such small patients. The use of an antiscatter
grid requires the use of higher tube voltages to increase the penetrating power of
the X-ray beam in order to achieve the same image quality.Analyzing the Ka,e values estimated for lateral X-rays (Figure 2A), we observed that nearly all of the
radiological examinations performed at hospital B were in accordance with the
recommendations of the previously cited best practice guidelines, which recommends
Ka,e values of 0 11 mGy, 0.16 mGy, and 0.37 mGy for patients 1-5
years of age, 5-10 years of age, and 10-15 years of age, respectively. Only 2% of
the estimated Ka,e values for examinations performed at that hospital
were above the recommended value, and all of those were in patients 1-5 years of
age. However, all of the Ka,e values estimated for the radiological
examinations performed at hospital A were above reference values specified in the
best practice guidelines, up to 8 times higher in some cases.For radiological examinations of the sinuses involving posteroanterior
(occipitofrontal and occipitomental) X-rays Figures
2B and 3B), we also found the
Ka,e values to be higher in the examinations performed at hospital A
than in those performed at hospital B, and all of the values for the examinations
performed at hospital A were higher than those recommended in the best practice
guidelines, which suggest values of 0.34 mGy and 1.07 mGy for patients 5-10 years of
age and 10-15 years of age, respectively.The excessively high Ka,e values at hospital A, which were, in some cases,
approximately 10 times higher than those observed for hospital B, are attributable
to a number of factors. One such factor is the use of an antiscatter grid, which is
not recommended for pediatric patients because it requires increases in voltage and
current-time product, which can result in higher Ka,e values.For every lateral X-ray of the sinuses requested at hospital A, the X-ray technicians
obtained images of the patient in two conditions: with the mouth closed and with the
mouth open. To our knowledge, there is no mention in the literature of any
difference or benefit related to performing the examination with an open or closed
mouth in terms of the visualization of structures or the facility of making a
clinical diagnosis. The practice serves only to double the Ka,e.It was noted also that the focus-to-skin distances employed were smaller at hospital
A than at hospital B, which also contributed to the higher Ka,e values at
the former. In the radiological examinations of the sinuses involving lateral X-rays
in patients between 1 and 5 years of age, the mean focus-to-skin distance was 73.4
cm at hospital A, compared with 97.0 cm at hospital B.Given that hospital A utilizes cylindrical collimators in examinations of the
sinuses, we expected the air kerma values near the eyes to be lower at hospital A
than at hospital B (Figures 4 and 5). However, our results show that, excluding
the lateral X-rays in patients 10-15 years of age and posteroanterior X-rays in
patients 1-5 years of age, the air kerma values near the eyes were actually higher
at hospital A than at hospital B. That difference can be explained by the data in
Table 2, which shows that, for
posteroanterior (occipitomental and occipitofrontal) X-rays, the mAs values used at
hospital A were approximately three times higher than those used at hospital B. We
also found that, at hospital A, lateral X-rays of the sinuses were obtained in two
conditions (open-mouth and closed-mouth).Recent epidemiological studies of the effects of ionizing radiation have considered
the occurrence of late, noncarcinogenic effects related to tissue changes.
Consequently, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has
issued new recommendations based on the latest knowledge on the biological effects
of radiation(, notable among
which is the new limit for the lens of the eye-0.5 Gy. Therefore, even though the
air kerma values found in the present study were below the new limits established by
the ICRP, it is always important to optimize the radiographic procedure in order to
reduce the dose around the eyes, because of the high radiosensitivity of these
organs.Among the radiological examinations of the sinuses performed at hospital A, the air
kerma values in the thyroid region were higher during lateral X-ray examinations
(Figure 6A) than during posteroanterior
X-ray examinations (Figure 6B). That is
attributable to the fact that the location of the thyroid puts it directly in the
path of the primary X-ray beam when the head of the patient is in profile.As for the area around the eyes, air kerma values in the thyroid region during
lateral X-rays were higher at hospital A than at hospital B, with the exception of
those obtained for examinations performed in patients 10-15 years of age. This again
contraindicates the use of cylindrical collimators (as were used at hospital A), for
the reasons set forth above.There has been little research on the risk of thyroid cancer due to radiological
examinations. Most studies of thyroid cancer risk related to radiation exposure have
dealt with the accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima or with survivors of the atomic
bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki(-(. Studies on the effects that exposure to low doses of
radiation has on the thyroid have dealt with changes in its functioning, such as the
onset of autoimmune diseases and cysts, especially in female patients(.
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study allow us to conclude that, at the two hospitals
under study, the irradiation parameters, especially kV and mAs, are higher than
those recommended in best practice guidelines. The high values of these parameters
are associated with the unnecessary use of antiscatter grids, which are not
recommended for examinations in patients under 10 years of age. Cylindrical
collimators (for restricting the irradiation field size), the use of which is
recommended for radiological examination of the sinuses, were used only by the staff
at hospital A. Despite this protection, the K a,e values obtained for the
examinations performed at that hospital were well above the value suggested in the
best practice guidelines, up to eight times higher in some cases. At both hospitals,
optimization strategies are called for, in order to minimize patient exposure to
radiation and thus reduce the risk of deleterious effects.