Laurette van Boheemen1, Susan E Tett2, Evelien Sohl1, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg3,4, Natasja M van Schoor1, G M E E Peeters5,6. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 3. Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. geeske.peeters@monash.edu. 6. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. geeske.peeters@monash.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Statin therapy may cause myopathy, but long-term effects on physical function are unclear. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether statin use is associated with poorer physical function in two population-based cohorts of older adults. METHODS: Data were from 691 men and women (aged 69-102 years in 2005/2006) in the LASA (Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam) and 5912 women (aged 79-84 years in 2005) in the ALSWH (Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health). Statin use and dose were sourced from containers (LASA) and administrative databases (ALSWH). Physical function was assessed using performance tests, questionnaires on functional limitations and the SF-12 (LASA) and SF-36 (ALSWH) questionnaires. Cross-sectional (both studies) and 3-year prospective associations (ALSWH) were analysed for different statin dosage using linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 25 % of participants in LASA and 61 % in ALSWH used statins. In the cross-sectional models in LASA, statin users were less likely to have functional limitations (percentage of subjects with at least 1 limitation 63.9 vs. 64.2; odds ratio [OR] 0.6; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.9) and had better SF-12 physical component scores (mean [adjusted] 47.3 vs. 44.5; beta [B] = 2.8; 95 % CI 1.1-4.5); in ALSWH, statin users had better SF-36 physical component scores (mean [adjusted] 37.4 vs. 36.5; B = 0.9; 95 % CI 0.3-1.5) and physical functioning subscale scores (mean [adjusted] 55.1 vs. 52.6; B = 2.4; 95 % CI 1.1-3.8) than non-users. Similar associations were found for low- and high-dose users and in the prospective models. In contrast, no significant associations were found with performance tests. CONCLUSIONS: Two databases from longitudinal population studies in older adults gave comparable results, even though different outcome measures were used. In these two large cohorts, statin use was associated with better self-perceived physical function.
BACKGROUND: Statin therapy may cause myopathy, but long-term effects on physical function are unclear. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether statin use is associated with poorer physical function in two population-based cohorts of older adults. METHODS: Data were from 691 men and women (aged 69-102 years in 2005/2006) in the LASA (Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam) and 5912 women (aged 79-84 years in 2005) in the ALSWH (Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health). Statin use and dose were sourced from containers (LASA) and administrative databases (ALSWH). Physical function was assessed using performance tests, questionnaires on functional limitations and the SF-12 (LASA) and SF-36 (ALSWH) questionnaires. Cross-sectional (both studies) and 3-year prospective associations (ALSWH) were analysed for different statin dosage using linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 25 % of participants in LASA and 61 % in ALSWH used statins. In the cross-sectional models in LASA, statin users were less likely to have functional limitations (percentage of subjects with at least 1 limitation 63.9 vs. 64.2; odds ratio [OR] 0.6; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.9) and had better SF-12 physical component scores (mean [adjusted] 47.3 vs. 44.5; beta [B] = 2.8; 95 % CI 1.1-4.5); in ALSWH, statin users had better SF-36 physical component scores (mean [adjusted] 37.4 vs. 36.5; B = 0.9; 95 % CI 0.3-1.5) and physical functioning subscale scores (mean [adjusted] 55.1 vs. 52.6; B = 2.4; 95 % CI 1.1-3.8) than non-users. Similar associations were found for low- and high-dose users and in the prospective models. In contrast, no significant associations were found with performance tests. CONCLUSIONS: Two databases from longitudinal population studies in older adults gave comparable results, even though different outcome measures were used. In these two large cohorts, statin use was associated with better self-perceived physical function.
Authors: Martijn Huisman; Jan Poppelaars; Marleen van der Horst; Aartjan T F Beekman; Johannes Brug; Theo G van Tilburg; Dorly J H Deeg Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Shelly L Gray; Aaron K Aragaki; Michael J LaMonte; Barbara B Cochrane; Charles Kooperberg; Jennifer G Robinson; Nancy F Woods; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-11-23 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Gail McAvay; Heather G Allore; Andrew B Cohen; Danijela Gnjidic; Terrence E Murphy; Mary E Tinetti Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrew R Zullo; Richard Ofori-Asenso; Marci Wood; Allison Zuern; Yoojin Lee; Wen-Chih Wu; James L Rudolph; Danny Liew; Michael A Steinman Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 4.669