Literature DB >> 27137818

Induction and separation of motion artifacts in EEG data using a mobile phantom head device.

Anderson S Oliveira1, Bryan R Schlink, W David Hairston, Peter König, Daniel P Ferris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electroencephalography (EEG) can assess brain activity during whole-body motion in humans but head motion can induce artifacts that obfuscate electrocortical signals. Definitive solutions for removing motion artifact from EEG have yet to be found, so creating methods to assess signal processing routines for removing motion artifact are needed. We present a novel method for investigating the influence of head motion on EEG recordings as well as for assessing the efficacy of signal processing approaches intended to remove motion artifact. APPROACH: We used a phantom head device to mimic electrical properties of the human head with three controlled dipolar sources of electrical activity embedded in the phantom. We induced sinusoidal vertical motions on the phantom head using a custom-built platform and recorded EEG signals with three different acquisition systems while the head was both stationary and in varied motion conditions. MAIN
RESULTS: Recordings showed up to 80% reductions in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and up to 3600% increases in the power spectrum as a function of motion amplitude and frequency. Independent component analysis (ICA) successfully isolated the three dipolar sources across all conditions and systems. There was a high correlation (r > 0.85) and marginal increase in the independent components' (ICs) power spectrum (∼15%) when comparing stationary and motion parameters. The SNR of the IC activation was 400%-700% higher in comparison to the channel data SNR, attenuating the effects of motion on SNR. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that the phantom head and motion platform can be used to assess motion artifact removal algorithms and compare different EEG systems for motion artifact sensitivity. In addition, ICA is effective in isolating target electrocortical events and marginally improving SNR in relation to stationary recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27137818     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  22 in total

1.  Corrigendum: Multimodal Imaging of Brain Activity to Investigate Walking and Mobility Decline in Older Adults (Mind in Motion Study): Hypothesis, Theory, and Methods.

Authors:  David J Clark; Todd M Manini; Daniel P Ferris; Chris J Hass; Babette A Brumback; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Marco Pahor; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  Statistical Analysis to Find out the Optimal Locations for Non Invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Restricted vision increases sensorimotor cortex involvement in human walking.

Authors:  Anderson S Oliveira; Bryan R Schlink; W David Hairston; Peter König; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Combined head phantom and neural mass model validation of effective connectivity measures.

Authors:  Steven M Peterson; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Integrated 3D motion analysis with functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging to identify neural correlates of lower extremity movement.

Authors:  Manish Anand; Jed A Diekfuss; Alexis B Slutsky-Ganesh; Dustin R Grooms; Scott Bonnette; Kim D Barber Foss; Christopher A DiCesare; Jennifer L Hunnicutt; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Proposing Metrics for Benchmarking Novel EEG Technologies Towards Real-World Measurements.

Authors:  Anderson S Oliveira; Bryan R Schlink; W David Hairston; Peter König; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  3D Printed Dry EEG Electrodes.

Authors:  Sammy Krachunov; Alexander J Casson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A Channel Rejection Method for Attenuating Motion-Related Artifacts in EEG Recordings during Walking.

Authors:  Anderson S Oliveira; Bryan R Schlink; W David Hairston; Peter König; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Systems, Subjects, Sessions: To What Extent Do These Factors Influence EEG Data?

Authors:  Andrew Melnik; Petr Legkov; Krzysztof Izdebski; Silke M Kärcher; W David Hairston; Daniel P Ferris; Peter König
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Cortical responses to whole-body balance perturbations index perturbation magnitude and predict reactive stepping behavior.

Authors:  Teodoro Solis-Escalante; Mitchel Stokkermans; Michael X Cohen; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.