Literature DB >> 32166505

Statistical Analysis to Find out the Optimal Locations for Non Invasive Brain Stimulation.

Gaurav Sharma1, Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury2.   

Abstract

Non-invasive brain electrical stimulation (NIBES) techniques are progressively used for modulation of neuronal membrane potentials, which alters cortical excitability. The neuronal activity depends on position of channel locations for electrodes and the amount and direction of injected weak current through the target neurons area. In the present paper hybrid near infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalogram (NIRS-EEG) open access dataset for brain computer interface (BCI) has been used to find the best locations for NIBES. The percentage oxygen saturation has been calculated with the help of provided NIRS experimental dataset of changes in concentration of oxy-hemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxy-hemoglobin (Hb) in thirty-six scalp site locations of twenty-eight healthy subjects. The variation in standard deviation have been calculated for given pre-processed EEG signals of thirty locations for same twenty-eight healthy subjects. The statistical one-way ANOVA method has been used to find out the best channels and locations which are having less variation in all motion artifacts. In this method, F value is calculated for these locations and those locations are selected which are significant at 99% confidence interval (P < 0.01). In this study, out of sixty-six locations sixteen best locations have been selected for non-invasive brain electrical stimulation. This pilot study has been used to find out the appropriate locations on the scalp sites to place the electrodes to provide weak direct current stimulation which are less affected by motion artifacts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain computer interface; Electroencephalogram; Near infrared spectroscopy; Non-invasive brain electrical stimulation; Transcranial electrical stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32166505     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-1535-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  36 in total

1.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of "return" electrode's position and size.

Authors:  M Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Jen Scaturro
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulation of picture naming and word reading: A meta-analysis of single session tDCS applied to healthy participants.

Authors:  Samuel J Westwood; Cristina Romani
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Development of Point of Care Testing Device for Neurovascular Coupling From Simultaneous Recording of EEG and NIRS During Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Utkarsh Jindal; Mehak Sood; Anirban Dutta; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 5.  Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Andrea Antal; Samar S Ayache; David H Benninger; Jérôme Brunelin; Filippo Cogiamanian; Maria Cotelli; Dirk De Ridder; Roberta Ferrucci; Berthold Langguth; Paola Marangolo; Veit Mylius; Michael A Nitsche; Frank Padberg; Ulrich Palm; Emmanuel Poulet; Alberto Priori; Simone Rossi; Martin Schecklmann; Sven Vanneste; Ulf Ziemann; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Neurovascular coupling and epilepsy: hemodynamic markers for localizing and predicting seizure onset.

Authors:  Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.500

7.  Pre-treatment letter fluency performance predicts antidepressant response to transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Donel M Martin; Kevin Yeung; Colleen K Loo
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 8.  Evidence-Based Guidelines and Clinical Pathways in Stroke Rehabilitation-An International Perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Platz
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).

Authors:  Mauricio F Villamar; Magdalena Sarah Volz; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Alexandre F Dasilva; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and language.

Authors:  Alessia Monti; Roberta Ferrucci; Manuela Fumagalli; Francesca Mameli; Filippo Cogiamanian; Gianluca Ardolino; Alberto Priori
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.