Literature DB >> 21908521

What are cancer patients' experiences and preferences for the provision of written information in the palliative care setting? A focus group study.

Kim Tomlinson1, Stephanie Barker, Katie Soden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whilst there is a wide range of literature pertaining to the need for excellent verbal communication within the palliative care setting, there is a paucity of research designed to identify the written informational needs of such patients. AIM: To identify the experiences and wishes of patients known to a specialist palliative care service in England with regards to written information. We considered both generalizable written information (such as leaflets, books and internet resources) as well as individualized information (for example, copies of letters given to patients).
DESIGN: Five focus group discussions were recorded and transcribed for analysis. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The focus groups took place at one specialist palliative care unit in England. Twenty-two patients with cancer over the age of 18 years were recruited.
RESULTS: Inductive, realist thematic analysis of the data set was performed. Themes have been broadly categorized into three main areas: (i) patients' views on the role of written information, (ii) their experiences of written information in different formats, and (iii) their thoughts on what written information they would most value.
CONCLUSIONS: Written information needs for this patient group vary greatly, sometimes in ways which can be predicted. Using a patient-centred approach to elicit information around an individual's coping strategies, desire for knowledge and empowerment may be helpful. The data supports a proactive approach to making available (to those who want them) clear, concise and attractive leaflets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21908521     DOI: 10.1177/0269216311419988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  6 in total

1.  Utility of a Referral Letter to Improve Comprehensibility of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: a Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Eva-Marie Kloeppel; Hani Hanaya; Eckart Seilacher; Sarah Schroth; Patrick Liebl; Christian Keinki; Marie Jolin Koester; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Unmet care needs in people living with advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nima Moghaddam; Helen Coxon; Sally Nabarro; Beth Hardy; Karen Cox
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Satisfaction with information and its association with illness perception and quality of life in Indonesian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Aulia Iskandarsyah; Cora de Klerk; Dradjat R Suardi; Monty P Soemitro; Sawitri S Sadarjoen; Jan Passchier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  The quality of care of the dying in hospital-next-of-kin perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Heckel; Annika R Vogt; Stephanie Stiel; Johannes Radon; Sandra Kurkowski; Swantje Goebel; Christoph Ostgathe; Martin Weber
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  The level of knowledge about palliative care in Iranian patients with cancer.

Authors:  Dadgari Atena; Bagheri Imane; Rassouli Maryam; Salmani Naiire; Tahani Fatemeh
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Developing a complex intervention to support timely engagement with palliative care for patients with advanced cancer in primary and secondary care in the UK: a study protocol.

Authors:  Julia Hackett; Hilary Bekker; Michael I Bennett; Paul Carder; Jean Gallagher; Claire Henry; Suzanne Kite; Sally Taylor; Galina Velikova; Lucy Ziegler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.