| Literature DB >> 27137126 |
Kelly C Wrighton1, Cindy J Castelle2, Vanessa A Varaljay1, Sriram Satagopan1, Christopher T Brown3, Michael J Wilkins1,4, Brian C Thomas2, Itai Sharon2, Kenneth H Williams5, F Robert Tabita1, Jillian F Banfield2,6.
Abstract
Metagenomic studies recently uncovered form II/III RubisCO genes, originally thought to only occur in archaea, from uncultivated bacteria of the candidate phyla radiation (CPR). There are no isolated CPR bacteria and these organisms are predicted to have limited metabolic capacities. Here we expand the known diversity of RubisCO from CPR lineages. We report a form of RubisCO, distantly similar to the archaeal form III RubisCO, in some CPR bacteria from the Parcubacteria (OD1), WS6 and Microgenomates (OP11) phyla. In addition, we significantly expand the Peregrinibacteria (PER) II/III RubisCO diversity and report the first II/III RubisCO sequences from the Microgenomates and WS6 phyla. To provide a metabolic context for these RubisCOs, we reconstructed near-complete (>93%) PER genomes and the first closed genome for a WS6 bacterium, for which we propose the phylum name Dojkabacteria. Genomic and bioinformatic analyses suggest that the CPR RubisCOs function in a nucleoside pathway similar to that proposed in Archaea. Detection of form II/III RubisCO and nucleoside metabolism gene transcripts from a PER supports the operation of this pathway in situ. We demonstrate that the PER form II/III RubisCO is catalytically active, fixing CO2 to physiologically complement phototrophic growth in a bacterial photoautotrophic RubisCO deletion strain. We propose that the identification of these RubisCOs across a radiation of obligately fermentative, small-celled organisms hints at a widespread, simple metabolic platform in which ribose may be a prominent currency.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27137126 PMCID: PMC5113843 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2016.53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Summary of CPR genomes reported in this study
| PER_GWA2_38_35 | Peregrinibacteria | 95 | 5 | 38.2 | 1.11 | 1020 | II/III | |
| PER-2* | PER_GWF2_38_29 | Peregrinibacteria | 93 | 23 | 38 | 1.23 | 1164 | II/III |
| PER-3 | PER_GWF2_39_17 | Peregrinibacteria | 100 | 15 | 38.8 | 1.31 | 1129 | II/III |
| PER-4 | PER_GWC2_39_14 | Peregrinibacteria | 98 | 21 | 38.5 | 1.32 | 1247 | II/III |
| PER-5 | PER_GWF2_43_17 | Peregrinibacteria | 100 | 16 | 43.1 | 1.20 | 1136 | II/III |
| WS6_GWF2_39_15 | Dojkabacteria | 100 (closed) | 1 | 38.7 | 0.896 | 891 | II/III | |
| WS6-2 | WS6_GWC1_33_20 | Dojkabacteria | 98 | 23 | 32.7 | 0.65 | 666 | III-like |
| WS6-3 | GWF1_WS6_37_7 | Dojkabacteria | 100 | 18 | 36.7 | 1.22 | 1153 | III-like |
| WS6-4 | WS6_GWE2_33_157 | Dojkabacteria | 100 | 29 | 32.8 | 0.61 | 628 | III-like |
| WS6-5 | WS6_GWE1_33_547 | Dojkabacteria | 95 | 34 | 32.5 | 0.61 | 649 | III-like |
| WS6-6 | WS6_GWF1_33_233 | Dojkabacteria | 98 | 23 | 32.7 | 0.61 | 640 | III-like |
| OD1-1 | OD1_GWE2_42_8 | Parcubacteria | 93 | 34 | 42.5 | 0.743 | 781 | III-like |
| OD1-2 | OD1_RIFOXA1_OD1_43_6 | Parcubacteria | 84 | 183 | 31.7 | 0.67 | 850 | III-like |
| OP11-1 | OP11_GWA2_42_18 | Microgenomates | 95 | 53 | 42.3 | 1.24 | 1324 | III-like |
| OP11-2 | GWA2_OP11_43_14 | Microgenomates | 100 | 24 | 43.2 | 1.65 | 1699 | III-like |
| OP11-3 | RBG_16_OP11_37_8 | Microgenomates | 95 | 84 | 37.5 | 1.31 | 1506 | III-like |
Abbreviation: CPR, candidate phyla radiation. Bolded text includes manually curated and confirmed near-complete or complete genomes, while asterisk (*) denotes RubisCO that was cloned and functionally confirmed.
Figure 1Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed for the RubisCO large subunit. Key bootstrap values >50 are shown based on 100 resamplings. Protein models of the PER and Dojkabacteria (WS6) type II/III RubisCOs and the Dojkabacteria and Parcubacterium (OD1) type III-like RubisCOs are included. The asterisk (*) refers to genomes that are complete or nearly complete and hand-curated. The additional inserts of the form II/III RubisCO from the closed Dojkabacteria genome (48 residues) or of the form III-like from the Parcubacterium genome (24 residues) are highlighted in red on the protein models (Expanded view shown in Supplementary Figure S6).
Figure 2Conservation of RubisCO active-site residues. Alignment of active-site residues from representative RubisCO and RLP sequences as noted previously by Tabita , along with equivalent residues from the new sequences described in this study. Residues are noted in single-letter IUPAC code. Coloring scheme is based on the identities of residues relative to the Synechococcus elongatus PCC 6301 reference sequence. Amino-acid numbering according to Synechococcus elongatus PCC 6301 reference sequence have been indicated. Green shading refers to conserved residues, yellow indicates semi-conserved residues and red represents non-conserved residues. Catalytic (C) and RuBP-binding (R) residues are indicated on the top; X denotes missing residue. The RubisCO motif refers to a stretch of conserved residues that are proximal in the primary structure and is identified by consensus residue identities shaded gray. Residues K, D and E from this motif participate in catalysis.
Figure 3Proposed metabolic role of RubisCO, with genes identified in the PER-1 (blue line) and WS6-1 genomes (purple line). Black lines indicate genes not identified in either organism. Thick blue arrows represent genes identified by metatranscriptomics (Supplementary Table S4). Yellow lines denoted the proposed PRPP pathway indicated in the text. Abbreviations not indicated in the text: G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; PGLS, 6-phosphogluconolactonase; hxlB, 6-phospho-3-hexuloisomerase; hxlA, 3-hexulose-6-phosphate synthase Pgm, phosphoglucomutase; GPI, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase; FBP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase; Aldo, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, Pgk, phosphoglycerate kinase; TIM, triosephosphate isomerase; GpmI, 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase; Eno, enolase; PK, pyruvate kinase; PFOR, pyruvate/2-oxoacid-ferredoxin oxidoreductase; ACS, Acetyl-CoA synthetase; PTA, phosphotransacetylase; ackA, acetate kinase; RpiA, ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A; RPE, ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase; Tkt, transkelotase; Tal, transaldolase; APRT, adenine phosphoribosyltransferase; PRPP synthetase, ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase; DAK, glycerone kinase; DAS, dihydroxyacetone synthase; AMPase, AMP phosphorylase; isomerase, Ribose 1,5-bisphosphate isomerase; NMP, nucleoside 5′-monophosphate.
Figure 4Gene neighborhoods near the form II/III RubisCO (a) as well as AMP phosphorylase and R15P isomerase (b) from the PER-1 genome. (a) RubisCO (red) clusters with genes for pyridmidine and purine metabolism. (b) Genes for producing acetate (blue) are near two homologs from the AMP pathway (dark green). Gene clusters were organized and visualized using Geneious v7.0.6.
Figure 5Photoautotrophic growth complemented by the PER form II/III RubisCO gene in Rhodobacter capsulatus strain SB I/II−. (a) p80::Rhodospirillum rubrum cbbM; (b) pRPS-MCS3::Archaeoglobus fulgidus rbcL; (c) p80::Perigrinibacteria rbcL; (d) empty vector. Anaerobic CO2-dependent photoautotrophic growth was obtained using Ormerod's minimal medium agar plates in a sealed jar flushed with a 5% CO2/95% H2 gas mixture. (e) Anaerobic CO2-dependent growth was performed in sealed tubes continuously bubbled with a 5% CO2/95% H2 gas mixture. Each data point represent the average±s.d. of triplicate cultures.