Literature DB >> 30936488

Proposal of the reverse flow model for the origin of the eukaryotic cell based on comparative analyses of Asgard archaeal metabolism.

Anja Spang1,2, Courtney W Stairs3, Nina Dombrowski4,5, Laura Eme3, Jonathan Lombard3, Eva F Caceres3, Chris Greening6, Brett J Baker5, Thijs J G Ettema7,8.   

Abstract

The origin of eukaryotes represents an unresolved puzzle in evolutionary biology. Current research suggests that eukaryotes evolved from a merger between a host of archaeal descent and an alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont. The discovery of the Asgard archaea, a proposed archaeal superphylum that includes Lokiarchaeota, Thorarchaeota, Odinarchaeota and Heimdallarchaeota suggested to comprise the closest archaeal relatives of eukaryotes, has helped to elucidate the identity of the putative archaeal host. Whereas Lokiarchaeota are assumed to employ a hydrogen-dependent metabolism, little is known about the metabolic potential of other members of the Asgard superphylum. We infer the central metabolic pathways of Asgard archaea using comparative genomics and phylogenetics to be able to refine current models for the origin of eukaryotes. Our analyses indicate that Thorarchaeota and Lokiarchaeota encode proteins necessary for carbon fixation via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway and for obtaining reducing equivalents from organic substrates. By contrast, Heimdallarchaeum LC2 and LC3 genomes encode enzymes potentially enabling the oxidation of organic substrates using nitrate or oxygen as electron acceptors. The gene repertoire of Heimdallarchaeum AB125 and Odinarchaeum indicates that these organisms can ferment organic substrates and conserve energy by coupling ferredoxin reoxidation to respiratory proton reduction. Altogether, our genome analyses suggest that Asgard representatives are primarily organoheterotrophs with variable capacity for hydrogen consumption and production. On this basis, we propose the 'reverse flow model', an updated symbiogenetic model for the origin of eukaryotes that involves electron or hydrogen flow from an organoheterotrophic archaeal host to a bacterial symbiont.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30936488     DOI: 10.1038/s41564-019-0406-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Microbiol        ISSN: 2058-5276            Impact factor:   17.745


  80 in total

1.  Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity.

Authors:  Katarzyna Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka; Eva F Caceres; Jimmy H Saw; Disa Bäckström; Lina Juzokaite; Emmelien Vancaester; Kiley W Seitz; Karthik Anantharaman; Piotr Starnawski; Kasper U Kjeldsen; Matthew B Stott; Takuro Nunoura; Jillian F Banfield; Andreas Schramm; Brett J Baker; Anja Spang; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Genomic exploration of the diversity, ecology, and evolution of the archaeal domain of life.

Authors:  Anja Spang; Eva F Caceres; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A new view of the tree of life.

Authors:  Laura A Hug; Brett J Baker; Karthik Anantharaman; Christopher T Brown; Alexander J Probst; Cindy J Castelle; Cristina N Butterfield; Alex W Hernsdorf; Yuki Amano; Kotaro Ise; Yohey Suzuki; Natasha Dudek; David A Relman; Kari M Finstad; Ronald Amundson; Brian C Thomas; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 17.745

Review 4.  The archaeal legacy of eukaryotes: a phylogenomic perspective.

Authors:  Lionel Guy; Jimmy H Saw; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Anja Spang; Jimmy H Saw; Steffen L Jørgensen; Katarzyna Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka; Joran Martijn; Anders E Lind; Roel van Eijk; Christa Schleper; Lionel Guy; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Lokiarchaea are close relatives of Euryarchaeota, not bridging the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Violette Da Cunha; Morgan Gaia; Daniele Gadelle; Arshan Nasir; Patrick Forterre
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Asgard archaea are the closest prokaryotic relatives of eukaryotes.

Authors:  Anja Spang; Laura Eme; Jimmy H Saw; Eva F Caceres; Katarzyna Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka; Jonathan Lombard; Lionel Guy; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Genomic reconstruction of a novel, deeply branched sediment archaeal phylum with pathways for acetogenesis and sulfur reduction.

Authors:  Kiley W Seitz; Cassandre S Lazar; Kai-Uwe Hinrichs; Andreas P Teske; Brett J Baker
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 9.  Open Questions on the Origin of Eukaryotes.

Authors:  Purificación López-García; David Moreira
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 10.  Endosymbiotic theories for eukaryote origin.

Authors:  William F Martin; Sriram Garg; Verena Zimorski
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority.

Authors:  William H Lewis; Guillaume Tahon; Patricia Geesink; Diana Z Sousa; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Metabolic potentials of archaeal lineages resolved from metagenomes of deep Costa Rica sediments.

Authors:  Ibrahim F Farag; Jennifer F Biddle; Rui Zhao; Amanda J Martino; Christopher H House; Rosa I León-Zayas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 3.  Molecular Hydrogen Metabolism: a Widespread Trait of Pathogenic Bacteria and Protists.

Authors:  Stéphane L Benoit; Chris Greening; Robert J Maier; R Gary Sawers
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Expanding Asgard members in the domain of Archaea sheds new light on the origin of eukaryotes.

Authors:  Ruize Xie; Yinzhao Wang; Danyue Huang; Jialin Hou; Liuyang Li; Haining Hu; Xiaoxiao Zhao; Fengping Wang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 6.038

5.  The trickster microbes that are shaking up the tree of life.

Authors:  Traci Watson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Diverse Asgard archaea including the novel phylum Gerdarchaeota participate in organic matter degradation.

Authors:  Mingwei Cai; Yang Liu; Xiuran Yin; Zhichao Zhou; Michael W Friedrich; Tim Richter-Heitmann; Rolf Nimzyk; Ajinkya Kulkarni; Xiaowen Wang; Wenjin Li; Jie Pan; Yuchun Yang; Ji-Dong Gu; Meng Li
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.038

Review 7.  Diversity, ecology and evolution of Archaea.

Authors:  Brett J Baker; Valerie De Anda; Kiley W Seitz; Nina Dombrowski; Alyson E Santoro; Karen G Lloyd
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 17.745

8.  Cofactor F420: an expanded view of its distribution, biosynthesis and roles in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Rhys Grinter; Chris Greening
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 16.408

9.  Expanded diversity of Asgard archaea and their relationships with eukaryotes.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Kira S Makarova; Wen-Cong Huang; Yuri I Wolf; Anastasia N Nikolskaya; Xinxu Zhang; Mingwei Cai; Cui-Jing Zhang; Wei Xu; Zhuhua Luo; Lei Cheng; Eugene V Koonin; Meng Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Subgroup level differences of physiological activities in marine Lokiarchaeota.

Authors:  Xiuran Yin; Mingwei Cai; Yang Liu; Guowei Zhou; Tim Richter-Heitmann; David A Aromokeye; Ajinkya C Kulkarni; Rolf Nimzyk; Henrik Cullhed; Zhichao Zhou; Jie Pan; Yuchun Yang; Ji-Dong Gu; Marcus Elvert; Meng Li; Michael W Friedrich
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.