Literature DB >> 27136741

Prognostic value of Ki67 in localized prostate carcinoma: a multi-institutional study of >1000 prostatectomies.

M S Tretiakova1, W Wei2, H D Boyer3, L F Newcomb1,3, S Hawley4, H Auman4, F Vakar-Lopez1, J K McKenney5, L Fazli6, J Simko7, D A Troyer8, A Hurtado-Coll6, I M Thompson9, P R Carroll7, W J Ellis1,3, M E Gleave6, P S Nelson1,3, D W Lin1,3, L D True1, Z Feng2, J D Brooks10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Expanding interest in and use of active surveillance for early state prostate cancer (PC) has increased need for prognostic biomarkers. Using a multi-institutional tissue microarray resource including over 1000 radical prostatectomy samples, we sought to correlate Ki67 expression captured by an automated image analysis system with clinicopathological features and validate its utility as a clinical grade test in predicting cancer-specific outcomes.
METHODS: After immunostaining, the Ki67 proliferation index (PI) of tumor areas of each core (three cancer cores/case) was analyzed using a nuclear quantification algorithm (Aperio). We assessed whether Ki67 PI was associated with clinicopathological factors and recurrence-free survival (RFS) including biochemical recurrence, metastasis or PC death (7-year median follow-up).
RESULTS: In 1004 PCs (∼4000 tissue cores) Ki67 PI showed significantly higher inter-tumor (0.68) than intra-tumor variation (0.39). Ki67 PI was associated with stage (P<0.0001), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI, P=0.02), extracapsular extension (ECE, P<0.0001) and Gleason score (GS, P<0.0001). Ki67 PI as a continuous variable significantly correlated with recurrence-free, overall and disease-specific survival by multivariable Cox proportional hazard model (hazards ratio (HR)=1.04-1.1, P=0.02-0.0008). High Ki67 score (defined as ⩾5%) was significantly associated with worse RFS (HR=1.47, P=0.0007) and worse overall survival (HR=2.03, P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: In localized PC treated by radical prostatectomy, higher Ki67 PI assessed using a clinical grade automated algorithm is strongly associated with a higher GS, stage, SVI and ECE and greater probability of recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27136741      PMCID: PMC5536893          DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  28 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Glen Kristiansen
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Perineural invasion and MIB-1 positivity in addition to Gleason score are significant preoperative predictors of progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J Sebo; John C Cheville; Darren L Riehle; Christine M Lohse; V Shane Pankratz; Robert P Myers; Michael L Blute; Horst Zincke
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.

Authors:  Laura H Tang; Mithat Gonen; Cyrus Hedvat; Irvin M Modlin; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67 antigen, cox-2 and Bax/Bcl-2 in prostate cancer; prognostic value in biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  J Rubio; D Ramos; J A López-Guerrero; I Iborra; A Collado; E Solsona; S Almenar; A Llombart-Bosch
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK).

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube; Massimo Gion; Gary M Clark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  An intra- and interobserver reproducibility analysis of the Ki-67 proliferation marker assessment on core biopsies of breast cancer patients and its potential clinical implications.

Authors:  András Vörös; Erika Csörgő; Tibor Nyári; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Prognostic significance of proliferation activity and neuroendocrine differentiation to predict treatment failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthias May; Michael Siegsmund; Fränze Hammermann; Volker Loy; Sven Gunia
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-07-27

8.  Proliferation of immature tumor vessels is a novel marker of clinical progression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karsten Gravdal; Ole J Halvorsen; Svein A Haukaas; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Torsten O Nielsen; Roger A'Hern; John Bartlett; R Charles Coombes; Jack Cuzick; Matthew Ellis; N Lynn Henry; Judith C Hugh; Tracy Lively; Lisa McShane; Soon Paik; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Ljudmila Prudkin; Meredith Regan; Janine Salter; Christos Sotiriou; Ian E Smith; Giuseppe Viale; Jo Anne Zujewski; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review.

Authors:  Elisabeth Luporsi; Fabrice André; Frédérique Spyratos; Pierre-Marie Martin; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Laurent Arnould; Anne Gompel; Caroline Egele; Bruno Poulet; Krishna B Clough; Hubert Crouet; Alain Fourquet; Jean-Pierre Lefranc; Carole Mathelin; Nicolas Rouyer; Daniel Serin; Marc Spielmann; Margaret Haugh; Marie-Pierre Chenard; Etienne Brain; Patricia de Cremoux; Jean-Pierre Bellocq
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  17 in total

1.  Is Ki67 prognostic for aggressive prostate cancer? A multicenter real-world study.

Authors:  Joseph J Fantony; Lauren E Howard; Ilona Csizmadi; Andrew J Armstrong; Amy L Lark; Colette Galet; William J Aronson; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.851

2.  Loss of Expression of AZGP1 Is Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort.

Authors:  James D Brooks; Wei Wei; Jonathan R Pollack; Robert B West; Jun Ho Shin; John B Sunwoo; Sarah J Hawley; Heidi Auman; Lisa F Newcomb; Jeff Simko; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Dean A Troyer; Peter R Carroll; Martin E Gleave; Daniel W Lin; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Lawrence D True; Jesse K McKenney; Ziding Feng; Ladan Fazli
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Cationic Dendrimers for siRNA Delivery: An Overview of Methods for In Vitro/In Vivo Characterization.

Authors:  Erik Laurini; Suzana Aulic; Domenico Marson; Maurizio Fermeglia; Sabrina Pricl
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Mechanistic modelling of prostate-specific antigen dynamics shows potential for personalized prediction of radiation therapy outcome.

Authors:  Guillermo Lorenzo; Víctor M Pérez-García; Alfonso Mariño; Luis A Pérez-Romasanta; Alessandro Reali; Hector Gomez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  DNA Damage Induces a Secretory Program in the Quiescent TME that Fosters Adverse Cancer Phenotypes.

Authors:  Luis Gomez-Sarosi; Yu Sun; Ilsa Coleman; Daniella Bianchi-Frias; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  High Inter- and Intratumoral Variability of Ki67 Labeling Index in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer with High Gleason Scores.

Authors:  Tatjana Vlajnic; Patrik Brunner; Serenella Eppenberger-Castori; Cyrill A Rentsch; Tobias Zellweger; Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.916

7.  An analysis of a multiple biomarker panel to better predict prostate cancer metastasis after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alison Y Zhang; Karen Chiam; Ygal Haupt; Stephen Fox; Simone Birch; Wayne Tilley; Lisa M Butler; Karen Knudsen; Clay Comstock; Krishan Rasiah; Judith Grogan; Kate L Mahon; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Carmela Ricciardelli; Maret Böhm; Susan Henshall; Warick Delprado; Phillip Stricker; Lisa G Horvath; James G Kench
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  The role of androgen receptors in vascular and cell proliferation of the prostate adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Andrei Pănuş; Claudiu Mărgăritescu; Petru Octavian Drăgoescu; Paul Ioan Tomescu; Mihai Lucian Ştefănescu; Alex Emilian Stepan
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.033

9.  MUC1 Expression by Immunohistochemistry Is Associated with Adverse Pathologic Features in Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Okyaz Eminaga; Wei Wei; Sarah J Hawley; Heidi Auman; Lisa F Newcomb; Jeff Simko; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Dean A Troyer; Peter R Carroll; Martin E Gleave; Daniel W Lin; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Lawrence D True; Jesse K McKenney; Ziding Feng; Ladan Fazli; James D Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MEIS1 down-regulation by MYC mediates prostate cancer development through elevated HOXB13 expression and AR activity.

Authors:  Nichelle C Whitlock; Shana Y Trostel; Scott Wilkinson; Nicholas T Terrigino; S Thomas Hennigan; Ross Lake; Nicole V Carrabba; Rayann Atway; Elizabeth D Walton; Berkley E Gryder; Brian J Capaldo; Huihui Ye; Adam G Sowalsky
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.