| Literature DB >> 27134768 |
Jesus Pujol1, Raquel Fenoll2, Dídac Macià2, Gerard Martínez-Vilavella2, Mar Alvarez-Pedrerol3, Ioar Rivas4, Joan Forns3, Joan Deus5, Laura Blanco-Hinojo2, Xavier Querol6, Jordi Sunyer7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Children are more vulnerable to the effects of environmental elements. A variety of air pollutants are among the identified factors causing neural damage at toxic concentrations. It is not obvious, however, to what extent the tolerated high levels of air pollutants are able to alter brain development. We have specifically investigated the neurotoxic effects of airborne copper exposure in school environments.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; brain development; copper; diffusion tensor imaging; fMRI; neurodegenerative disorders
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27134768 PMCID: PMC4842931 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Behav Impact factor: 2.708
Characteristics of study samples
| Whole sample ( | MRI sample ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 49.5% girls 50.5% boys | 48.3% girls 51.7% boys |
| Age, years, mean ± SD (range) | 9.4 ± 0.9 (7.9–12.1) | 9.7 ± 0.9 (8.0–12.1) |
| Overall school achievement, 5‐point scale | 3.5 ± 1.1 (1–5) | 3.7 ± 1.0 (1–5) |
| Difficulties score (SDQ), range 0–40 | 8.4 ± 5.2 (0–32) | 8.8 ± 5.3 (0–25) |
| Obesity: Normal | 72.1% | 71.4% |
| Overweight, BMI ≥ 25–29.9 kg/m2 | 18.5% | 18.4% |
| Obesity, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 | 9.4% | 10.2% |
| Mother education (5‐point scale, 5 = University) | 4.4 ± 0.8 (1–5) | 4.5 ± 0.8 (1–5) |
| Father education (5‐point scale, 5 = University) | 4.4 ± 0.8 (1–5) | 4.4 ± 0.8 (1–5) |
| Vulnerability index | 0.45 ± 0.21 (0.06–1.0) | 0.43 ± 0.21 (0.06–0.90) |
| Vulnerability index | 0.42 ± 0.21 (0.13–0.84) | 0.43 ± 0.22 (0.13–0.84) |
| Public/Nonpublic school | 36% vs. 64% | 43% vs. 57% |
| Task performance | ||
| Reaction time (mean of medians, msec) | 671.5 ± 124.6 (389–1277) | 650.6 ± 119.9 (431–1091) |
| Reaction time standard deviation (msec) | 235.7 ± 91.1 (60.6–598.6) | 222.9 ± 91.2 (77.5–571.6) |
| Commission errors (number) | 4.0 (3.1%) ± 4.2 (0–50) | 4.3 (3.4%) ± 5–0 (0–49) |
| Omission errors (number) | 1.4 (1.1%) ± 3.6 (0–94) | 1.6 (1.3%) ± 3.9 (0–44) |
BMI, body mass index; SDQ, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Neighborhood socioeconomic status vulnerability index based on the level of education, unemployment, and occupation at the census tract (Atlas de vulnerabilidad urbana de España, 2012).
Figure 1Correlation of copper measurements with brain tissue composition. Higher copper levels correlated with higher gray matter (presumably expressing lower white matter) concentration in the caudate nucleus bilaterally. The right hemisphere corresponds to the right side of axial and coronal views.
MRI correlation results
| Cluster size, mL |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copper versus gray matter concentration | |||
| R Caudate nucleus‐positive correlation | 4.09 | 8, 19, 3 | 3.12 |
| L Caudate nucleus‐positive correlation | 4.09 (same cluster) | −3, 16, 6 | 3.12 |
| Copper versus fractional anisotropy | |||
| R Caudate nucleus‐positive correlation | 1.40 | 11, 9, 9 | 3.8 |
| L Caudate nucleus‐positive correlation | 9.23 | −8, 9, 10 | 3.9 |
| L Supracaudate white matter‐positive correlation | 9.23 (same cluster) | −17, 20, 25 | 3.6 |
| L Suprathalamic white matter‐positive correlation | 9.23 (same cluster) | −20, −17, 28 | 3.4 |
| R Corpus callosum‐positive correlation | 1.90 | 17, −40, 13 | 3.8 |
| Reaction time versus fractional anisotropy | |||
| L Supracaudate white matter‐positive correlation | 1.46 | −15, 11, 21 | 3.6 |
| Reaction time SD versus fractional anisotropy | |||
| L Supracaudate white matter‐positive correlation | 4.29 | −17, 10, 19 | 3.9 |
| R Supracaudate white matter‐positive correlation | 3.60 | 19, 15, 20 | 4.1 |
|
| |||
| Left caudate nucleus seed map | |||
| R Frontal operculum‐negative correlation | 5.85 | 48, 2, 16 | 4.2 |
| L Frontal operculum‐negative correlation | 3.30 | −38, 14, 12 | 3.9 |
| Right frontal operculum seed map | |||
| L Caudate nucleus‐negative correlation | 2.35 | −14, 22, 8 | 3.9 |
| R Caudate nucleus‐negative correlation | 1.39 | 16, 22, 10 | 3.1 |
| Left frontal operculum seed map | |||
| L Caudate nucleus‐negative correlation | 1.30 | −16, 24, 6 | 4.4 |
| Frontal medial seed map | |||
| L Frontal operculum‐positive correlation | 3.29 | −44, 32, −2 | 3.2 |
| L Auditory cortex‐positive correlation | 1.72 | −50, −18, 2 | 3.5 |
| L Medial frontal cortex‐positive correlation | 1.42 | −12, 22, 44 | 3.9 |
| R Visual cortex‐negative correlation | 12.81 | 14, −54, 2 | 3.8 |
| Supplementary motor area seed map | |||
| L Supramarginal gyrus‐positive correlation | 1.08 | −56, −34, 24 | 3.6 |
SD, standard deviation.
x, y, z coordinates given in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space. Statistics at corrected threshold P FWE < 0.05 estimated using Monte Carlo simulations.
Figure 2Diffusion tensor imaging results. Higher copper levels correlated with higher FA (fractional anisotropy) predominantly in caudate nucleus region (top panel). The correlation with motor performance (bottom panel) showed both slower reaction time and larger reaction time standard deviation associated with higher FA in white matter adjacent to the caudate nucleus. The right hemisphere corresponds to the right side. Y denotes “y” MNI coordinates.
Figure 3Diffusion tensor imaging tractographic display of a representative participant. The colors are coded to show diffusion‐defined left–right tracts in red, anterior–posterior tracts in green, and superior–inferior tracts in blue. Note convergence of the three directions in our region of interest (white rectangle).
Figure 4Water diffusion direction changes related to copper. Correlation of copper measurements with water diffusion along the three (x, y, z) axes separately and superimposed in a single RGB color display (thresholded at P = 0.001 in MRIcron®). Color regions express sites where higher copper levels were associated with reduced diffusion for one or more directions. The most evident changes were along the right–left (red), anterior–posterior (green) directions, or both (yellow) (note that regions with mixed effects show RGB composite colors). The right hemisphere corresponds to the right side of axial and coronal views. X, Y, Z, denote MNI coordinates.
Figure 5Correlation of copper measurements with functional connectivity MRI. Within the frontal operculum functional connectivity map (left panel), copper was associated with a connectivity reduction between the frontal (seed) region of interest (green sphere) and the caudate nuclei. Reciprocally, within the caudate nucleus functional connectivity map (right panel), copper was associated with a connectivity reduction between the caudate nucleus seed region (green sphere) and the frontal lobe opercula.
Potentially relevant airborne elements and their correlation with Cu
| Measures from 39 schools | Mean ± SD | Range | Corr, with Cu | Shared variance (adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon (C), | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 0.6–3.9 | 0.41 | 15% |
| Manganese (Mn), ng/m3 | 15.3 ± 13.8 | 3.7–64.8 | 0.22 | 2% |
| Lead (Pb), ng/m3 | 8.1 ± 2.8 | 4.3–16.8 | 0.46 | 19% |
| Iron (Fe), | 0.6 ± 0.6 | 0.1–3.0 | 0.15 | 0.4% |
| Antimony (Sb), ng/m3 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 0.4–2.4 | 0.75 | 55% |
Cu, copper; SD, standard deviation.
Behavior and imaging changes associated with air copper (copper range, 3.7–13.8 ng/m3)
| Whole sample ( | Mean ± SD |
| 95% CI (adjusted 95% CI) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motor speed (reaction time) | 671 ± 124 msec | 2.2 (4.7) ms/(ng/m3) | 0.6 to 3.7 (1.8 to 7.5) ms/(ng/m3) | 2.7 | 0.006 |
| Motor response consistency (reaction time SD) | 235 ± 91 msec | 2.9 (3.4) ms/(ng/m3) | 1.7 to 4.0 (1.4 to 5.5) ms/(ng/m3) | 4.9 | 8e‐7 |
| MRI sample ( | |||||
| Motor response consistency (reaction time SD) | 224 ± 91 msec | 4.2 (9.6) ms/(ng/m3) | 0.5 to 7.9 (1.7 to 17.6) ms/(ng/m3) | 2.2 | 0.026 |
| Gray matter concentration L caudate nucleus | 14.2 ± 3.9 GMc | 0.3 (0.3) GMc/(ng/m3) | 0.1 to 0.4 (0.1 to 0.5) GMc/(ng/m3) | 3.1 | 0.001 |
| Fractional anisotropy DTI L caudate nucleus | 16 ± 1 FAi | 0.1 (0.1) FAi/(ng/m3) | 0.06 to 0.2 (0.05 to 0.2) FAi/(ng/m3) | 3.9 | 0.0001 |
| Functional connectivity L frontal cortex to L caudate | 0.3 ± 1.1 FCi | −0.1 (−0.1) FCi/(ng/m3) | −0.14 to −0.05 (−0.2 to −0.1) FCi/(ng/m3) | −4.4 | 0.00001 |
SD, standard deviation; β, β coefficients from the regressions with copper as the predictor factor; GMc, percentage of gray matter concentration; FAi, anisotropy index expressed in the range of 0–100 units; FCi, strength of functional connectivity expressed in arbitrary units.
n varied in each imaging modality (see Methods section).
Socioeconomic status, a general indicator of traffic pollution (elemental carbon) and other potentially toxic agents (Pb, Mn, Sb, and Fe) were used in the adjusted model.