Literature DB >> 34394481

Communication with invasive mechanically ventilated patients and the use of alternative devices: integrative review.

Aziza Salem1, Muayyad M Ahmad2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication with patients has always been a major concern in nursing care. Invasive mechanically ventilated (IMV) patients suffer from a communication barrier due to the presence of the endotracheal tube (ETT), which makes them unable to communicate through speech. AIM: The purpose of this review is to examine available evidence regarding existing knowledge, skills, perceptions and barriers to IMV patient communication in order to guide the development of strategies that enhance effective communication with these patients.
METHODS: A review of the published literature was conducted between January 2010 and December 2016.
RESULTS: The literature support clear and concise communication in all areas of care, especially when patients suddenly become speechless. Invasive mechanically ventilated patients want to be heard, have control over their treatment and contribute to decisions concerning their health.
CONCLUSION: There is a need for the establishment of an effective nurse -patient communication strategy, which may include determining the mode of communication used by the patient, waiting and giving time to allow a patient to participate in the communication, confirming the message that was communicated with a patient himself/ herself, and the use of assistive and augmented communication to support comprehension when needed.
© The Author(s) 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; communication strategies; critical care; intensive care unit; invasive mechanical ventilation

Year:  2018        PMID: 34394481      PMCID: PMC7932057          DOI: 10.1177/1744987118785987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Nurs        ISSN: 1744-9871


  18 in total

1.  What We Write about When We Write About AAC: The Past 30 Years of Research and Future Directions.

Authors:  David McNaughton; Janice Light
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Putting people first: re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention.

Authors:  Janice Light; David McNaughton
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Determining the effectiveness of illustrated communication material for communication with intubated patients at an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Münevver Otuzoğlu; Azize Karahan
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.066

4.  Communication difficulties and psychoemotional distress in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Rabia Khalaila; Wajdi Zbidat; Kabaha Anwar; Abed Bayya; David M Linton; Sigal Sviri
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Evaluation of Speak for Myself with Patients Who Are Voiceless.

Authors:  Rebecca S Koszalinski; Ruth M Tappen; David Viggiano
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 1.625

6.  Nurses' perceptions of communication training in the ICU.

Authors:  Jill V Radtke; Judith A Tate; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.072

7.  Enhancing the Communication of Suddenly Speechless Critical Care Patients.

Authors:  Carmen S Rodriguez; Meredeth Rowe; Loris Thomas; Jonathan Shuster; Brent Koeppel; Paula Cairns
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  A pilot study of eye-tracking devices in intensive care.

Authors:  Jonah Garry; Kelly Casey; Therese Kling Cole; Angela Regensburg; Colleen McElroy; Eric Schneider; David Efron; Albert Chi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Gaze-controlled, computer-assisted communication in Intensive Care Unit: "speaking through the eyes".

Authors:  F Maringelli; N Brienza; F Scorrano; F Grasso; C Gregoretti
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Ten Hoorn; P W Elbers; A R Girbes; P R Tuinman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating the Use of Communication Board on Cortisol Level and Physiological Parameters in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Authors:  Anahita Divani; Arpi Manookian; Shima Haghani; Mohsen Meidani; Mojdeh Navidhamidi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2022-05-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.