Literature DB >> 27132634

Co-production as an approach to developing stakeholder partnerships to reduce mental health inequalities: an evaluation of a pilot service.

Saumu Lwembe1, Stuart A Green2, Jennifer Chigwende3, Tom Ojwang4, Ruth Dennis5.   

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to evaluate a pilot cross-sector initiative - bringing together public health, a community group, primary mental health teams and patients - in using co-production approaches to deliver a mental health service to meet the needs of the black and minority ethnic communities.
BACKGROUND: Black and minority ethnic communities continue to face inequalities in mental health service access and provision. They are under-represented in low-level interventions as they are less likely to be referred, and more likely to disengage from mainstream mental health services. Effective models that lead to improved access and better outcomes are yet to be established. It has long been recognised that to be effective, services need to be more culturally competent, which may be achieved through a co-production approach.
METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate the role of co-production in the development of a novel community mental health service for black and minority ethnic service users. Qualitative research methods, including semi-structured interviews and focus groups, were used to collect data to examine the use of co-production methods in designing and delivering an improved mental health service. Findings Twenty-five patients enrolled into the study; of these, 10 were signposted for more intensive psychological support. A 75% retention rate was recorded (higher than is generally the case for black and minority ethnic service users). Early indications are that the project has helped overcome barriers to accessing mental health services. Although small scale, this study highlights an alternative model that, if explored and developed further, could lead to delivery of patient-centred services to improve access and patient experience within mental health services, particularly for black and minority ethnic communities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BME mental health; anxiety; coproduction; ethnicity; health inequalities; minority groups; psychotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27132634     DOI: 10.1017/S1463423616000141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev        ISSN: 1463-4236            Impact factor:   1.458


  10 in total

1.  The Importance of Evaluating Health Disparities Research.

Authors:  Bruce A Dye; Deborah G Duran; David M Murray; John W Creswell; Patrick Richard; Tilda Farhat; Nancy Breen; Michael M Engelgau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  How does the use of digital consulting change the meaning of being a patient and/or a health professional? Lessons from the Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication study.

Authors:  Jackie Sturt; Caroline Huxley; Btihaj Ajana; Caitjan Gainty; Chris Gibbons; Tanya Graham; Zarnie Khadjesari; Federica Lucivero; Rebecca Rogers; Annie Smol; Jocelyn A Watkins; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  A qualitative study of minority ethnic women's experiences of access to and engagement with perinatal mental health care.

Authors:  Sabrina Pilav; Kaat De Backer; Abigail Easter; Sergio A Silverio; Sushma Sundaresh; Sara Roberts; Louise M Howard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis.

Authors:  David Clarke; Fiona Jones; Ruth Harris; Glenn Robert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Laura-Louise Arundell; Helen Greenwood; Helen Baldwin; Eleanor Kotas; Shubulade Smith; Kasia Trojanowska; Chris Cooper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-26

6.  Co-producing Randomized Controlled Trials: How Do We Work Together?

Authors:  Lucy Pollyanna Goldsmith; Rosaleen Morshead; Charlotte McWilliam; Gordon Forbes; Michael Ussher; Alan Simpson; Mike Lucock; Steve Gillard
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2019-03-29

7.  Technology for Healthy Aging and Wellbeing: Co-producing Solutions.

Authors:  Arlene J Astell; Jacob A Andrews; Matthew R Bennion; David Clayton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-02

8.  What Is the Co-Creation of New Knowledge? A Content Analysis and Proposed Definition for Health Interventions.

Authors:  Tania Pearce; Myfanwy Maple; Anthony Shakeshaft; Sarah Wayland; Kathy McKay
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Psychosocial volunteer support for older adults with cognitive impairment: development of MyCare Ageing using a codesign approach via action research.

Authors:  Darshini Ayton; Renée O'Donnell; Dave Vicary; Catherine Bateman; Chris Moran; Velandai K Srikanth; Julie Lustig; Jane Banaszak-Holl; Peter Hunter; Elizabeth Pritchard; Heather Morris; Melissa Savaglio; Seema Parikh; Helen Skouteris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy for bipolar affective disorder: A co-produced single subject cumulative treatment design with extended follow-up (A1 /B/A2 /C-FU).

Authors:  Stephen Kellett; Lisa Alhadeff; Chris Gaskell; Melanie Simmonds-Buckley
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.966

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.