Literature DB >> 27132212

Efficacy of the MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected MAGE-A3-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (MAGRIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Johan F Vansteenkiste1, Byoung Chul Cho2, Tonu Vanakesa3, Tommaso De Pas4, Marcin Zielinski5, Moon Soo Kim6, Jacek Jassem7, Masahiro Yoshimura8, Jubrail Dahabreh9, Haruhiku Nakayama10, Libor Havel11, Haruhiko Kondo12, Tetsuya Mitsudomi13, Konstantinos Zarogoulidis14, Oleg A Gladkov15, Katalin Udud16, Hirohito Tada17, Hans Hoffman18, Anders Bugge19, Paul Taylor20, Emilio Esteban Gonzalez21, Mei Lin Liao22, Jianxing He23, Jean-Louis Pujol24, Jamila Louahed25, Muriel Debois25, Vincent Brichard25, Channa Debruyne25, Patrick Therasse25, Nasser Altorki26.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fewer than half of the patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are cured. Since the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy in 2004, no substantial progress has been made in adjuvant treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic in surgically resected NSCLC.
METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited patients aged at least 18 years with completely resected stage IB, II, and IIIA MAGE-A3-positive NSCLC who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy from 443 centres in 34 countries (Europe, the Americas, and Asia Pacific). Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 13 intramuscular injections of recMAGE-A3 with AS15 immunostimulant (MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic) or placebo during 27 months. Randomisation and treatment allocation at the investigator site was done centrally via internet with stratification for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. A minimisation algorithm accounted for the number of chemotherapy cycles received, disease stage, lymph node sampling procedure, performance status score, and lifetime smoking status. The primary endpoint was broken up into three co-primary objectives: disease-free survival in the overall population, the no-chemotherapy population, and patients with a potentially predictive gene signature. The final analyses included the total treated population (all patients who had received at least one treatment dose). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00480025.
FINDINGS: Between Oct 18, 2007, and July 17, 2012, we screened 13 849 patients for MAGE-A3 expression; 12 820 had a valid sample and of these, 4210 (33%) had a MAGE-A3-positive tumour. 2312 of these patients met all eligibility criteria and were randomly assigned to treatment: 1515 received MAGE-A3 and 757 received placebo and 40 were randomly assigned but never started treatment. 784 patients in the MAGE-A3 group also received chemotherapy, as did 392 in the placebo group. Median follow-up was 38·1 months (IQR 27·9-48·4) in the MAGE-A3 group and 39·5 months (27·9-50·4) in the placebo group. In the overall population, median disease-free survival was 60·5 months (95% CI 57·2-not reached) for the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic group and 57·9 months (55·7-not reached) for the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 95% CI 0·89-1·18; p=0·74). Of the patients who did not receive chemotherapy, median disease-free survival was 58·0 months (95% CI 56·6-not reached) in those in the MAGE-A3 group and 56·9 months (44·4-not reached) in the placebo group (HR 0·97, 95% CI 0·80-1·18; p=0·76). Because of the absence of treatment effect, we could not identify a gene signature predictive of clinical benefit to MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic. The frequency of grade 3 or worse adverse events was similar between treatment groups (246 [16%] of 1515 patients in the MAGE-A3 group and 122 [16%] of 757 in the placebo group). The most frequently reported grade 3 or higher adverse events were infections and infestations (37 [2%] in the MAGE-A3 group and 19 [3%] in the placebo group), vascular disorders (30 [2%] vs 17 [3%]), and neoplasm (benign, malignant, and unspecified (29 [2%] vs 16 [2%]).
INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant treatment with the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic did not increase disease-free survival compared with placebo in patients with MAGE-A3-positive surgically resected NSCLC. Based on our results, further development of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic for use in NSCLC has been stopped. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27132212     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00099-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  145 in total

1.  Characterization and comparison of innate and adaptive immune responses at vaccine sites in melanoma vaccine clinical trials.

Authors:  Marit M Melssen; Karlyn E Pollack; Max O Meneveau; Mark E Smolkin; Joel Pinczewski; Alexander F Koeppel; Stephen D Turner; Katia Sol-Church; Alexandra Hickman; Donna H Deacon; Gina R Petroni; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 2.  A review of guidelines for lung cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Bironzo; Massimo Di Maio
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy in lung cancer.

Authors:  Neeraj Bhalla; Rachel Brooker; Michael Brada
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Vaccine and immune cell therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Helena Oliveres; Christian Caglevic; Francesco Passiglia; Simona Taverna; Evelien Smits; Christian Rolfo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Is there a room for immune checkpoint inhibitors in early stage non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Elisa Gobbini; Matteo Giaj Levra
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  BCMA peptide-engineered nanoparticles enhance induction and function of antigen-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes against multiple myeloma: clinical applications.

Authors:  Jooeun Bae; Neha Parayath; Wenxue Ma; Mansoor Amiji; Nikhil Munshi; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Cancer-Germline Antigen Expression Discriminates Clinical Outcome to CTLA-4 Blockade.

Authors:  Sachet A Shukla; Pavan Bachireddy; Bastian Schilling; Christina Galonska; Qian Zhan; Clyde Bango; Rupert Langer; Patrick C Lee; Daniel Gusenleitner; Derin B Keskin; Mehrtash Babadi; Arman Mohammad; Andreas Gnirke; Kendell Clement; Zachary J Cartun; Eliezer M Van Allen; Diana Miao; Ying Huang; Alexandra Snyder; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Levi A Garraway; Alexander Meissner; Jeffrey S Weber; Nir Hacohen; Donna Neuberg; Patrick R Potts; George F Murphy; Christine G Lian; Dirk Schadendorf; F Stephen Hodi; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Standard of care in immunotherapy trials: Challenges and considerations.

Authors:  Gareth Rivalland; Andrew M Scott; Thomas John
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Update on Tumor Neoantigens and Their Utility: Why It Is Good to Be Different.

Authors:  Chung-Han Lee; Roman Yelensky; Karin Jooss; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 10.  Adjuvant Therapy of Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: can We Move Forward?

Authors:  Lucio Buffoni; Tiziana Vavalà; Silvia Novello
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.