Literature DB >> 27131923

Quantification of abdominal aortic aneurysm stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography and its comparison to aneurysm diameter.

Arunark Kolipaka1, Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani2, William Kenyhercz3, Joshua D Dowell2, Michael R Go4, Jean E Starr4, Patrick S Vaccaro4, Richard D White5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) wall stiffness has been suggested to be an important factor in the overall rupture risk assessment compared with anatomic measure. We hypothesize that AAA diameter will have no correlation to AAA wall stiffness. The aim of this study is to (1) determine magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-derived aortic wall stiffness in AAA patients and its correlation to AAA diameter; (2) determine the correlation between AAA stiffness and amount of thrombus and calcium; and (3) compare the AAA stiffness measurements against age-matched healthy individuals.
METHODS: In vivo abdominal aortic MRE was performed on 36 individuals (24 patients with AAA measuring 3-10 cm and 12 healthy volunteers), aged 36 to 78 years, after obtaining written informed consent under the approval of the Institutional Review Board. MRE images were processed to obtain spatial stiffness maps of the aorta. AAA diameter, amount of thrombus, and calcium score were reported by experienced interventional radiologists. Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Mann-Whitney test were performed to determine the correlation between AAA stiffness and diameter and to determine the significant difference in stiffness measurements between AAA patients and healthy individuals.
RESULTS: No significant correlation (P > .1) was found between AAA stiffness and diameter or amount of thrombus or calcium score. AAA stiffness (mean 13.97 ± 4.2 kPa) is significantly (P ≤ .02) higher than remote normal aorta in AAA (mean 8.87 ± 2.2 kPa) patients and in normal individuals (mean 7.1 ± 1.9 kPa).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that AAA wall stiffness may provide additional information independent of AAA diameter, which may contribute to our understanding of AAA pathophysiology, biomechanics, and risk for rupture.
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27131923      PMCID: PMC5036977          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  36 in total

1.  Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall.

Authors:  G W Schurink; J M van Baalen; M J Visser; J H van Bockel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  MR elastography of the in vivo abdominal aorta: a feasibility study for comparing aortic stiffness between hypertensives and normotensives.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; David Woodrum; Philip A Araoz; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography as a method to estimate myocardial contractility.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Shivani R Aggarwal; Kiaran P McGee; Nandan Anavekar; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Higher-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Meningiomas to Determine Intratumoral Consistency.

Authors:  Joshua D Hughes; Nikoo Fattahi; J Van Gompel; Arvin Arani; Fredric Meyer; Giuseppe Lanzino; Michael J Link; Richard Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  MR elastography of the human abdominal aorta: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Jun Chen; Kevin J Glaser; Meng Yin; Phillip J Rossman; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  S C Nicholls; J B Gardner; M H Meissner; H K Johansen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Meng Yin; James F Glockner; Naoki Takahashi; Philip A Araoz; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Collagen types and matrix protein content in human abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  R J Rizzo; W J McCarthy; S N Dixit; M P Lilly; V P Shively; W R Flinn; J S Yao
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 10.  The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Intraluminal Thrombus: Current Concepts of Development and Treatment.

Authors:  Aleksandra Piechota-Polanczyk; Alicja Jozkowicz; Witold Nowak; Wolf Eilenberg; Christoph Neumayer; Tadeusz Malinski; Ihor Huk; Christine Brostjan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-05-26
View more
  12 in total

1.  Quantification of breast stiffness using MR elastography at 3 Tesla with a soft sternal driver: A reproducibility study.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Hawley; Prateek Kalra; Xiaokui Mo; Brian Raterman; Lisa D Yee; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  In vivo quantification of aortic stiffness using MR elastography in hypertensive porcine model.

Authors:  Huiming Dong; Ria Mazumder; Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani; Xiaokui Mo; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  MR Elastography of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Relationship to Aneurysm Events.

Authors:  Huiming Dong; Brian Raterman; Richard D White; Jean Starr; Patrick Vaccaro; Mounir Haurani; Michael Go; Mariah Eisner; Guy Brock; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 4.  Advances and Future Direction of Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Huiming Dong; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

5.  A bayesian method for accelerated magnetic resonance elastography of the liver.

Authors:  Christopher Ebersole; Rizwan Ahmad; Adam V Rich; Lee C Potter; Huiming Dong; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  In Vivo Aortic Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Validation in an Animal Model.

Authors:  Huiming Dong; Duncan S Russell; Alan S Litsky; Matthew E Joseph; Xiaokui Mo; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 10.065

7.  A novel method for non-invasively detecting the severity and location of aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Igor Sazonov; Ashraf W Khir; Wisam S Hacham; Etienne Boileau; Jason M Carson; Raoul van Loon; Colin Ferguson; Perumal Nithiarasu
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-02-21

8.  Image-Based 3D Characterization of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Deformation After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Karen López-Linares; Inmaculada García; Ainhoa García; Camilo Cortes; Gemma Piella; Iván Macía; Jérôme Noailly; Miguel A González Ballester
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-01

9.  Towards enabling a cardiovascular digital twin for human systemic circulation using inverse analysis.

Authors:  Neeraj Kavan Chakshu; Igor Sazonov; Perumal Nithiarasu
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance elastography: A review.

Authors:  Saad Khan; Faisal Fakhouri; Waqas Majeed; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.