Melioidosis is an emerging infectious disease caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in endemic areas. Antibiotic treatment is protracted and not always successful; even with appropriate therapy, up to 40% of individuals presenting with melioidosis in Thailand succumb to infection. In these circumstances, an effective vaccine has the potential to have a dramatic impact on both the scale and the severity of disease. Currently, no vaccines are licensed for human use. A leading vaccine candidate is the capsular polysaccharide consisting of a homopolymer of unbranched 1→3 linked 2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose. Here, we present the chemical synthesis of this challenging antigen using a novel modular disaccharide assembly approach. The resulting hexasaccharide was coupled to the nontoxic Hc domain of tetanus toxin as a carrier protein to promote recruitment of T-cell help and provide a scaffold for antigen display. Mice immunized with the glycoconjugate developed IgM and IgG responses capable of recognizing native capsule, and were protected against infection with over 120 × LD50 of B. pseudomallei strain K96243. This is the first report of the chemical synthesis of an immunologically relevant and protective hexasaccharide fragment of the capsular polysaccharide of B. pseudomallei and serves as the rational starting point for the development of an effective licensed vaccine for this emerging infectious disease.
Melioidosis is an emerging infectious disease caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in endemic areas. Antibiotic treatment is protracted and not always successful; even with appropriate therapy, up to 40% of individuals presenting with melioidosis in Thailand succumb to infection. In these circumstances, an effective vaccine has the potential to have a dramatic impact on both the scale and the severity of disease. Currently, no vaccines are licensed for human use. A leading vaccine candidate is the capsular polysaccharide consisting of a homopolymer of unbranched 1→3 linked 2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose. Here, we present the chemical synthesis of this challenging antigen using a novel modular disaccharide assembly approach. The resulting hexasaccharide was coupled to the nontoxic Hc domain of tetanus toxin as a carrier protein to promote recruitment of T-cell help and provide a scaffold for antigen display. Mice immunized with the glycoconjugate developed IgM and IgG responses capable of recognizing native capsule, and were protected against infection with over 120 × LD50 of B. pseudomallei strain K96243. This is the first report of the chemical synthesis of an immunologically relevant and protective hexasaccharide fragment of the capsular polysaccharide of B. pseudomallei and serves as the rational starting point for the development of an effective licensed vaccine for this emerging infectious disease.
Melioidosis is a serious and often fatal
disease caused by the
Gram negative, facultative intracellular pathogen Burkholderia
pseudomallei.[1] The disease
is prevalent in South-East Asia and Northern Australia, although the
area of endemicity is expanding rapidly as surveillance improves and
cases are described in other countries (ref (2); see www.melioidosis.info for up-to-date global distribution). The clinical presentation of
melioidosis is varied, ranging from localized infections and abscess
formation through to acute pulmonary infections and fulminating septicaemias.[3,4] Antibiotic therapies are available for melioidosis, typically requiring
several weeks of intravenous administration followed by orally delivered
antibiotics which may last several months.[5] Overall mortality in individuals presenting with melioidosis at
medical facilities varies by country (∼40% in Thailand, ∼15%
in Australia), but mortality can be up to 90% with septicaemic melioidosis,
even with appropriate antibiotic therapy.[4,6,7] Due to the nonspecific presentation, the
rapid course of disease, the intrinsic resistance of B. pseudomallei to commonly used antibiotics, and
the risk posed by aerosolized bacteria if deliberately released, B. pseudomallei is currently classified as a CDC
Tier 1 Select Agent under 42 CFR Part 73 (see http://www.selectagents.gov/).At present there is no licensed vaccine to protect against
melioidosis.
Considerable work has been undertaken to identify and develop vaccine
candidates which will protect humans against melioidosis (for recent
reviews, see refs (8−10)). From these studies,
the manno-heptopyranose capsular polysaccharide (CPS)
has emerged as a leading candidate. This polysaccharide is a homopolymer
of unbranched 1→3 linked 2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose[11,12] and is a major virulence determinant in B. pseudomallei.[13,14] Interestingly, B. pseudomallei appears to express only this single serotype of capsule and it is
present in all reported isolates; the same is true for all isolates
of the related pathogen Burkholderia mallei, the causative agent of glanders.[15] A
capsule-based vaccine would therefore potentially offer cross-species
protection against both pathogens. Recent work has demonstrated that
CPS purified from B. pseudomallei induces
protective immunity against experimentally induced melioidosis in
mice[16] and that immune responses and protection
can be significantly improved through conjugation of the polysaccharide
to a carrier protein.[17,18] However, current methodology
requires that CPS is purified from bacteria in containment (at least
BioSafety Level 2), a manufacturing process which is both technically
demanding and expensive, and may not readily translate to commercial
scale manufacturing. Moreover, the purified native CPS also displays
heterogeneity of chain length and may contain copurified endotoxin
or other polysaccharides,[19] introducing
complications to analysis, handling, and quality control. A synthetic
source of CPS wherein all structural features of the antigen are unequivocally
defined and established chemical manufacturing infrastructure could
be utilized would be more appropriate as a choice for the antigen
in a CPS-based vaccine.The B. pseudomallei/mallei CPS presents
a variety of structural aspects that render it a challenging target
for chemical synthesis. Specifically, β-mannoside linkages are
traditionally problematical[20] and the presence
of the one-carbon chain-extension at the pyranoseC-6 precludes standard
implementation of approaches to β-mannosides using 4,6-benzylidene
protected donors developed by the Crich group[20] and adapted by others.[21,22] Furthermore, the presence
of the potentially labile and migration prone 2-O-acetyl group on each residue necessitates a highly engineered protecting
group strategy; this group has been shown to be necessary for antigen
recognition by monoclonal antibodies,[23] although whether this is relevant to protective immunity has not
been examined. A recent study has detailed an elegant approach to
the synthesis of a protected β-(1,3)-linked manno-heptopyranosedisaccharide[24] utilizing
installation of the C-6 one-carbon chain extension at the monosaccharide
stage and chain extension via intramolecular aglycon delivery. However,
this work did not extend the glycan chain past the disaccharide stage
or investigate whether this disaccharide could induce protective immune
responses.This work describes a novel approach to the chemical
synthesis
of a 1→3 linked 2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose hexasaccharide using
a modular disaccharide assembly approach. This hexasaccharide was
covalently linked to a recombinant carrier protein to improve immunogenicity
and the resulting glycoconjugate shown to stimulate production of
antibodies specific for native CPS and to confer significant protection
in mice following a challenge with a lethal dose of B. pseudomallei.
Results and Discussion
Retrosynthetic
Analysis of Capsular Antigen Target 1
Synthetic hexameric
capsular polysaccharide antigen 1 (SHCPS)
was designed to incorporate all of the distinguishing
structural features of the natural polysaccharide in addition to a
reducing end linker moiety that would allow for directed conjugation
to a carrier protein (Figure ). The choice of a hexasaccharide versus a target of different
length would simultaneously provide a size likely to be immunologically
relevant,[25,26] although the minimum protective epitope
for this antigen is not currently known, and would provide a vehicle
for development of an efficient modular assembly approach for the
synthesis of antigens and fragments featuring an even number of repeating
heptosides. In designing the synthesis there was a need to identify
assembly and final deblock sequences that minimized manipulation and
complex chemical operations on large, potentially sensitive synthetic
intermediates. In an effort to identify an efficient route with a
high probability of success, many strategies were considered, including:
(i) assembly of a β-mannopyranoseoligosaccharide framework
followed by installation of the C-6 one-carbon chain extension on
each monosaccharide residue either sequentially or en masse. While
this approach would allow implementation of the proven β-mannoside
synthesis methodology,[20] it would require
six multistep C-6 homologations during assembly; (ii) installation
of the C-6 one-carbon chain extension at the monosaccharide building
block stage, followed by assembly of a poly-β-d-gluco-heptopyranose hexasaccharide and performing six inversions
at the C-2 position of each residue to establish the desired β-d-manno-heptose stereochemistry. This option
would require significant late stage manipulation of a fully assembled
hexasaccharide and would rely on the C-2 position in every monosaccharide
residue being sterically accessible for inversion; (iii) installation
of the C-6 one-carbon chain extension at the monosaccharide stage
but assemble the hexasaccharide backbone via intramolecular aglycon
delivery.[27] Indeed, this approach has recently
been described for the synthesis of a protected β-(1,3)-linked manno-heptopyranosedisaccharide.[24] The reservations with this strategy, however, were the uncertainty
of the efficiency of this methodology for assembling larger oligosaccharides
and the considerable manipulation that would be required on valuable
advanced synthetic intermediates. Recent publications during the completion
of this work have indeed demonstrated the successful implementation
of intramolecular aglycon delivery for assembly of large oligosaccharides;[28,29] therefore, intramolecular aglycon delivery represents a potential
alternative approach to oligosaccharides such as (1).
Figure 1
Manno-heptopyranose antigens in this study. (A)
Structure of natural capsular polysaccharide from B.
pseudomallei. In this rendering the polysaccharide
is anchored to a lipooligosaccharide (LOS) at the reducing end, although
it should be noted that the molecule to which the capsule is anchored
is not currently known. (B) Structure of synthetic hexameric capsular
polysaccharide target antigen 1.
Manno-heptopyranose antigens in this study. (A)
Structure of natural capsular polysaccharide from B.
pseudomallei. In this rendering the polysaccharide
is anchored to a lipooligosaccharide (LOS) at the reducing end, although
it should be noted that the molecule to which the capsule is anchored
is not currently known. (B) Structure of synthetic hexameric capsular
polysaccharide target antigen 1.Thus, the initial strategy was centered on option (ii) using
a
C-6 homologated gluco-configured monosaccharide building
block, which was to be used for iterative coupling to form β-gluco-heptopyranose linkages during assembly. In this case,
inversion at C-2 of the nonreducing end residue would be performed
at each assembly iteration to yield the desired β-manno configuration. Such a strategy, based on a C-2 keto-donor followed by postcoupling reduction, was implemented successfully
for the construction of a C. albicans derived poly-β-mannoside[30] based
on the pioneering work by Lichtenthaler.[31] More recently, a postcoupling C-2 inversion approach via C-2 triflate
ester displacement by azide was utlilized to achieve the β-d-ManNAcA configuration en route to the synthesis of the repeating
unit of the S. aureus type 5 capsular
polysaccharide.[32] While this approach circumvents
the challenges associated with multiple late-stage inversion transformations,
and indeed was successful for smaller oligosaccharides, the significant
amount of manipulation required on larger structures was a major concern.
As a result, modest re-engineering of the strategy allowed implementation
of a modular disaccharide assembly approach using key disaccharide
building block 2 (Figure ), which was amenable to large-scale preparation from
a single monosaccharide building block 5 and had the
majority of the required stereochemistry and functionality already
built in. Specifically, building block 2 incorporated
the requisite C-6 chain extensions and a β-manno-heptose linkage between the two monosaccharide residues. The reducing
end gluco-heptose residue, which served as the donor
group during assembly, was fitted at C-2 with the 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethyl
butanoyl (ADMB) ester,[33] a participating
ester group to control the glycosylation stereochemistry, minimize
the potential for orthoester formation during assembly, and enable
regioselective liberation of the C-2 hydroxyl for subsequent inversion
to the β-manno configuration. Benzoyl esters
were also considered, but benzoates were envisaged as protecting groups
for the manno-C-2 positions in the growing chain
to allow late-stage installation of the critical 2-O-acetates in the final structure. The protecting group for the manno-C-3 position required facile and selective removal
to liberate the 3-hydroxyl as the acceptor for the next assembly cycle.
Many protecting groups with reactivity orthogonal to that of the benzoyl
and ADMB esters were evaluated in scouting studies, but it was concluded
that the use of O-acetates for both manno-C-3 and manno-C-2 would be the most reliable and,
if necessary, would accommodate multiple approaches throughout assembly.
Specifically, exploiting well-established regioselective coupling
to the 3-position of a 2,3-diolmannoseacceptor[34] would streamline assembly; however, if the selectivity
proved unacceptable or made subsequent analysis too difficult, the
option remained to use 2,3-orthobenzoate formation followed by regioselective
opening to the 2-O-benzoyl leaving the 3-hydroxyl
open as the only possible acceptor. This strategy ultimately proved
successful as it minimized the amount of manipulation of larger intermediate
structures and enabled the development of a standard protocol for
each iterative cycle during assembly. Use of benzyl ethers as stable
protecting groups for the C-4 and C-7 hydroxyls and benzyl protecting
groups for the linker nitrogen would set the stage for a final global
deprotection step.
Figure 2
Retrosynthetic analysis of manno-heptopyranose
capsular antigen target 1. Synthetic strategy to allow
modular assembly of the 1→3 linked 2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose hexasaccharide target
antigen 1.
Retrosynthetic analysis of manno-heptopyranose
capsular antigen target 1. Synthetic strategy to allow
modular assembly of the 1→3 linked 2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose hexasaccharide target
antigen 1.
Building Block Synthesis
The monosaccharide building
blocks 3 and 4 en route to key disaccharide 2 were prepared from a common glycal intermediate 7 (Figure ), which
is available in seven steps from the known mannose derivative 5.[35,36] Elaboration of 7 to the common advanced intermediate 8 was achieved
in seven steps with 65% overall yield by first installing the p-methoxybenzyl (PMB) ether at C-3 followed by osmium-catalyzed
dihydroxylation of the β-face of the glycal. Subsequent acetylation,
selective removal of the anomeric acetate using benzylamine, trichloroacetimidate
formation, installation of the allyl glycoside, and final removal
of the 2-O-acetyl group completed the formation of 8. The stereochemistry of intermediate 8 was
verified using a combination of 1-D and 2-D nuclear magnetic resonance
(NMR) spectroscopy. From 2-D 1H–13C correlation
(HSQC) experiments the H-1 signal was identified as a doublet (3JH1H2 = 7.3 Hz) at 4.31 ppm due
to its correlation to the anomeric 13C signal at 101.73
ppm. From this assignment the ring H-2 H-3 and H-4 ring protons were
easily identified from the COSY spectrum (H-2:3.63 ppm, dd, 3J = 9.1, 7.3 Hz; H-3:3.33 ppm, t, 3J = 9.1 Hz; H-4, 3.53 ppm, t, 3J = 9.1 Hz). Taken together, these coupling constants are consistent
with an all-trans-equatorial pyranose ring, i.e.,
β-gluco configured. With the structure of 8 firmly established and material available in significant
quantity, it was split and transformed in parallel to monosaccharides 3 and 4 as follows. Benzoylation at C-2 of intermediate 8 using benzoyl chloride in pyridine in the presence of DMAP
followed by cerium(IV) ammonium nitrate-mediated cleavage of the 3-O-PMB ether gave 3 in 96% overall yield. In
parallel, donor 4 was produced by installing an ADMBester at C-2 of 8 using ADMB chloride, pyridine, and
DMAP followed by removing the 3-O-PMB ether via cerium(IV)
ammonium nitrate, benzoylation at C-3, and two-step removal of the
anomeric allyl group using Felkin’s catalyst and OsO4 to give the lactol. The lactol was finally transformed into the
trichloroacetimidatedonor 4 by reaction with 2,2,2-trichloroacetonitrile
under catalysis by K2CO3. Coupling of 3 with the donor 4 gave exclusively the β-linked
disaccharide 9 due to the presence of the 2-O-ADMB group, which subsequently was removed in high yield using acetyl
chloride in methanol to give 10. The protecting group
arrangement in 10 was conducive to facile inversion at
C-2 of the nonreducing residue via triflate ester formation followed
by sonication-induced displacement with tetra-n-butylammonium
acetate[37] to give the manno-gluco disaccharide intermediate 11 in 77% yield with no detectable gluco-gluco isomer. Pan removal of the ester protecting groups in 11 gave triol 12, which after 2,3-acetonide and ADMB ester
installation gave 14. Replacement of the 2,3-acetonide
with acetate esters gave the key disaccharide 2, which
provided a convenient point for storing material for future assembly
operations, and may be elaborated conveniently to either a modular
donor or acceptor. In preparation for iterative assembly, two-step
cleavage of the allyl glycoside and reaction of the resulting hemiacetal
with trichloroacetonitrile gave the key disaccharidedonor 17, also a stable intermediate that could be stored in the freezer
for months.
Figure 3
Synthesis of disaccharide donor 17.Chemical manipulations
involved in the preparation of the monosaccharide building blocks 3 and 4 and their coupling to create precursor
compound 9 ready for further elaboration to the disaccharide
donor 17. Reagents and conditions: (a) 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethylbutanoyl
chloride, pyridine, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, 80 °C, 12 h, 81%;
(b) cerium(IV) ammonium nitrate, acetonitrile:H2O (9:1v/v),
5 °C, 10 min; (c) benzoyl chloride, pyridine, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine,
rt, 12 h, 96%, steps p–q overall; (d) Felkin’s catalyst,
tetrahydrofuran, rt, 30 min; (e) OsO4, 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide, rt, 12 h, 91% steps r–s overall; (f) K2CO3 powder (−325 mesh), trichloroacetonitrile,
rt, 12 h; (g) trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate 0.1 equiv,
CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h, 95%; (h) acetyl chloride, methanol,
CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 12 h, 89%; (i) pyridine,
CH2Cl2, trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride,
0 °C, 5 min; (j) tetrabutylammonium acetate, toluene, sonication,
rt, 30 min, steps c–d 90% overall; (k) sodium methoxide, methanol,
tetrahydrofuran, rt, 12 h; (l) p-toluenesulfonic
acid, acetone, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, rt, 30 min; (m) acetic acid,
H2O (4:1, v/v), 65 °C, 1 h; (n) acetic anhydride,
pyridine, CH2Cl2, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine,
rt, 12 h, 65% steps e–i overall. For complete reaction conditions,
see Supporting Information. Bn = Benzyl;
Bz = Benzoyl; All = Allyl; Ac = acetyl; TCA = trichloroacetimidate;
ADMB = 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethyl butanoyl.
Synthesis of disaccharidedonor 17.Chemical manipulations
involved in the preparation of the monosaccharide building blocks 3 and 4 and their coupling to create precursor
compound 9 ready for further elaboration to the disaccharidedonor 17. Reagents and conditions: (a) 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethylbutanoyl
chloride, pyridine, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, 80 °C, 12 h, 81%;
(b) cerium(IV) ammonium nitrate, acetonitrile:H2O (9:1v/v),
5 °C, 10 min; (c) benzoyl chloride, pyridine, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine,
rt, 12 h, 96%, steps p–q overall; (d) Felkin’s catalyst,
tetrahydrofuran, rt, 30 min; (e) OsO4, 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide, rt, 12 h, 91% steps r–s overall; (f) K2CO3 powder (−325 mesh), trichloroacetonitrile,
rt, 12 h; (g) trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate 0.1 equiv,
CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h, 95%; (h) acetyl chloride, methanol,
CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 12 h, 89%; (i) pyridine,
CH2Cl2, trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride,
0 °C, 5 min; (j) tetrabutylammonium acetate, toluene, sonication,
rt, 30 min, steps c–d 90% overall; (k) sodium methoxide, methanol,
tetrahydrofuran, rt, 12 h; (l) p-toluenesulfonic
acid, acetone, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, rt, 30 min; (m) acetic acid,
H2O (4:1, v/v), 65 °C, 1 h; (n) acetic anhydride,
pyridine, CH2Cl2, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine,
rt, 12 h, 65% steps e–i overall. For complete reaction conditions,
see Supporting Information. Bn = Benzyl;
Bz = Benzoyl; All = Allyl; Ac = acetyl; TCA = trichloroacetimidate;
ADMB = 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethyl butanoyl.
Assembly to Protected Hexasaccharide
Assembly of the
hexasaccharide backbone was achieved via three iterative multistep
coupling cycles starting with installation of a masked amine linker
synthon at the reducing end of the saccharide backbone (Figure ). Trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate
(TMSOTf)-mediated coupling of 17 with the protected linker
acceptor 18(38) gave the desired
β-anomer 19 in 87% yield. Sodium methoxide catalyzed
removal of the three ester groups in 19 gave triol 20, the 2,3-cis-diol of which was protected
by an acetonide ketal to give alcohol 21. With the C-2alcohol group of the gluco-residue now isolated,
inversion to the manno-configuration was achieved
through a two-step process involving oxidation to the ketone using
Dess-Martin periodinane[39] followed by reduction
of the crude ketone using NaBH4. The reduction proceeded
cleanly in less than 5 min with 9:1 stereoselectivity in favor of
the desired manno-manno configured
disaccharide 22. While 22 was separable
from the manno-gluco disaccharide 21 at this stage, which presented an opportunity to recycle
recovered 21, it was found that for subsequent larger
runs the mixture could be carried through the next two steps without
impact on yield or quality
of the product. Thus, the 1:9 mixture of 21:22 was benzoylated at the C-2 and after removal of the acetonide gave
diol 23 in 55% overall five-step yield from 20. The structure of 23 was established by a combination
of 1-D and 2-D NMR spectroscopy with a particular focus on on two
properties: (i) the 1JC1,H1 coupling constant, and (ii) the downfield broad singlet signals
corresponding to the C-2 ring protons of β-manno anomeric linkages. These signals would prove diagnostic for determining
the stereochemistry of the anomeric linkages during assembly of larger
oligosaccharides. In the case of 23 the 1JC1,H1 for the two anomeric carbons were 155.2
and 157.8 Hz, indicative of β-linked d-pyranoses.[40] To provide further support of the structural
assignment of 23, a sample of the manno-gluco isomer 21 was treated with benzoyl chloride then acetic
acid to give an authentic sample of diol 24, NMR analysis
of which showed the expected downfield triplet (ppm, 3J = Hz) for the C-2 ring proton consistent with a β-gluco configuration. Coupling of disaccharide diolacceptor 23 with disaccharidedonor 17 at −20 °C
resulted in tetrasaccharide alcohol 25 in 86% yield (Figure ). After benzoylation
of the remaining C-2 hydroxyl, the tetrasaccharide 26 was prepared for inversion of the lone gluco-residue
to the desired manno isomer. In contrast to the disaccharide 19 which could accommodate removal of all esters en route
to isolating the gluco C-2 hydroxyl, the presence of the benzoyl esters
in 26 precluded the use of standard sodium methoxide
de-esterification conditions. However, others have demonstrated selective
removal of acetyl esters in the presence of benzoyl esters using magnesium
methoxide.[41,42] Indeed, treatment of 26 with magnesium methoxide smoothly removed the acetyl esters including
the acetyl ester of the ADMB group, which spontaneously lactonized
to give triol 27 in 75% yield. In analogy with triol 20, triol 27 was subjected to the same process
of acetonide installation, Dess-Martin oxidation, sodium borohydride
reduction, benzoylation, and acetonide removal to give diol 30 in 43% overall five-step yield from triol 27.
Figure 4
Initial coupling cycle to attach the first disaccharide to the
linker. Chemical evolutions in the first of the coupling cycles whereby
the disaccharide donor 17 is attached to the linker synthon
to initiate the saccharide backbone. Subsequent elaborations develop
this compound to the acceptor diol 23 ready for coupling
to further disaccharides to extend the chain. Reagents and conditions:
(a) TMSOTf 0.1 equiv, CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h; (b) sodium
methoxide, methanol, tetrahydrofuran, rt; (c) p-toluenesulfonic
acid, acetone, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, rt, 2 h; (d) Dess-Martin Reagent,
CH2Cl2 (wet), rt, 24 h; (e) dichloromethane:methanol
(1:1), 0 °C, NaBH4, 5 min; (f) benzoyl chloride, pyridine,
CH2Cl2, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, rt, 12 h;
(g) acetic acid, H2O (4:1, v/v), 50 °C, 12 h. For
complete reaction conditions see Supporting Information. Bn = Benzyl; Bz = Benzoyl; Ac = acetyl; TCA = trichloroacetimidate;
ADMB = 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethyl butanoyl; Cbz = benzyloxycarbonyl.
Figure 5
Iterative coupling cycles to assemble the target
hexasaccharide 1. Chemical manipulations involved in
the second and third
coupling cycles installing the disaccharide donor 17 onto
the disaccharide diol acceptor 23 and subsequently the
tetrasaccharide diol acceptor 30 to generate the full-length
hexasaccharide. Succeeding elaborations replace the six 2-O-benzoyl esters with acetyl esters to give hexa-O-acetyl hexasaccharide ready for final deprotection to
give the target antigen 1. Reagents and conditions: (a)
TMSOTf 0.1 equiv, CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h; (b) magnesium
methoxide, methanol, tetrahydrofuran, rt; (c) p-toluenesulfonic
acid, acetone, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, rt, 2 h; (d) Dess-Martin Reagent,
CH2Cl2 (wet), rt, 24 h; (e) dichloromethane:methanol
(1:1), 0 °C, NaBH4, 5 min; (f) benzoyl chloride, pyridine,
CH2Cl2, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, rt, 12 h;
(g) acetic acid, H2O (4:1, v/v), 50 °C, 12 h; (h)
trimethylorthobenzoate, CH2Cl2, CH3CN, cat. camphorsulfonic acid, rt, 1 h, then H2O, 5 h;
(i) ytterbium(III) trifluoromethanesulfonate, p-methoxybenzyl
trichloroacetimidate, toluene, rt, 3 h; (j) NaOMe, methanol, tetrahydrofuran,
rt, 12 h; (k) acetic anhydride, pyridine, CH2Cl2, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, rt, 12 h, 57% over two steps; (l) 10%
Pd/C, methanol, H2O, HCl (1 equiv), H2 (2 atm.),
rt, 43 h, 67%. For complete reaction conditions, see Supporting Information. Bn = Benzyl; Bz = Benzoyl; Ac = acetyl;
ADMB = 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethyl butanoyl; Cbz = benzyloxycarbonyl.
Initial coupling cycle to attach the first disaccharide to the
linker. Chemical evolutions in the first of the coupling cycles whereby
the disaccharidedonor 17 is attached to the linker synthon
to initiate the saccharide backbone. Subsequent elaborations develop
this compound to the acceptor diol 23 ready for coupling
to further disaccharides to extend the chain. Reagents and conditions:
(a) TMSOTf 0.1 equiv, CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h; (b) sodium
methoxide, methanol, tetrahydrofuran, rt; (c) p-toluenesulfonic
acid, acetone, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, rt, 2 h; (d) Dess-Martin Reagent,
CH2Cl2 (wet), rt, 24 h; (e) dichloromethane:methanol
(1:1), 0 °C, NaBH4, 5 min; (f) benzoyl chloride, pyridine,
CH2Cl2, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, rt, 12 h;
(g) acetic acid, H2O (4:1, v/v), 50 °C, 12 h. For
complete reaction conditions see Supporting Information. Bn = Benzyl; Bz = Benzoyl; Ac = acetyl; TCA = trichloroacetimidate;
ADMB = 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethyl butanoyl; Cbz = benzyloxycarbonyl.Iterative coupling cycles to assemble the target
hexasaccharide 1. Chemical manipulations involved in
the second and third
coupling cycles installing the disaccharidedonor 17 onto
the disaccharide diolacceptor 23 and subsequently the
tetrasaccharide diolacceptor 30 to generate the full-length
hexasaccharide. Succeeding elaborations replace the six 2-O-benzoyl esters with acetyl esters to give hexa-O-acetyl hexasaccharide ready for final deprotection to
give the target antigen 1. Reagents and conditions: (a)
TMSOTf 0.1 equiv, CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h; (b) magnesium
methoxide, methanol, tetrahydrofuran, rt; (c) p-toluenesulfonic
acid, acetone, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, rt, 2 h; (d) Dess-Martin Reagent,
CH2Cl2 (wet), rt, 24 h; (e) dichloromethane:methanol
(1:1), 0 °C, NaBH4, 5 min; (f) benzoyl chloride, pyridine,
CH2Cl2, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, rt, 12 h;
(g) acetic acid, H2O (4:1, v/v), 50 °C, 12 h; (h)
trimethylorthobenzoate, CH2Cl2, CH3CN, cat. camphorsulfonic acid, rt, 1 h, then H2O, 5 h;
(i) ytterbium(III) trifluoromethanesulfonate, p-methoxybenzyltrichloroacetimidate, toluene, rt, 3 h; (j) NaOMe, methanol, tetrahydrofuran,
rt, 12 h; (k) acetic anhydride, pyridine, CH2Cl2, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, rt, 12 h, 57% over two steps; (l) 10%
Pd/C, methanol, H2O, HCl (1 equiv), H2 (2 atm.),
rt, 43 h, 67%. For complete reaction conditions, see Supporting Information. Bn = Benzyl; Bz = Benzoyl; Ac = acetyl;
ADMB = 4-acetoxy-2,2-dimethyl butanoyl; Cbz = benzyloxycarbonyl.For the final iteration, coupling
of disaccharidedonor 17 with diolacceptor 30 at −20 °C gave hexasaccharide 31 in 50%
direct yield along with recovery of 40% unreacted
diol 30, which was easily separated chromatographically
and recycled (Figure ). Following the procedures used at the tetrasaccharide level, hexasaccharide 31 was subjected to the same seven-step sequence to achieve
inversion at C-2 of the lone gluco-isomer to afford
the hexasaccharidediol 32 in 31% overall yield from 31. While hexasaccharide 32 could have been extended
further to the octasaccharide, and indeed a small amount of a protected
octasaccharide was produced, minor amounts of partially debenzoylated
byproducts were observed during the sequence from 31 to 32, indicating the upper limit of the utility of this modular
approach was being approached. The last hurdle prior to the deblock
sequence was to differentiate the nonreducing end 2,3-cis-diol to allow for future regioselective incorporation of the 2-O-acetyl group. For this, the well-established approach
of 2,3-ortho-ester formation followed by in situ dilute acid-catalyzed
axial-selective ring opening to give the C-2ester was adapted.[43,44] Thus, treatment of cis-diol 32 with
trimethyl orthobenzoate gave the orthoester which was rearranged selectively
to the C-2ester by addition of water to the reaction mixture. Finally,
the sole remaining hydroxyl group at C-3 of the nonreducing end residue
was benzylated under acidic conditions using benzyl 2,2,2-trichloroacetimidate[45] to give hexasaccharide 33. With
hexasaccharide 33 in hand, the complete β-manno-heptose backbone was in place and all C-2 hydroxyl
groups were differentiated and staged for future incorporation of
the 2-O-acetyl groups.
Final Elaboration and Deprotection
Final processing
and deprotection of 33 to synthetic antigen 1 was accomplished using a simple three-step sequence (Figure ). The six 2-O-benzoyl esters were removed and replaced with acetyl esters to give
hexa-O-acetyl product 34 in 57% yield.
The benzylic protecting groups were removed en masse within 24 h by
hydrogenolysis (2 atm H2) catalyzed by 10% Pd on carbon
in a solution of THF:H2O (2:1 v/v) with 1 equiv of HCl
added to suppress O- to N-acetyl
migration to give the desired SHCPS 1 in 65% after purification
by size exclusion chromatography and lyophilization. No O- to N-acetyl migration was detected, nor was any
2- to 3-O-acetyl migration detected on the nonreducing
end. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry
(MALDI-MS) of SHCPS 1 (Figure , panel A) identified major peaks at m/z = 1427 and m/z = 1449 (calculated values: C60H99NO37m/z = 1426.6; C60H99NO37Na m/z = 1448.6). The 13C NMR and 1H NMR
spectra of the synthetic antigen 1 (Figure , panels B and C) were consistent
with this molecule being 1→3 linked 2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose, which gave confidence
to proceed with conjugation and immunogenicity studies.
Figure 6
Analysis of SHCPS target antigen 1 and
TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate. (A) MALDI-MS of SHCPS target antigen 1. (B) 1H NMR
spectrum of SHCPS target antigen 1. 1H NMR spectra were acquired in D2O with the HOD signal
at 4.75 ppm serving as the internal reference. (C) 13C
NMR spectrum of SHCPS target antigen 1 with
1,4-dioxane (67.19 ppm) served as the internal standard. (D) MALDI-MS
revealing 12 discrete peaks reflecting the incorporation of between
1 and 12 SHCPS hexasaccharides per TetHc protein
as indicated above each peak. Unconjugated TetHc would be present
as a peak at approximately m/z 53 000
as indicated. The increments match the expected mass of the hexasaccharide
and linker following incorporation using the selected chemistry (1524
Da per hexasaccharide incorporated). (E) SDS-PAGE with subsequent
Coomassie staining demonstrates the increased molecular weight of
the TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate compared to unconjugated
TetHc protein. No unconjugated TetHc was visible in the
glycoconjugate. Loading was with 3.2 μg of TetHc per
lane and 3.4 μg and 6.8 μg of conjugate in the left and
right lanes respectively.
Analysis of SHCPS target antigen 1 and
TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate. (A) MALDI-MS of SHCPS target antigen 1. (B) 1H NMR
spectrum of SHCPS target antigen 1. 1H NMR spectra were acquired in D2O with the HOD signal
at 4.75 ppm serving as the internal reference. (C) 13C
NMR spectrum of SHCPS target antigen 1 with
1,4-dioxane (67.19 ppm) served as the internal standard. (D) MALDI-MS
revealing 12 discrete peaks reflecting the incorporation of between
1 and 12 SHCPShexasaccharides per TetHc protein
as indicated above each peak. Unconjugated TetHc would be present
as a peak at approximately m/z 53 000
as indicated. The increments match the expected mass of the hexasaccharide
and linker following incorporation using the selected chemistry (1524
Da per hexasaccharide incorporated). (E) SDS-PAGE with subsequent
Coomassie staining demonstrates the increased molecular weight of
the TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate compared to unconjugated
TetHc protein. No unconjugated TetHc was visible in the
glycoconjugate. Loading was with 3.2 μg of TetHc per
lane and 3.4 μg and 6.8 μg of conjugate in the left and
right lanes respectively.
Conjugation to Carrier Protein
Although SHCPS 1 was likely to be of sufficient size to act as
an epitope to generate specific antibodies, it was considered to be
unlikely to be sufficiently immunogenic on its own to stimulate antibodies
during immunization. Polysaccharides such as the manno-heptopyranoseCPS are generally T-independent type 2 antigens relying
on cross-linking of surface immunoglobulin molecules present on antigen-specific
B cells to stimulate antibody responses.[46−48] With a molecular
weight of 1524 Da, SHCPS 1 is not large enough
to act in this manner, and further its small size makes rapid clearance
from the body before engaging with the immune system a real possibility.
For larger polysaccharides, conjugation to carrier proteins is the
traditional method to allow polysaccharides to act as T-dependent
antigens with the concomitant boost in antibody responses, promotion
of class switching and increased B-cell memory formation.[49] Additional benefits of this strategy for oligosaccharides
such as synthetic hexasaccharide 1 are that clustering
of multiple oligosaccharides on a single protein may act to simulate
a larger polysaccharide, and that the resulting glycoconjugate may
be retained for longer in the body giving more time to engage with
and stimulate the immune system. As such, SHCPS was designed
to incorporate an amine-terminated alkyl linker to allow conjugation
to a carrier protein. The recombinant carrier protein was the nontoxic
Hc domain of tetanus toxin (TetHc), primarily chosen due
to the presence of known T-cell epitopes and because tetanus toxoid
is used as the carrier in a number of licensed glycoconjugate vaccines.[50] Conjugation was effected by linking hexasaccharide 1 to TetHc using a glutaric acid linker as described
by Bromuro et al.[51] The glycoconjugate
was purified by size exclusion centrifugation and lyophilized. The
resulting glycoconjugate (TetHc-SHCPS) was present
as a slightly diffuse band with reduced mobility by SDS-PAGE compared
to unconjugated TetHc, indicating the incorporation of
glycan. The MALDI-MS data for the conjugate clearly show successive
signals at Δ = 1524 amu, attributable to increasing valency
of the fully intact hexasaccharide plus the glutarate linker. While
2-O to 3-O-Ac migration at the nonreducing
terminal residue cannot be unequivocally ruled out, all of the Acesters in the hexasaccharide antigen are present (Figure , panels D and E). It was possible
to see 12 discrete peaks arranged in a generally normal distribution
with a mean of approximately 6.5 hexamers per TetHc protein
(15% glycan by weight), which was consistent with the degree of reduced
mobility by SDS-PAGE. No unconjugated TetHc was visible
by mass spectrometry or by SDS-PAGE.
Conjugate Immunogenicity
To assess whether the synthetic
hexasaccharide was capable of raising relevant immune responses, groups
of five BALB/c mice were immunized using a prime-boost-boost strategy
with the TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate or a mix
of unconjugated SHCPS and TetHc. Following the
final boost, sera was recovered from tail veins and titers of IgG
and IgM recognizing purified native CPS were determined by ELISA (Table ). Mice receiving
the mix of SHCPS and TetHc had a CPS-specific
antibody titer which was below the limit of detection in this assay.
In contrast, all of the mice receiving the TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate had detectable levels of IgG and IgM recognizing
native CPS, demonstrating that the synthetic approach utilized here
successfully generated immunologically relevant glycoconjugates and
also the necessity for conjugation to a carrier protein for the development
of detectable immune responses. There was a bias toward IgG in the
responses of four of the five mice immunized with TetHc-SHCPS, as is consistent with responses observed for other
glycoconjugate vaccines where there is expected to be a switch from
IgM to IgG production. Interestingly, the titer of the CPS-specific
IgG response to this glycoconjugate (reciprocal end point titer of
25–400) is several orders of magnitude lower than what has
previously been observed for responses generated against native CPS
conjugates (reciprocal end point titer of ∼100 000[17,18]). The reason for this disparity is unclear at present, although
one hypothesis currently being evaluated involves the relative abundance
within the native and synthetic CPS molecules of the repeating internal
epitope (present in great excess in native CPS) and the terminal epitope
at the nonreducing end of the glycan (present in relatively greater
abundance in synthetic CPS).. It is possible that antibodies raised
to different parts of the CPS molecule play different roles in protection
of the host, for example, opsonizing antibodies may only be generated
in response to certain epitopes.
Table 1
Antibody Titers versus
Native CPS
Following Immunization with TetHc-SHCPS Glycoconjugate
antibody
reciprocal end point titera
vaccine received
IgM
IgG
IgG:IgM ratio
TetHc - SHCPS conjugateb
25
200
8
50
100
2
50
25
0.5
200
400
2
25
25
1
TetHc/SHCPS mixb
<25
<25
N/A
<25
<25
N/A
<25
<25
N/A
<25
<25
N/A
<25
<25
N/A
The limit of detection for this
assay was a reciprocal end point of 25.
Each row represents the result from
an individual mouse.
The limit of detection for this
assay was a reciprocal end point of 25.Each row represents the result from
an individual mouse.
Protective
Efficacy
Murine models of melioidosis using
BALB/c mice and the intraperitoneal route of infection are well established
and have been used extensively to evaluate vaccine candidates (for
reviews, see refs (8−10,52,53)). The protective efficacy of
the TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate was assessed
in two independent challenge studies (see Experimental
Procedures section for details of the schedules), starting
with a preliminary study to establish approximate p values and effect size to inform power calculations for confirmatory
studies (groups received; (i) TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate
and (ii) adjuvant only; challenge was 1.02 × 105 colony
forming units (CFU) of B. pseudomallei K96243 (approximately 137 × LD50); n = 6 per group). The results from the preliminary study were such
that a similarly sized study was sufficient to verify the findings.
Additional groups were included in this study to further examine the
protection observed (groups received; (i) TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate; (ii) adjuvant only; (iii) a mix of unconjugated SHCPS and TetHc protein; and (iv) SHCPS
only; challenge was with 8.9 × 104 CFU of B. pseudomallei K996243 (approximately 120 ×
LD50); n = 6 per group). The survival
curves of the groups receiving adjuvant only or the TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate were examined to assess consistency
between the two studies and were not significantly different (p = 0.1380 and p = 0.3112, respectively).
Therefore, further analysis was conducted using pooled data sets (Figure ).
Figure 7
Protective efficacy of
TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate. (A) Kaplan–Meier
plot displaying survival of immunized BALB/c mice over 35 days following
intraperitoneal infection with 120 to 137 × LD50 of B. pseudomallei strain K96243. (B) Data table detailing
significance after analyzing the survival data using a Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox)
test. The TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate offers
significantly better protection than all the other vaccines tested.
Median survival time and clearance in surviving mice is indicated.
Protective efficacy of
TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate. (A) Kaplan–Meier
plot displaying survival of immunized BALB/c mice over 35 days following
intraperitoneal infection with 120 to 137 × LD50 of B. pseudomallei strain K96243. (B) Data table detailing
significance after analyzing the survival data using a Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox)
test. The TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate offers
significantly better protection than all the other vaccines tested.
Median survival time and clearance in surviving mice is indicated.As expected and in line with the
high challenge doses used in these
studies (≥120 × LD50), all control mice immunized
with adjuvant succumbed rapidly to disease, with 11 of 12 mice succumbing
within 3 days. In contrast, only 4 of the 12 mice immunized with TetHc-SHCPS had succumbed to disease by the end of the
study at day 35. Of the surviving eight mice, no bacteria were detectable
in the lungs, liver, and spleen of three, suggesting, at least within
the confines of the organs tested and the limit of detection of the
assay, that these mice had cleared infection. The remaining five mice
had bacteria detectable in the liver and spleen (2 of 5 mice) or in
lungs, liver, and spleen (3 of 5 mice). The highest numbers of bacteria
were present in the spleen (median 2.7 × 106 CFU,
range 2.0 × 104 CFU to 3.2 × 107 CFU)
with lower levels in the lungs (median 2.3 × 102 CFU,
range 8.0 × 100 CFU to 2.5 × 103 CFU)
and liver (median 3.3 × 103 CFU, range 4.0 ×
101 CFU to 6.6 × 104 CFU) suggesting an
ongoing infection with the mice likely to succumb to infection without
further medical intervention. Such a high level of survival, and indeed
the presence of apparent bacterial clearance in a subset of mice,
was unexpected given the very low level of antigen-specific antibodies
detectable after immunization. Previous studies have undoubtedly indicated
the need for humoral immunity in vaccine-induced protection (for reviews,
see refs (8−10)), and although there have only
been limited studies where antibody titers have been directly linked
to outcome on an individual animal basis,[54] it is clear from other studies using conjugated and unconjugated
native capsular polysaccharide that groups with higher antigen-specific
antibody titers fare better than groups with lower titers. Previous
work has identified differences between the immunogenicity of terminal
and internal polysaccharide epitopes in model antigens[55] and some evidence exists with Francisella tularensis that the avidity of antibodies
targeting terminal epitopes can be higher than for antibodies targeting
internal epitopes.[56] It may be that, although
stimulating a relatively low titer of antibody, the small size and
different spectrum of epitopes within SHCPS promotes development
of highly functional antibodies responsible for the high levels of
protection observed. This possibility, and methods to exploit it for
improved vaccines, is currently under study.In summary, this
is the first demonstration of the chemical synthesis
of an immunologically relevant and protective hexasaccharide fragment
of the capsular polysaccharide of B. pseudomallei and serves as the rational starting point for the development of
an effective licensed vaccine for this emerging infectious disease.
The synthetic B. pseudomalleiCPS hexamer
material lacks impurities such as endotoxin, and is generated with
limited batch-to-batch variation and high quality control standards
which are intrinsic to process manufacturing. In addition, the ability
to install a functional amine for directed conjugation, and the lack
of requirement for containment facilities renders this approach to
accessing CPS antigen as a suitable starting point for industrial
process development toward licensure. Further, the modular disaccharide
strategy described herein is broadly applicable for synthesizing other
glycans containing C-6 homologated monosaccharide units in general,
and for those connected by 1,2-β-manno-configured
glycosides in particular.
Experimental Procedures
Chemical
Synthesis
Detailed synthetic procedures and
characterization data are available online; see Supporting Information.
Glycoconjugate Generation
and Analysis
Recombinant
tetanus toxin Hc fragment (TetHc; incorporating
amino acids 865–1315 from TetX (NP_783831) of Clostridium tetani E88) was purified from E. coli BL21 (pKS1-TetHc) using the method
of Sinha et al.[57] with modifications as
previously described.[58] The TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate was manufactured by linking SHCPS to TetHc protein using the method of Bromuro
et al.[51] Briefly, hexasaccharide antigen
(1) (3.0 mg, 4.3 μmol) was dissolved in H2O (100 μL) and DMSO (900 μL) was added followed by triethylamine
(5 μL). Solid disuccinyl glutarate (DSG) was added and the suspension
was vortexed until a clear solution resulted (10 s). The solution
was incubated at room temperature for 2 h then the reaction solution
was applied directly to the top of a Sephadex G-10 column (2.5 cm
diameter × 14 cm height) that had been pre-equilibrated with
pH 4 water. The column was eluted by gravity with pH 4 water. 4 mL
fractions were collected and analyzed by TLC for carbohydrate content
(anisaldehyde staining). Carbohydrate-containing fractions were combined
and concentrated to dryness, then reconstituted in 10 mM phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS, pH 7.0, 1000 μL). This solution was added to a
solution of TetHc protein (3.08 mg) in 10 mM PBS (1000
μL) and the reaction solution was incubated for 9.5 h at 4 °C.
The conjugate was purified by repeated centrifugation through a 10
kDa MWCO Amicon filter until no carbohydrate (free antigen) could
be detected in the filtrate (6 × 3 mL, 10 mM PBS, pH 7.0). The
concentrate containing the conjugate was lyophilized and reconstituted
in water then sampled for analysis by SDS-PAGE and MALDI-MS. Absolute
protein content was determined using a modified Bradford assay (Bio-Rad)
using unconjugated TetHc as a reference standard.
Ethics Statement
Investigations involving animals were
carried out according to the requirements of the UK Animal (Scientific
Procedures) Act 1986 under project licenses PPL 30/2623 and PPL 30/3026.
These project licenses were approved following an ethical review by
Dstl’s Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body.
Animal Immunization
and Infection
Please see Supporting Information for detailed information
on animal care and housing. Studies were performed using female BALB/cAnNCrl
mice (BALB/c; Charles River UK). Mice were immunized via the intraperitoneal
route on days 0, 14, and 28 with the various antigens. The mice received
66 μg of TetHc-SHCPS glycoconjugate per
dose (containing 10 μg of SHCPS and 56 μg of
TetHc) or matching amounts of unconjugated antigen as appropriate.
All antigens were formulated in adjuvant containing monophosphoryl
lipid A from Salmonella minnesota (25
μg per mouse per dose) and synthetic trehalose dicorynomycolate
(25 μg per mouse per dose) as an oil-in-water emulsion of 2%
squalene and 0.2% Tween 80 (Sigma Adjuvant System, Sigma-Aldrich).
Antigen and adjuvant were combined and vortexed thoroughly to mix
immediately before administration to mice. Challenges with B. pseudomallei K96243 were delivered at day 63 via
the intraperitoneal route. The B. pseudomallei K96243 used in this study was a low passage descendant of the original
stock from which genomic DNA was prepared and sequenced by Holden
et al.[59] Prior to use in this study, this
stock of strain K96243 was verified as being sequence type 10 using
the multilocus sequence typing scheme of Godoy et al.[60] To prepare challenge material, B. pseudomallei K96243 was inoculated from a glycerol stock into 100 mL L-broth
and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with shaking (180 rpm). The OD590 was adjusted to 0.4 (corresponding to approximately 4 ×
108 CFU/mL) and diluted in L-broth to the desired concentration
for challenge. For organ bacterial enumeration at the end of study,
animals were culled and organs removed. These were mashed through
40 μm sieves into PBS, serially diluted, and plated onto L-agar.
Analysis of Antibody Responses
Approximately 0.1 mL
of blood was collected from the tail veins of mice 14 days after the
final immunizations were performed and serum was removed and stored
at −20 °C until required. Responses directed against native
CPS antigen were assessed by ELISA essentially as previously described[17] using native CPS purified from B. thailandensis E555::wbiI (pKnock-Km)[61] to coat the ELISA plates. A reading of twice
background or above was considered positive and the titer was determined
to be the reciprocal of the final positive dilution.
Data Analysis
All graphs were produced and analysis
conducted using the program GraphPad PRISM v 6.0. Survival data was
analyzed using a log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Significance was assessed
at the 95% confidence level. ChemBioDraw Ultra v 13.0 was used for
drawing compounds and reaction schemes. GNU Image Manipulation Program
(GIMP) v 2.8 was used to assemble figures into their final format.
Authors: Peter H Seeberger; Regina L Soucy; Yong-Uk Kwon; Daniel A Snyder; Takuya Kanemitsu Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2004-07-09 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Hing-Ken Lee; Christopher N Scanlan; Cheng-Yuan Huang; Aileen Y Chang; Daniel A Calarese; Raymond A Dwek; Pauline M Rudd; Dennis R Burton; Ian A Wilson; Chi-Huey Wong Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2004-02-13 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: B J Currie; D A Fisher; D M Howard; J N Burrow; D Lo; S Selva-Nayagam; N M Anstey; S E Huffam; P L Snelling; P J Marks; D P Stephens; G D Lum; S P Jacups; V L Krause Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2000-10-25 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Michelle Nelson; Joann L Prior; M Stephen Lever; Helen E Jones; Timothy P Atkins; Richard W Titball Journal: J Med Microbiol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.472
Authors: Daniel Godoy; Gaynor Randle; Andrew J Simpson; David M Aanensen; Tyrone L Pitt; Reimi Kinoshita; Brian G Spratt Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Andrew E Scott; Thomas R Laws; Riccardo V D'Elia; Margaret G M Stokes; Tannistha Nandi; E Diane Williamson; Patrick Tan; Joann L Prior; Timothy P Atkins Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2013-05-15
Authors: Elisa Danieli; Daniela Proietti; Giulia Brogioni; Maria R Romano; Emilia Cappelletti; Marta Tontini; Francesco Berti; Luigi Lay; Paolo Costantino; Roberto Adamo Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Direk Limmathurotsakul; David A B Dance; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Mirjam Kaestli; Mark Mayo; Jeffrey Warner; David M Wagner; Apichai Tuanyok; Heiman Wertheim; Tan Yoke Cheng; Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay; Savithiri Puthucheary; Nicholas P J Day; Ivo Steinmetz; Bart J Currie; Sharon J Peacock Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2013-03-21
Authors: Nicole M Bzdyl; Nichollas E Scott; Isobel H Norville; Andrew E Scott; Timothy Atkins; Stanley Pang; Derek S Sarovich; Geoffrey Coombs; Timothy J J Inglis; Charlene M Kahler; Mitali Sarkar-Tyson Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Muhammad Abubakar Sadiq; Latiffah Hassan; Saleha Abdul Aziz; Zunita Zakaria; Hassan Ismail Musa; Maswati Mat Amin Journal: Vet World Date: 2018-10-12
Authors: Marc Bayliss; Matthew I Donaldson; Sergey A Nepogodiev; Giulia Pergolizzi; Andrew E Scott; Nicholas J Harmer; Robert A Field; Joann L Prior Journal: Carbohydr Res Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 2.975