| Literature DB >> 29024844 |
Marc Bayliss1, Matthew I Donaldson2, Sergey A Nepogodiev2, Giulia Pergolizzi2, Andrew E Scott3, Nicholas J Harmer4, Robert A Field5, Joann L Prior6.
Abstract
Burkholderia pseudomallei and its close relative B. mallei are human pathogens that are classified as Tier 1 bio-threat agents. Both organisms have previously been shown to constitutively produce a capsular polysaccharide (CPS) that is both a virulence determinant and protective antigen. Extraction and purification of CPS for use as a potential vaccine candidate requires containment level 3 laboratories which is expensive and time-consuming. B. thailandensis strain E555 is closely related to B. pseudomallei and B. mallei, but is non-pathogenic to humans and based on immunological cross-reactivity has previously been shown to express a B. pseudomallei-like CPS. In this study, capsular polysaccharide isolated from an O-antigen deficient strain of B. thailandensis E555 was identified by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy as -3-)-2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose-(-1, and identical to that produced by B. pseudomallei. This was further substantiated by anti-CPS monoclonal antibody binding. In connection with the production of CPS fragments for use in glycoconjugate vaccines, we set out to assess the importance or otherwise of the CPS 2-OAc groups in immune protection. To this end conjugates of the native and de-O-acetylated CPS with the Hc fragment of tetanus toxin (TetHc) were used as vaccines in a mouse model of melioidosis. The level of protection provided by deacetylated CPS was significantly lower than that from native, acetylated CPS. In addition, sera from mice vaccinated with the deacetylated CPS conjugate did not recognise native CPS. This suggests that CPS extracted from B. thailandensis can be used as antigen and that the acetyl group is essential for protection. CrownEntities:
Keywords: Burkholderia pseudomallei; Burkholderia thailandensis; Capsular polysaccharide; Glycoconjugate vaccine; Melioidosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29024844 PMCID: PMC5697523 DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2017.09.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Carbohydr Res ISSN: 0008-6215 Impact factor: 2.975
Fig. 1Carbohydrate regions of 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, D2O, 25 °C) of CPS isolated from (A) B. pseudomallei 1026b, (B) B. thailandensis E555:: wbiI (pKnock-KmR), and (C) deacetylated CPS from B. thailandensis E555. Signals of α-1,3-mannan present in CPS spectra are is indicated by asterisks. Spectra of native CPS are recorded using water suppression experiment.
Fig. 2Monosaccharide analysis of B. thailandensis E555:: wbiI (pKnock-KmR) CPS by HPAE-PAD on Dionex Carbopac PA 20 column. The bottom trace shows the ion chromatogram of CPC hydrolysis products and the top one is the same sample spiked with 25 μM 6-deoxy-d-manno-heptose standard. Peaks correspond to (A) – unidentified sugar, (B)-6-deoxy-d-manno-heptose, and (C) – mannose. The analysis was performed on Dionex Carbopac PA 20 column (3 × 150 mm) at 0.25 mL/min in 8 mM NaOH at 25 °C.
Fig. 3Survival of BALB/c mice vaccinated with CPS-TetHc (acetylated and deacetylated CPS), TetHc and alum followed by challenge with 1.17 × 105 CFU via the IP route of B. pseudomallei K96243 (approximately 157 x median lethal doses (MLDs)). Mice were vaccinated three times in two-week intervals prior to challenge. Vaccination with acetylated CPS conjugate offered significantly greater protection than the deacetylated CPS conjugate [p = 0.0015 Log-Rank (Mantel Cox test [35])]. The deacetylated CPS-TetHc conjugate did not offer any significantly greater protection than adjuvant or TetHc alone [p = 0.1694 and p = 0.0872 Log-Rank, respectively (Mantel Cox test)].
Fig. 4ELISA analysis of acetylated and deacetylated CPS-specific IgG and IgM immune responses following vaccination with CPS conjugate vaccines. Mice were vaccinated with native CPS-TetHc or deacetylated CPS-TetHc three times at 2-week intervals. Serum was obtained from mice 14 days after the third vaccination, and titres of IgG and IgM specific for CPS or deacetylated CPS were determined by ELISA. Individual symbols represent a single immunised mouse. Significance was determined by unpaired t-test. LOD, limit of detection.