Literature DB >> 27122039

The Neural Feedback Response to Error As a Teaching Signal for the Motor Learning System.

Scott T Albert1, Reza Shadmehr2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: When we experience an error during a movement, we update our motor commands to partially correct for this error on the next trial. How does experience of error produce the improvement in the subsequent motor commands? During the course of an erroneous reaching movement, proprioceptive and visual sensory pathways not only sense the error, but also engage feedback mechanisms, resulting in corrective motor responses that continue until the hand arrives at its goal. One possibility is that this feedback response is co-opted by the learning system and used as a template to improve performance on the next attempt. Here we used electromyography (EMG) to compare neural correlates of learning and feedback to test the hypothesis that the feedback response to error acts as a template for learning. We designed a task in which mixtures of error-clamp and force-field perturbation trials were used to deconstruct EMG time courses into error-feedback and learning components. We observed that the error-feedback response was composed of excitation of some muscles, and inhibition of others, producing a complex activation/deactivation pattern during the reach. Despite this complexity, across muscles the learning response was consistently a scaled version of the error-feedback response, but shifted 125 ms earlier in time. Across people, individuals who produced a greater feedback response to error, also learned more from error. This suggests that the feedback response to error serves as a teaching signal for the brain. Individuals who learn faster have a better teacher in their feedback control system. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our sensory organs transduce errors in behavior. To improve performance, we must generate better motor commands. How does the nervous system transform an error in sensory coordinates into better motor commands in muscle coordinates? Here we show that when an error occurs during a movement, the reflexes transform the sensory representation of error into motor commands. To learn from error, the nervous system scales this feedback response and then shifts it earlier in time, adding it to the previously generated motor commands. This addition serves as an update to the motor commands, constituting the learning signal. Therefore, by providing a coordinate transformation, the feedback system generates a template for learning from error.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/364832-14$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  error-feedback response; motor control; motor learning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27122039      PMCID: PMC4846676          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0159-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  18 in total

1.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.

Authors:  R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer; M A Conditt; W Z Rymer; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG.

Authors:  Rieko Osu; David W Franklin; Hiroko Kato; Hiroaki Gomi; Kazuhisa Domen; Toshinori Yoshioka; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The nervous system uses nonspecific motor learning in response to random perturbations of varying nature.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Daniel Wert; Konrad Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Adrian Haith; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance.

Authors:  E Burdet; R Osu; D W Franklin; T E Milner; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Yohsuke R Miyamoto; Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Bence P Ölveczky; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Preparing to reach: selecting an adaptive long-latency feedback controller.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Farzad Towhidkhah; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement.

Authors:  M Kawato; K Furukawa; R Suzuki
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  CNS learns stable, accurate, and efficient movements using a simple algorithm.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Etienne Burdet; Keng Peng Tee; Rieko Osu; Chee-Meng Chew; Theodore E Milner; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; John Houde
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Both fast and slow learning processes contribute to savings following sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Susan K Coltman; Joshua G A Cashaback; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Somatosensory Cortex Plays an Essential Role in Forelimb Motor Adaptation in Mice.

Authors:  Mackenzie Weygandt Mathis; Alexander Mathis; Naoshige Uchida
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Trial-by-Trial Motor Cortical Correlates of a Rapidly Adapting Visuomotor Internal Model.

Authors:  Sergey D Stavisky; Jonathan C Kao; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Learning to Predict and Control the Physics of Our Movements.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Different adaptation rates to abrupt and gradual changes in environmental dynamics.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner; Zeinab Firouzimehr; Saeed Babadi; David J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Divisively Normalized Integration of Multisensory Error Information Develops Motor Memories Specific to Vision and Proprioception.

Authors:  Takuji Hayashi; Yutaro Kato; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Keeping still doesn't "make sense": examining a role for movement variability by stabilizing the arm during a postural control task.

Authors:  Chantelle D Murnaghan; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The perceptual shaping of anticipatory actions.

Authors:  Giovanni Maffei; Ivan Herreros; Marti Sanchez-Fibla; Karl J Friston; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.