Literature DB >> 27121660

Rapid fabrication of poly(DL-lactide) nanofiber scaffolds with tunable degradation for tissue engineering applications by air-brushing.

Adam M Behrens1, Jeffrey Kim, Nathan Hotaling, Jonathan E Seppala, Peter Kofinas, Wojtek Tutak.   

Abstract

Polymer nanofiber based materials have been widely investigated for use as tissue engineering scaffolds. While promising, these materials are typically fabricated through techniques that require significant time or cost. Here we report a rapid and cost effective air-brushing method for fabricating nanofiber scaffolds using a simple handheld apparatus, compressed air, and a polymer solution. Air-brushing also facilities control over the scaffold degradation rate without adversely impacting architecture. This was accomplished through a one step blending process of high (M w  ≈  100 000 g mol(-1)) and low (M w  ≈  25 000 g mol(-1)) molecular weight poly(DL-lactide) (PDLLA) polymers at various ratios (100:0, 70:30 and 50:50). Through this approach, we were able to control fiber scaffold degradation rate while maintaining similar fiber morphology, scaffold porosity, and bulk mechanical properties across all of the tested compositions. The impact of altered degradation rates was biologically evaluated in human bone marrow stromal cell (hBMSC) cultures for up to 16 days and demonstrated degradation rate dependence of both total DNA concentration and gene regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27121660      PMCID: PMC4963247          DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/11/3/035001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  25 in total

Review 1.  Control of scaffold degradation in tissue engineering: a review.

Authors:  Hongbo Zhang; Li Zhou; Wenjun Zhang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Travis J Sill; Horst A von Recum
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate.

Authors:  Jung Park; Sebastian Bauer; Klaus von der Mark; Patrik Schmuki
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Identification of distinct topographical surface microstructures favoring either undifferentiated expansion or differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Lotte D'Andrea Markert; Jette Lovmand; Morten Foss; Rune Hoff Lauridsen; Michael Lovmand; Ernst-Martin Füchtbauer; Annette Füchtbauer; Karin Wertz; Flemming Besenbacher; Finn Skou Pedersen; Mogens Duch
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.272

5.  DiameterJ: A validated open source nanofiber diameter measurement tool.

Authors:  Nathan A Hotaling; Kapil Bharti; Haydn Kriel; Carl G Simon
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  The determination of stem cell fate by 3D scaffold structures through the control of cell shape.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Christopher K Tison; Kaushik Chatterjee; P Scott Pine; Jennifer H McDaniel; Marc L Salit; Marian F Young; Carl G Simon
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Control of degradation rate and hydrophilicity in electrospun non-woven poly(D,L-lactide) nanofiber scaffolds for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Kwangsok Kim; Meiki Yu; Xinhua Zong; Jonathan Chiu; Dufei Fang; Young-Soo Seo; Benjamin S Hsiao; Benjamin Chu; Michael Hadjiargyrou
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  The support of bone marrow stromal cell differentiation by airbrushed nanofiber scaffolds.

Authors:  Wojtek Tutak; Sumona Sarkar; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Tanya M Farooque; Giri Jyotsnendu; Dongbo Wang; Joachim Kohn; Durgadas Bolikal; Carl G Simon
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Biodegradable-Polymer-Blend-Based Surgical Sealant with Body-Temperature-Mediated Adhesion.

Authors:  Adam M Behrens; Nora G Lee; Brendan J Casey; Priya Srinivasan; Michael J Sikorski; John L Daristotle; Anthony D Sandler; Peter Kofinas
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 10.  An overview of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Piergiorgio Gentile; Valeria Chiono; Irene Carmagnola; Paul V Hatton
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pressure-Sensitive Tissue Adhesion and Biodegradation of Viscoelastic Polymer Blends.

Authors:  John L Daristotle; Shadden T Zaki; Lung W Lau; Omar B Ayyub; Massi Djouini; Priya Srinivasan; Metecan Erdi; Anthony D Sandler; Peter Kofinas
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 9.229

2.  A Review of the Fundamental Principles and Applications of Solution Blow Spinning.

Authors:  John L Daristotle; Adam M Behrens; Anthony D Sandler; Peter Kofinas
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  A step toward engineering thick tissues: Distributing microfibers within 3D printed frames.

Authors:  Joseph Molde; Joseph A M Steele; Alexandra K Pastino; Anisha Mahat; N Sanjeeva Murthy; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Pneumatospinning Biomimetic Scaffolds for Meniscus Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Erik W Dorthé; Austin B Williams; Shawn P Grogan; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-02

5.  A Non-woven Path: Electrospun Poly(lactic acid) Scaffolds for Kidney Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Todd P Burton; Anthony Callanan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.