Literature DB >> 19508153

Identification of distinct topographical surface microstructures favoring either undifferentiated expansion or differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells.

Lotte D'Andrea Markert1, Jette Lovmand, Morten Foss, Rune Hoff Lauridsen, Michael Lovmand, Ernst-Martin Füchtbauer, Annette Füchtbauer, Karin Wertz, Flemming Besenbacher, Finn Skou Pedersen, Mogens Duch.   

Abstract

The potential of embryonic stem (ES) cells for both self-renewal and differentiation into cells of all three germ layers has generated immense interest in utilizing these cells for tissue engineering or cell-based therapies. However, the ability to culture undifferentiated ES cells without the use of feeder cells as well as means to obtain homogeneous, differentiated cell populations devoid of residual pluripotent ES cells still remain major challenges. Here we have applied murine ES cells to topographically microstructured surface libraries, BioSurface Structure Arrays (BSSA), and investigated whether these could be used to (i) identify topographically microstructured growth supports alleviating the need for feeder cells for expansion of undifferentiated ES cells and (ii) identify specific types of microstructures enforcing differentiation of ES cells. The BSSA surfaces arrays consisted of 504 different topographical microstructures each located in a tester field of 3 x 3 mm. The murine ES cell lines CJ7 and KH2 were seeded upon the BSSA libraries and specific topographical structures facilitating either undifferentiated ES cell growth or enhancing spreading indicative of differentiation of the ES cells were identified. Secondly serial passage of undifferentiated CJ7 ES cells on selected microstructures, identified in the screening of these BSSA libraries, showed that these cells had retained germ-line potential. These results indicate that one specific type of topographical surface microstructures, identified by the BSSA technology, can substitute for feeder cells and that another subset may be used to eliminate undifferentiated ES cells from a population of differentiated ES cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19508153     DOI: 10.1089/scd.2009.0114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  23 in total

1.  An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate.

Authors:  Hemant V Unadkat; Marc Hulsman; Kamiel Cornelissen; Bernke J Papenburg; Roman K Truckenmüller; Anne E Carpenter; Matthias Wessling; Gerhard F Post; Marc Uetz; Marcel J T Reinders; Dimitrios Stamatialis; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Jan de Boer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  High throughput screening to investigate the interaction of stem cells with their extracellular microenvironment.

Authors:  Soneela Ankam; Benjamin K K Teo; Marek Kukumberg; Evelyn K F Yim
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 3.  Biomaterial strategies for stem cell maintenance during in vitro expansion.

Authors:  Xiang-Zhen Yan; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; Sanne K Both; Pi-Shan Yang; John A Jansen; Fang Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Finding the winning combination. Combinatorial screening of three dimensional niches to guide stem cell osteogenesis.

Authors:  Adnan Memic; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Porous membrane substrates offer better niches to enhance the Wnt signaling and promote human embryonic stem cell growth and differentiation.

Authors:  Sha Jin; Huantong Yao; Pantrika Krisanarungson; Andreas Haukas; Kaiming Ye
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Why the impact of mechanical stimuli on stem cells remains a challenge.

Authors:  Roman Goetzke; Antonio Sechi; Laura De Laporte; Sabine Neuss; Wolfgang Wagner
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  Combining topographical and genetic cues to promote neuronal fate specification in stem cells.

Authors:  Erin K Purcell; Youssef Naim; Amy Yang; Michelle K Leach; J Matthew Velkey; R Keith Duncan; Joseph M Corey
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Rapid fabrication of poly(DL-lactide) nanofiber scaffolds with tunable degradation for tissue engineering applications by air-brushing.

Authors:  Adam M Behrens; Jeffrey Kim; Nathan Hotaling; Jonathan E Seppala; Peter Kofinas; Wojtek Tutak
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 9.  Shaping Cell Fate: Influence of Topographical Substratum Properties on Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Sarita Kumari; Steven Vermeulen; Ben van der Veer; Aurélie Carlier; Jan de Boer; Deepa Subramanyam
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 6.389

10.  High-Throughput Mechanobiology Screening Platform Using Micro- and Nanotopography.

Authors:  Junqiang Hu; Alexander A Gondarenko; Alex P Dang; Keenan T Bashour; Roddy S O'Connor; Sunwoo Lee; Anastasia Liapis; Saba Ghassemi; Michael C Milone; Michael P Sheetz; Michael L Dustin; Lance C Kam; James C Hone
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 11.189

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.