Literature DB >> 27121445

Central blood pressure assessment using oscillometry is feasible for everyday clinical practice.

A Reshetnik1, C Gohlisch1, W Zidek1, M Tölle1, M van der Giet1.   

Abstract

The benefit of the central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) has already been recognized, but its general measurement in the everyday routine is still limited mainly because available established non-invasive assessment devices are not suitable for everyday use. In this study, we investigated the performance of an oscillometric device Tel-O-GRAPH for cSBP assessment in terms of suitability for everyday clinical use. One hundred and three patients were prospectively included. cSBP was computed by Tel-O-GRAPH compared with Sphygmocor using applanation tonometry. There was a good agreement between Tel-O-GRAPH and Sphygmocor for cSBP (mean difference±s.d.: -0.3±6.7 mm Hg; Pearson's R=0.95; P<0.0001). Recorded cSBP values in the supine vs seated position and for the experienced vs non-experienced user did not significantly differ (mean cSBPsupine 122.1±13.9 mm Hg vs cSBPseated 120.7±15.7 mmHg; cSBPnon-experienced 120.6±20.5 mm Hg and cSBPexperienced 119.2±19.9 mm Hg). The mean difference of cSBP between supine and seated positions was 1.5±6.8 and -1.4±5.0 mm Hg between experienced and non-experienced users. This study showed good accuracy in assessing cSBP with an oscillometric BP measurement device Tel-O-GRAPH compared with a Sphygmocor. Furthermore, the calculation of cSBP by Tel-O-GRAPH appears to be easy and can be done during the routine brachial BP measurement. Computed cSBP values seem to remain reliable independently of the patient body position and experience of the operator. Consequently, the easiness of utilization and reliability of the device may open the opportunity for its extended use in everyday clinical practice, as well as reliable alternative for clinical studies, making complex applanation tonometry dispensable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27121445     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2016.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  25 in total

1.  Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity.

Authors:  Iván G Horváth; Adám Németh; Zsófia Lenkey; Nicola Alessandri; Fabrizio Tufano; Pál Kis; Balázs Gaszner; Attila Cziráki
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.

Authors:  Wolfgang Weiss; Christopher Gohlisch; Christl Harsch-Gladisch; Markus Tölle; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Evaluation of the Vicorder, a novel cuff-based device for the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure.

Authors:  Giacomo Pucci; Joseph Cheriyan; Annette Hubsch; Stacey S Hickson; Parag R Gajendragadkar; Timothy Watson; Michael O'Sullivan; Jean Woodcock-Smith; Giuseppe Schillaci; Ian B Wilkinson; Carmel M McEniery
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Moving on--on average in the right direction?: noninvasive methods to estimate central blood pressure.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  W B White; A S Berson; C Robbins; M J Jamieson; L M Prisant; E Roccella; S G Sheps
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  An outline of the revised British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices.

Authors:  E O'Brien; J Petrie; W Littler; M de Swiet; P L Padfield; D G Altman; M Bland; A Coats; N Atkins
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.

Authors:  Rachel E D Climie; Martin G Schultz; Sonja B Nikolic; Kiran D K Ahuja; James W Fell; James E Sharman
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Michel E Safar; Jacques Blacher; Bruno Pannier; Alain P Guerin; Sylvain J Marchais; Pierre-Marie Guyonvarc'h; Gérard M London
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man.

Authors:  M Karamanoglu; M F O'Rourke; A P Avolio; R P Kelly
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Invasive validation of arteriograph estimates of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Niklas Blach Rossen; Esben Laugesen; Christian Daugaard Peters; Eva Ebbehøj; Søren Tang Knudsen; Per Løgstrup Poulsen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Klavs Würgler Hansen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.689

View more
  1 in total

1.  Noninvasive oscillometric cardiac output determination in the intensive care unit - comparison with invasive transpulmonary thermodilution.

Authors:  Alexander Reshetnik; Friederike Compton; Anna Schölzel; Markus Tölle; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.