Literature DB >> 27114548

Origin and evolution of developmental enhancers in the mammalian neocortex.

Deena Emera1, Jun Yin1, Steven K Reilly1, Jake Gockley1, James P Noonan2.   

Abstract

Morphological innovations such as the mammalian neocortex may involve the evolution of novel regulatory sequences. However, de novo birth of regulatory elements active during morphogenesis has not been extensively studied in mammals. Here, we use H3K27ac-defined regulatory elements active during human and mouse corticogenesis to identify enhancers that were likely active in the ancient mammalian forebrain. We infer the phylogenetic origins of these enhancers and find that ∼20% arose in the mammalian stem lineage, coincident with the emergence of the neocortex. Implementing a permutation strategy that controls for the nonrandom variation in the ages of background genomic sequences, we find that mammal-specific enhancers are overrepresented near genes involved in cell migration, cell signaling, and axon guidance. Mammal-specific enhancers are also overrepresented in modules of coexpressed genes in the cortex that are associated with these pathways, notably ephrin and semaphorin signaling. Our results also provide insight into the mechanisms of regulatory innovation in mammals. We find that most neocortical enhancers did not originate by en bloc exaptation of transposons. Young neocortical enhancers exhibit smaller H3K27ac footprints and weaker evolutionary constraint in eutherian mammals than older neocortical enhancers. Based on these observations, we present a model of the enhancer life cycle in which neocortical enhancers initially emerge from genomic background as short, weakly constrained "proto-enhancers." Many proto-enhancers are likely lost, but some may serve as nucleation points for complex enhancers to evolve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain evolution; epigenetics; neocortical development; regulatory innovation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27114548      PMCID: PMC4868431          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1603718113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  53 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Bradley J Molyneaux; Paola Arlotta; Joao R L Menezes; Jeffrey D Macklis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks.

Authors:  Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Close sequence comparisons are sufficient to identify human cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Shyam Prabhakar; Francis Poulin; Malak Shoukry; Veena Afzal; Edward M Rubin; Olivier Couronne; Len A Pennacchio
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Morphological evolution through multiple cis-regulatory mutations at a single gene.

Authors:  Alistair P McGregor; Virginie Orgogozo; Isabelle Delon; Jennifer Zanet; Dayalan G Srinivasan; François Payre; David L Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The evolution of gene regulation underlies a morphological difference between two Drosophila sister species.

Authors:  Sangyun Jeong; Mark Rebeiz; Peter Andolfatto; Thomas Werner; John True; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Three periods of regulatory innovation during vertebrate evolution.

Authors:  Craig B Lowe; Manolis Kellis; Adam Siepel; Brian J Raney; Michele Clamp; Sofie R Salama; David M Kingsley; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; David Haussler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Comparative aspects of cortical neurogenesis in vertebrates.

Authors:  Amanda F P Cheung; Alexander A Pollen; Aniket Tavare; Jamin DeProto; Zoltán Molnár
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Morphological evolution caused by many subtle-effect substitutions in regulatory DNA.

Authors:  Nicolás Frankel; Deniz F Erezyilmaz; Alistair P McGregor; Shu Wang; François Payre; David L Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals vertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis.

Authors:  Naoki Irie; Shigeru Kuratani
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Eukaryotic genome size databases.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory; James A Nicol; Heidi Tamm; Bellis Kullman; Kaur Kullman; Ilia J Leitch; Brian G Murray; Donald F Kapraun; Johann Greilhuber; Michael D Bennett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  34 in total

1.  Expression of endogenous retroviruses reflects increased usage of atypical enhancers in T cells.

Authors:  Saliha Azébi; Eric Batsché; Frédérique Michel; Etienne Kornobis; Christian Muchardt
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  ChIP-ping the branches of the tree: functional genomics and the evolution of eukaryotic gene regulation.

Authors:  Georgi K Marinov; Anshul Kundaje
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Living Organisms Author Their Read-Write Genomes in Evolution.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-06

4.  Redundant and Cryptic Enhancer Activities of the Drosophila yellow Gene.

Authors:  Gizem Kalay; Jennifer Lachowiec; Ulises Rosas; Mackenzie R Dome; Patricia Wittkopp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Enhancer evolution and the origins of morphological novelty.

Authors:  Mark Rebeiz; Miltos Tsiantis
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Evolutionary Rewiring of Human Regulatory Networks by Waves of Genome Expansion.

Authors:  Davide Marnetto; Federica Mantica; Ivan Molineris; Elena Grassi; Igor Pesando; Paolo Provero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Striatal H3K27 Acetylation Linked to Glutamatergic Gene Dysregulation in Human Heroin Abusers Holds Promise as Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Gabor Egervari; Joseph Landry; James Callens; John F Fullard; Panos Roussos; Eva Keller; Yasmin L Hurd
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits.

Authors:  Edward B Chuong; Nels C Elde; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Trans-ancestral dissection of urate- and gout-associated major loci SLC2A9 and ABCG2 reveals primate-specific regulatory effects.

Authors:  Riku Takei; Murray Cadzow; David Markie; Matt Bixley; Amanda Phipps-Green; Tanya J Major; Changgui Li; Hyon K Choi; Zhiqiang Li; Hua Hu; Hui Guo; Meian He; Yongyong Shi; Lisa K Stamp; Nicola Dalbeth; Tony R Merriman; Wen-Hua Wei
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Transposable Element Exaptation into Regulatory Regions Is Rare, Influenced by Evolutionary Age, and Subject to Pleiotropic Constraints.

Authors:  Corinne N Simonti; Mihaela Pavlicev; John A Capra
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.