Diogo Goulart Corrêa1,2, Nicolle Zimmermann3,4, Denis Batista Pereira3, Thomas M Doring5, Tania Maria Netto3, Nina Ventura3,5, Rochele Paz Fonseca3,4, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto3,5. 1. Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 255, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-913, Brazil. diogogoulartcorrea@yahoo.com.br. 2. Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. diogogoulartcorrea@yahoo.com.br. 3. Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 255, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-913, Brazil. 4. Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 5. Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the white matter integrity in brains of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a voxel-based analyses of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with SLE were compared to 36 control patients who were matched by gender, age, education, and Mini Mental State Examination score. DTI was performed along 30 noncollinear directions in a 1.5 Tesla scanner. For tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), a white matter skeleton was created, and a permutation-based inference with 5000 permutations and a threshold of p < 0.05 was used to identify abnormalities in fractional anisotropy (FA). The mean (MD), radial (RD), and axial diffusivities (AD) were also projected onto the mean FA skeleton. RESULTS: We found a significant decrease of global FA in SLE patients compared to controls. The areas of reduced FA included the right superior corona radiata, the right superior longitudinal fasciculus, the body of the corpus callosum, the right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, the right thalamic radiation, and the right uncinate fasciculus. Patients with SLE also had increased AD and RD in several areas. Substantial overlap of areas with increased AD and RD occurred and were spatially much more extensive than the areas of reduced FA. CONCLUSION: Significant increases of AD values were concordant to those of RD and MD and more extensive than FA changes. Analyzing all diffusivity parameters, using TBSS, can detect more white matter microstructural changes in patients with SLE than analyzing FA alone.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the white matter integrity in brains of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a voxel-based analyses of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with SLE were compared to 36 control patients who were matched by gender, age, education, and Mini Mental State Examination score. DTI was performed along 30 noncollinear directions in a 1.5 Tesla scanner. For tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), a white matter skeleton was created, and a permutation-based inference with 5000 permutations and a threshold of p < 0.05 was used to identify abnormalities in fractional anisotropy (FA). The mean (MD), radial (RD), and axial diffusivities (AD) were also projected onto the mean FA skeleton. RESULTS: We found a significant decrease of global FA in SLEpatients compared to controls. The areas of reduced FA included the right superior corona radiata, the right superior longitudinal fasciculus, the body of the corpus callosum, the right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, the right thalamic radiation, and the right uncinate fasciculus. Patients with SLE also had increased AD and RD in several areas. Substantial overlap of areas with increased AD and RD occurred and were spatially much more extensive than the areas of reduced FA. CONCLUSION: Significant increases of AD values were concordant to those of RD and MD and more extensive than FA changes. Analyzing all diffusivity parameters, using TBSS, can detect more white matter microstructural changes in patients with SLE than analyzing FA alone.
Authors: Bart J Emmer; Ilya M Veer; Gerda M Steup-Beekman; Tom W J Huizinga; Jeroen van der Grond; Mark A van Buchem Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-12
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Elizabeth Kozora; David B Arciniegas; Christopher M Filley; Misoo C Ellison; Sterling G West; Mark S Brown; Jack H Simon Journal: Cogn Behav Neurol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: B Cesar; M G Dwyer; J L Shucard; P Polak; N Bergsland; R H B Benedict; B Weinstock-Guttman; D W Shucard; R Zivadinov Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Rex E Jung; Arvind Caprihan; Robert S Chavez; Ranee A Flores; Janeen Sharrar; Clifford R Qualls; Wilmer Sibbitt; Carlos A Roldan Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Wilmer L Sibbitt; William M Brooks; Mario Kornfeld; Blaine L Hart; Arthur D Bankhurst; Carlos A Roldan Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2009-10-31 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: R Zivadinov; J L Shucard; S Hussein; J Durfee; J L Cox; N Bergsland; M G Dwyer; R H B Benedict; J Ambrus; D W Shucard Journal: Lupus Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Diogo G Corrêa; Nicolle Zimmermann; Rafael S Borges; Denis B Pereira; Thomas M Doring; Gustavo Tukamoto; Rochele P Fonseca; Emerson L Gasparetto Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2018-08-09