Literature DB >> 27113032

Understanding the Use of Prostate Biopsy Among Men with Limited Life Expectancy in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Firas Abdollah1, Zaojun Ye2, David C Miller2, Susan M Linsell2, James E Montie2, James O Peabody1, Khurshid R Ghani3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential harms of a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis may outweigh its benefits in elderly men.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of prostate biopsy in men with limited life expectancy (LE) within the practices comprising the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: MUSIC is a consortium of 42 practices and nearly 85% of the urologists in Michigan. From July 2013 to October 2014, clinical data were collected prospectively for all men undergoing prostate biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We calculated comorbidity-adjusted LE in men aged ≥66 yr and identified men with <10 yr LE (limited LE) undergoing a first biopsy. Our LE calculator was not designed for men aged <66 yr; thus these men were excluded. Multivariable models estimated the proportion of all biopsies performed for men with limited LE in each MUSIC practice, adjusting for differences in patient characteristics. We also evaluated what treatments, if any, these patients received. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 3035 men aged ≥66 yr undergoing initial prostate biopsy, 60% had none of the measured comorbidities. Overall, 547 men (18%) had limited LE. Compared with men with a longer LE, these men had significantly higher prostate-specific antigen levels and abnormal digital rectal examination findings. The adjusted proportion of biopsies performed for men with limited LE ranged from 3.8% to 39% across MUSIC practices (p < 0.001). PCa was diagnosed in 69% of men with limited LE; among this group, 74% received any active treatment. Of these men, 46% had high-grade cancer (Gleason score 8-10).
CONCLUSIONS: Among a large and diverse group of urology practices, nearly 20% of prostate biopsies are performed in men with limited LE. These data provide useful context for quality improvement efforts aimed at optimizing patient selection for prostate biopsy. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In this report, nearly 2 of every 10 men undergoing prostate biopsy had a life expectancy (LE) <10 yr. Implementing LE calculators in clinical practice may help refine patient selection for prostate biopsy. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Life expectancy; Prostate biopsy; Variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27113032     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  4 in total

Review 1.  Improving quality through clinical registries in urology.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; Lauren P Wallner; Ted A Skolarus; Arvin K George; Bradley H Rosenberg; Paul Abrahamse; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 7.600

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae Joon Park; Do Kyung Kim; Soomin Lee; Yoonseo Choi; Yon Hee Kim; Joon-Ho Lee; Ki Hyun Kim; Jae Heon Kim
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-02

4.  Using an Automated Electronic Health Record Score To Estimate Life Expectancy In Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer In The Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Simon John Christoph Soerensen; I-Chun Thomas; Bogdana Schmidt; Timothy J Daskivich; Ted A Skolarus; Christian Jackson; Thomas F Osborne; Glenn M Chertow; James D Brooks; David H Rehkopf; John T Leppert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.633

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.