| Literature DB >> 27110442 |
Florian Lammers1, Arian Mobascher2, Francesco Musso3, Nadim Jon Shah4, Tracy Warbrick5, Laszlo Zaborszky6, Georg Winterer7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cortical acetylcholine released from cells in the basal forebrain facilitates cue detection and improves attentional performance. Cholinergic fibres to the cortex originate from the CH4 cell group, sometimes referred to as the Nucleus basalis of Meynert and the Nucleus subputaminalis of Ayala. The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of volumes of cholinergic nuclei on attention and executive function.Entities:
Keywords: Acetylcholine; attention; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); neuroimaging
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 27110442 PMCID: PMC4834944 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Behav Impact factor: 2.708
Figure 1Segmentation example for one brain. The blue ROI refers to CH4, CH4p is shown in yellow. Slices were chosen with the intention to show that CH4p covers a cell cluster often referred to as the Nucleus subputaminalis of Ayala which is rostrolateral extension of the NBM (at 12, 14 and 15 mm). Slice positions are indicated with reference to the most anterior slice on the top left.
Linear effects of normalized cholinergic subregion volumes on task performance
| Independent variable | TMT Part A B ± SE ( | TMT Part B B ± SE ( | Stroop‐effect B ± SE ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Left CH4 | 0.026 ± 0.027 (0.343) | 0.075 ± 0.064 (0.251) | 0.034 ± 0.047 (0.484) |
| Left CH4 × Sex | 0.162 ± 0.056 (0.007 | 0.380 ± 0.127 (0.005 | 0.195 ± 0.090 (0.038 |
| Left CH4 × Age | −0.003 ± 0.002 (0.077) | – (n.s.) | – (n.s.) |
| Right CH4 | 0.025 ± 0.029 (0.399) | 0.117 ± 0.079 (0.149) | 0.015 ± 0.052 (0.782) |
| Right CH4 × Sex | 0.161 ± 0.054 (0.006 | – (n.s.) | – (n.s.) |
| Left CH4p | −0.037 ± 0.089 (0.683) | −0.184 ± 0.235 (0.439) | −0.023 ± 0.141 (0.874) |
| Right CH4p | −0.003 ± 0.057 (0.958) | 0.048 ± 0.147 (0.744) | −0.036 ± 0.089 (0.691) |
TMT, Trail‐Making Test.
Indicates any effect significant at P < 0.05 without Bonferroni correction, (n.s.) indicates an insignificant term which was rejected from the model. Unstandardized B‐coefficients with standard errors (SE) as well as the respective P‐values are also shown.
Figure 2Effects of the left CH4 volume on Trail‐Making Test (TMT) performance analysed in a linear (left) and quadratic (right) regression. The proportion of variance in TMT performance explained exclusively by the left CH4 volume is shown on the bottom left of each plot (R2). ** indicates a significant corrected P‐value for the quadratic term. The adjusted R2 for each test was larger for the quadratic (adj. R2 TMT‐A = 0.361, adj. R2 TMT‐B = 0.571) than the linear model (adj. R2 TMT‐A = 0.332, adj. R2 TMT‐B = 0.423), indicating an improvement of the model by using quadratic regression.
Effects of normalized left CH4 volume and covariates on TMT Part A in the quadratic regression analysis
| Independent variable | B‐coefficient ± SE | Standardized |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Squared volume | 0.001 ± 0.000 | 0.534 | 0.012 |
| Volume | 0.062 ± 0.023 | 0.418 | 0.040 |
| Volume × Age | −0.005 ± 0.002 | −0.377 | 0.022 |
| Sex | −4.058 ± 2.130 | −0.300 | 0.066 |
| Age | 0.076 ± 0.093 | 0.121 | 0.421 |
| Education | −0.813 ± 0.360 | −0.312 | 0.031 |
| Intercept | 23.153 ± 1.214 | <0.001 |
TMT, Trail‐Making Test; SE, standard error.
*Indicates any effect significant at P < 0.05 without correction, whereas **indicates a significant effect of core volume on test performance after Bonferroni correction.
Effects of normalized left CH4 volume and covariates on TMT Part B in the quadratic regression analysis
| Independent variable | B‐coefficient ± SE | Standardized |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Squared volume | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0.507 | 0.020 |
| Volume | 0.116 ± 0.058 | 0.302 | 0.216 |
| Volume × Age | −0.012 ± 0.004 | −0.389 | 0.006 |
| Volume × Sex | 0.249 ± 0.135 | 0.301 | 0.076 |
| Sex | 0.115 ± 5.213 | 0.003 | 0.983 |
| Age | 0.057 ± 0.203 | 0.035 | 0.773 |
| Education | −1.099 ± 0.853 | −0.161 | 0.761 |
| Intercept | 51.050 ± 2.704 | <0.001 |
TMT, Trail‐Making Test; SE, standard error.
*Indicates any effect significant at P < 0.05 without correction, whereas **indicates a significant effect of core volume on test performance after Bonferroni correction.