Literature DB >> 30137295

Functional Subdivisions of Magnocellular Cell Groups in Human Basal Forebrain: Test-Retest Resting-State Study at Ultra-high Field, and Meta-analysis.

Rui Yuan1, Bharat B Biswal1,2, Laszlo Zaborszky3.   

Abstract

The heterogeneous neuronal subgroups of the basal forebrain corticopetal system (BFcs) have been shown to modulate cortical functions through their cholinergic, gamma-aminobutyric acid-ergic, and glutamatergic projections to the entire cortex. Although previous studies suggested that the basalo-cortical projection system influences various cognitive functions, particularly via its cholinergic component, these studies only focused on certain parts of the BFcs or nearby structures, leaving aside a more systematic picture of the functional connectivity of BFcs subcompartments. Moreover, these studies lacked the high-spatial resolution and the probability maps needed to identify specific subcompartments. Recent advances in the ultra-high field 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provided potentially unprecedented spatial resolution of functional MRI images to study the subdivision of the BFcs. In this study, the BF space containing corticopetal cells was divided into 3 functionally distinct subdivisions based on functional connection to cortical regions derived from fMRI. The overall functional connection of each BFcs subdivision was examined with a test-retest study. Finally, a meta-analysis was used to study the related functional topics of each BF subdivision. Our results demonstrate distinct functional connectivity patterns of these subdivisions along the rostrocaudal axis of the BF. All three compartments have shown consistent segregation and overlap at specific target regions including the hippocampus, insula, thalamus, and the cingulate gyrus, suggesting functional integration and separation in BFcs.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7-Tesla; BOLD; basal forebrain; fMRI; resting-state

Year:  2019        PMID: 30137295      PMCID: PMC6611453          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  121 in total

1.  Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function.

Authors:  D A Gusnard; E Akbudak; G L Shulman; M E Raichle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Basal forebrain in the context of schizophrenia.

Authors:  L Heimer
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2000-03

3.  Loss of cholinergic phenotype in basal forebrain coincides with cognitive decline in a mouse model of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  A C Granholm; L A Sanders; L S Crnic
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  A default mode of brain function.

Authors:  M E Raichle; A M MacLeod; A Z Snyder; W J Powers; D A Gusnard; G L Shulman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Tonic and phasic influence of basal forebrain unit activity on the cortical EEG.

Authors:  L Détári
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Cognitive functions of the basal forebrain.

Authors:  M G Baxter; A A Chiba
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Neural interaction between the basal forebrain and functionally distinct prefrontal cortices in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  H T Ghashghaei; H Barbas
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Pallidal and cerebellar afferents to pre-supplementary motor area thalamocortical neurons in the owl monkey: a multiple labeling study.

Authors:  S T Sakai; I Stepniewska; H X Qi; J H Kaas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Monoaminergic-cholinergic interactions in the primate basal forebrain.

Authors:  J F Smiley; M Subramanian; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 10.  Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000).

Authors:  R Peyron; B Laurent; L García-Larrea
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.734

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Specific Basal Forebrain-Cortical Cholinergic Circuits Coordinate Cognitive Operations.

Authors:  Laszlo Záborszky; Peter Gombkoto; Peter Varsanyi; Matthew R Gielow; Gina Poe; Lorna W Role; Mala Ananth; Prithviraj Rajebhosale; David A Talmage; Michael E Hasselmo; Holger Dannenberg; Victor H Minces; Andrea A Chiba
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Nuclei and Their Relevance to Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders.

Authors:  Sofia Eickhoff; Leon Franzen; Alexandra Korda; Helena Rogg; Valerie-Noelle Trulley; Stefan Borgwardt; Mihai Avram
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  Dynamic subcortical modulators of human default mode network function.

Authors:  Ben J Harrison; Christopher G Davey; Hannah S Savage; Alec J Jamieson; Christine A Leonards; Bradford A Moffat; Rebecca K Glarin; Trevor Steward
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.861

4.  Rescuing the attentional performance of rats with cholinergic losses by the M1 positive allosteric modulator TAK-071.

Authors:  Aaron Kucinski; Kyra B Phillips; Ajeesh Koshy Cherian; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Phasic cholinergic signaling promotes emergence of local gamma rhythms in excitatory-inhibitory networks.

Authors:  Yiqing Lu; Martin Sarter; Michal Zochowski; Victoria Booth
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Theta-gamma coupling emerges from spatially heterogeneous cholinergic neuromodulation.

Authors:  Yihao Yang; Howard Gritton; Martin Sarter; Sara J Aton; Victoria Booth; Michal Zochowski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Nucleus basalis stimulation enhances working memory by stabilizing stimulus representations in primate prefrontal cortical activity.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Qi; Ruifeng Liu; Balbir Singh; David Bestue; Albert Compte; Almira I Vazdarjanova; David T Blake; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 9.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.